:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:著作權間接侵害責任之探討--2009年新展望
書刊名:東海大學法學研究
作者:曾勝珍 引用關係
作者(外文):Tseng, Sheng-chen
出版日期:2009
卷期:31
頁次:頁189-240
主題關鍵詞:著作權間接侵害責任網際網路輔助侵害責任替代侵害責任引誘侵害責任點對點傳輸智慧財產權電子千禧著作權法CopyrightSecondary liabilityInternetContributory liabilityVicarious liabilityInducement liabilityP2pIntellectual property the digital millennium copyright act
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
國際唱片交流基金會(IFPI)公布的音樂市場報告指出,2008年違法下載的音樂檔案約有400億個,盜版率高達95%,先前我國在ezPeer及Kuro兩案後,對網路業者展開法律追訴行動,因應近年來美國聯邦最高法院,於美國唱片工業協會(RIAA)與Grokster案中所做的判決結果,在在顯示各國規範著作權侵害及間接侵害責任立法的必要性。我國甫於2009年4月21日立法院三讀通過修正「著作權法」,主要針對網路服務提供者,因使用者利用其所提供之服務侵害他人著作權或製版權,得主張不負責任之範圍及要件,亦研究美國對網路終端使用者規範的權利、義務及責任,探討終端使用者使用網路分享資訊須承擔之法律責任,再佐以實務案例對第二順位侵權責任的實務見解與理論依據,統整目前美國著作權侵害責任之分類與歷史過程,並悉論目前適用及運用情形。包括參考美國著作權法實務,如替代侵害責任、輔助侵害責任與引誘侵害責任,並輔以說明我國現況,最後檢視我國著作權法相關規定,統整後提出建議暨結論。希冀本文對網路著作權侵害責任之分析,能為我國在相關案件之處理,提供適用法律之依據,以供參考。
Digital Music Report 2009 from the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) shows, in 2008, the digital music business internationally grew by an estimated 25 per cent to US$3.7 billion in trade value. In 2005, the ezPeer and Kuro cases of internet copyright infringement of MP3 downloading in the ROC. District Courts got the different results. The United States Supreme Court also issued its decision in case of the Recording Industry Association of America with Grokster. All the facts attempted to answer that question and to settle the doctrinal confusion of contributory copyright liability.ROC improves its IPR regime by amended the Copyright Law by the Legislative Yuan in April 21, 2009, trying to solve the problems of ending illegal file-sharing over peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms, to discuss the issues of copyright secondary liability and digital technology appearing to pose a threat to copyright holders. Learning the experiences and history from the States, including the duty and responsibility of end users, because digital technology eases the reproduction of copyright and facilitates the global distribution of infringing products.This article will discuss the theories of secondary liability, it examines the current law of vicarious, contributory, inducement liability. Secondly, this article is going to introduce the U.S. cases and judicial decisions. Thirdly, it tries to reveal ROC Copyright Law in related to copyright secondary liability. Finally, the analysis is assessing how the law of secondary liability fails to lay a reasonable template for resolving complex issues of technological change.
期刊論文
1.Lichtman, Douglas、Landes, William(2003)。Indirect liability for copyright infringement: An economic perspective。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology,16(2),395-410。  new window
2.Knopf, Howard P.(2008)。Canadian Copyright Collectives and the Copyright Board: A Snapshot in 2008。Intellectual property journal,21(2),117-158。  new window
3.(2006)。21st Century Copyright Law in the Digital Domain Symposium Transcript。Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review,13,247/ 257-259/ 267。  new window
4.Feder, Jesse M.(2003)。Is Betamax Obsolete? Sony Corp. of Am. v. Universal City Studios, Inc. in the Age of Napster。Creighton Law Review,37,859-868。  new window
5.Giblin, Rebecca(2008)。A Bit Liable? A Guide to Navigating the U.S. Secondary Liability Patchwork。Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal,25,10-10。  new window
6.Ginsburg, Jane C.、Ricketson, Sam(2006)。Inducers and Authorisers: A Comparison of the US Supreme Court's Grokster Decision and the Australian Federal Court's KaZaa Ruling。Media & Arts Law Review,11,1-25。  new window
7.Katz, Peter(2004)。Copyright Infringement: The Perils of Indirect Liability。The Journal of Proprietary Rights,16,1-1。  new window
8.Wu, Tim(2006)。The Copyright Paradox, 2005。Supreme Court Review,229-246。  new window
圖書
1.曾勝珍(2008)。論網路著作權之侵害。元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE