:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:比與比值初始概念的教學初探
書刊名:新竹教育大學教育學報
作者:林碧珍(Lin, Pi-jen) 
出版日期:2010
卷期:27:1
頁次:頁127-159
主題關鍵詞:比值比感語意結構RateRatioSense of ratioSemantic structure
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:51
本研究目的是依據Lamon(1993)的比與比值語意結構的分類,提出比與比值初始概念引入的替代性教學設計及試驗性教學初探。採用文獻評析,提出影響學生學習比值的重要因素及分析教科書的架構;以內容分析法,分析現行六年級教科書在比與比值單元的題目情境類型。本文亦提出比與比值起始概念引入的關鍵概念:比的使用之適當性、比感的建立、及比值相對關係。兩數量在題目中需符合固定倍數關係、情境可類推性、對應關係意義化三種條件,使用比的符號,才具意義性。本研究的替代性教學設計包含教學目標及教學布題,可作為教科書編輯及教師教學設計的參考。
The study was indented to explore an alternative approach of teaching initial concept of rate and ratio by taking the view of the nature of mathematics in which is based on Lamon's four semantic structures of proportion problems. Main factors of influencing students' solving proportion problems and the framework of analyzing current textbooks were addressed by literature reviewing. The semantic structures of the proportion problems were compared and contrast among three textbooks. The key initial concepts of ratio includes: the use of ratio, the sense of ratio, and the meaning of the relationship between two numbers. Particularly, the study claims that students learned the sense of ration by emphasizing the use of ratio in which ratio can only be used when the contexts of problem is inferred and the numbers are patterns. The inference of contexts being embedded into the problems are two essential elements of developing sense of ratio. The alternative instructional design can be as a reference for curriculum writing committees.
期刊論文
1.沈明勳、劉祥通(20020600)。分析學生解比例問題文獻--國小數學課程與教學的建議。科學教育研究與發展季刊,27,81-96。  延伸查詢new window
2.Jeong, Y., Levine, S. C.,、Huttenlocker, J.(2007)。The development of proportional reasoning: Effect of continuous versus discrete quantities。Journal of Cognition and Development,8(2),237-256。  new window
3.Lamon, S.(1993)。Ration and proportion: Connecting content and children'sthinking。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,24(1),41-61。  new window
4.Lo, J.,、Watanable, T.(1997)。Developing ratio and proportion schemes: A storyof fifth grader。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,28(2),216-236。  new window
5.Ruiz, E. F.,、Lupianez, J. L.(2009)。Detecting psychological obstacles to teaching and learning the topics of ratio and proportion in sixth grade primary pupils。Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology,17(7),397-424。  new window
6.Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E.,、Lasure, S.(1994)。Realistic considerations inmathematical modeling of school arithmetic word problem。Learning and Instruction,4,273-294。  new window
會議論文
1.Steinthorsdottir, B.(2006)。Proportional reasoningreasoning: Variable influencingthe problem difficulty level and one's use of problem solving strategies。Prague。169-179。  new window
2.Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Evers, M.,、Verschaffel, L.(2006)。Pupils' overuseof proportionality on missing vaule problems: How numbers may change solutions。Prague。305-312。  new window
學位論文
1.莊玉如(2005)。國小四年級學童比例問題解題表現之研究,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭佩儀(2007)。從比例問題的表面結構和深層結構探究國一學生的解題表現及解題策略情形,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(1973)。國民小學課程標準。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.南一書局編撰委員會(2009)。國民小學數學課本第十一冊。臺南市:南一。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳竹村、林淑君、陳俊瑜(2002)。國小數學教材分析--比(含線段圖)。臺北縣:國立教育研究院籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要--數學領域。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部國教司(1975)。國民小學課程標準。臺北:教育部:正中。  延伸查詢new window
6.國立編譯館(1982)。國民小學數學教學指引第十一冊。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.國立編譯館(2000)。國民小學數學教學指引第十冊。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.國立編譯館(2001)。國民小學數學教學指引第十二冊。臺北市:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
9.康軒編撰委員會(2009)。國民小學數學教學指引第十一冊。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
10.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程正式綱要-數學學習領域。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉祥通(2004)。分數與比例問題解題分析-從數學題問教學的觀點。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.Hart, K. M.(1981)。Fractions。Children understanding of mathematics。Oxford, London。  new window
13.Lamon, S.(1994)。Ration and proportion: Cognitive foundations in utilizing and norming。The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics。Albany, NY。  new window
14.Paige, D. D., Willcutt, R. E.,、Wagenblast, J. M.(1968)。Mathematics methods for junior high school teachers。Boston。  new window
其他
1.國民教育司(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域,台北:教育部。,http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php?login_type=1。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Karplus, R.、Pulos, S.、Stage, E. K.(1983)。Proportional reasoning of early adolescents。Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE