:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從人格權歸屬論子女稱姓選擇權
書刊名:世新法學
作者:林燕華
作者(外文):Lin, Yen-hua
出版日期:2009
卷期:3:1
頁次:頁164-196
主題關鍵詞:人格權基本權姓名權子女稱姓The personality rightsThe right of nameThe right of children's surname
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:10
人格權保障,為當代法律思潮之核心,而姓名權為人格權之一,均為我國憲法所保障。惟我國民法對姓名權雖早已明文保護,卻因傳統觀念之束縛,令子女姓氏權從被視為由父親獨占傳承之特權,繼之成為父母共享之選擇權,而由憲法保障予人格主體之基本權利當事人,卻不能有所主張。以現行民法對於子女改姓之限制,導致單親父母所攜子女之改姓問題困難重重,平添許多來自單親家庭之社會問題,本文爰擬從問題本質來檢視人格權之歸屬,期能對此項爭議不斷之癥結釐清,有所助益。
The protection of the personality rights is a core value in contemporary jurisprudence thinking. The right of name is one of the personality rights, the most fundamental rights that are protected by the Constitution in Taiwan. Men and women have equal rights in the society of Taiwan. And, correspondingly, the right of name has long been protected under existing law. However, it had been customary and deemed as fathers’ privilege that children born to married couples were given their father’s surname at birth. It gradually becomes the rights of both parents to choose between either of their surnames in recent years. Ironically, Parents promise to protect children but forget to accord them the basic human rights of the right of surname, which is constitutionally protected. According to article 18 of the civil law, anyone may file a motion with the court that seeks for protection when a violation of personality rights occurs to him. This clearly shows the wholeness, exclusiveness and inviolableness of the personality rights in protecting individual personality; and how civil law jurisdiction based on the constitution provides the substantial protection on personality rights such as the right to the inviolability and integrity. Due to severe legal constrains, requesting a change of surname is very difficult. It leads to a serious problem for single-parent families. This article is discussing the ownership of one’s personality rights. The surname of an individual should not be decided arbitrarily by either of his/her parents. The primary purpose of this article is to reinforce the idea that ‘anyone should have the right to choose his/her own surname between either of their parents’”. The article 1159 of the civil law should be amended as soon as possible in order to facilitate legal process of surname changing for those in need.
期刊論文
1.王澤鑑(20060900)。人格權保護的課題與展望(3)--人格權的具體化及保護範圍(2):姓名權。臺灣本土法學雜誌,86,41-55。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳祺昌(20060200)。漫談子女姓氏問題。公證法學,3,124-125。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡宏光(20011200)。現行民法親屬編上子女稱姓之商榷。華岡法粹,28,83-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.徐良維(20060600)。國家權力干預人民基本權之合法性與正當性。政策研究學報,6,267-303。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.李玲玲(20020100)。論婚生子女之稱姓。月旦法學,80,210-230。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.楊與齡(19910900)。姓氏立法問題經緯。法令月刊,42(9),7-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.簡良育(20081000)。民法親屬編修正後子女稱姓之探討。月旦法學,161,12-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳煜宗(20080200)。子女姓氏之法規範與家族秩序。全國律師,12(2),21-31。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.尤美女(2009)。子女爭奪戰--談子女監護權,http://www.honhai007.org/experc04.hcml, 2009/05/02。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱芳瑤(20081010)。未刪「不利之影響」何來鬆綁。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱芳瑤(20080921)。改從母姓離婚子女無「法」自主。  延伸查詢new window
4.李念祖(19990613)。民法債編--人格權。  延伸查詢new window
5.李靜芳(20071125)。從母姓較有利聲請變更從母姓雲地院判准3例。  延伸查詢new window
6.林英喆(20051116)。陳其南:姓氏血緣不必綁在一起。  延伸查詢new window
7.林恕暉(20080512)。子女從母姓62%準父母不願意。  延伸查詢new window
8.林燕華(200906)。民法第一千零五十九條及第一千零五十九條之--條文修正草案評估報告。  延伸查詢new window
9.張志偉(2009)。美國法上真正惡意原則之繼受--言論自由與人格權保障的利益權衡,http://www.ncpu.edu.tw/law/upload/webscvledefaulc/89651104~2.pdf, 。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳怡君(20080512)。司法阻礙單親孩子難改母姓。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳慧真(20070627)。法務部:民法子女姓氏修正是為落實兩性平權,http://nplnews.lv.gov.tw/index.isp, 2009/11/12。  延伸查詢new window
12.傅希堯(20081010)。子女姓氏變更較方便了。  延伸查詢new window
13.談章孝嚴先生從母姓,http://forum.frontier.ors.cw/women/viewcopic.phpPtopic-SSSl&forum=3&2, 2009/04/11。  new window
14.權利之概念與分類,http://www.moi.Kov.tw/cc.asp?xkem=28174&ccNode=7945, 2009/04/02。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top