:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智慧財產權之實行--亞洲公司於美國面臨之訴訟問題
書刊名:智慧財產評論
作者:鍾泳熾江易儒
作者(外文):Chung, Jack W.Chiang, I-ju
出版日期:2010
卷期:8:1
頁次:頁87-116
主題關鍵詞:訴訟專利侵權授權合約確認之訴管轄權對人司法管轄權電子蒐證LitigationPatent infringementLicensing agreementDeclaratory judgmentJurisdictionPersonal jurisdictionE-discovery
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:27
隨著國際化風潮日盛,許多公司紛紛成立跨國企業或進行跨國合作,然而當亞洲公司進入美國市場時,不僅商業策略、公司資源、財務狀況等因素會影響其於美國市場之發展,接踵而至的訴訟爭端也可能是影響其能否繼續立足商場的關鍵。一般而言,影響商業佈局的常見法律手段包括提起專利侵權訴訟,或控告合作對象違約、抑或彼此間存在糾紛,例如合約訂立之權限劃分模糊、或對權利金之爭執等。面對美國商業訴訟之亞洲公司往往因經驗不足、對美國司法環境不熟悉、訴訟程序或是文化語言差異等種種因素而處於不利地位。因此不論增加自身實戰經驗或廣納他人經驗,皆可創造對公司有利的經營策略,從而評估其風險與報酬之平衡,以穩固在美國市場之地位。
Many companies have become more multinational or seek for cross-border collaborations because of globalization.Asian companies attempting to enter the U.S. market must be aware that several factors, including business strategy, company resources, or financial status will influence the evelopment and success of the company. One of the most critical factors is the prevention and handling of litigation issues. Some common litigating methods include accusation of patent infringement, breach of contract, or a contract dispute. For example, when the scopes of rights in the contract are too vague or when both parties argue about royalties, these circumstances will most likely cause litigation. Asian companies who face business itigation in the U.S. are at a disadvantage because of the lack of experience and unfamiliarity with the U.S. judicial system, various litigation procedures, and cultural or language differences. However, if the companies learn what the litigation dangers are and the preventive steps to take to avoid them and implement useful strategies in the beginning, a successful business venture can be ensured.
其他
1.文家春,喬永忠,朱雪忠(200807)。專利侵權訴訟攻防策略研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.李榮德(200412)。應對涉外專利侵權訴訟的和解策略。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊生平(200803)。我國企業在美國應對專利糾紛的策略。  延伸查詢new window
4.王承守(2005)。專利授權契約之相關法律問題及其策略運用。  延伸查詢new window
5.台一國際專利法律事務所(200405)。契約之誤解與釋疑。  延伸查詢new window
6.李育菁,陳原逢,孫士欽,黃彩錦,黃萬見(200706)。台灣企業對美國專利訴訟之e-Discovery程序的因應。  延伸查詢new window
7.聖島國際智慧財產權新聞(200802)。美國專利訴訟中對人管轄權。  延伸查詢new window
8.IPO專利商品化網站(200510)。何謂授權。  延伸查詢new window
9.Shartzer, Adam(2009)。Patent Litigation 101: Empirical Support for the Patent Pilot Program’s Solution to Increase Judicial Experience in Patent Law。  new window
10.Chien, Colleen V.(2008)。Patently Protectionist? An Empirical Analysis of Patent Cases at the International Trade Commission。  new window
11.Levine, Jeffery F.(2007)。Levine, Note, Meeting the Challenges of International Brand Expansion in Professional Sport: Intellectual Property Right Enforcement in China though Treaties, Chinese Law and Cultural Mechanisms。  new window
12.Bhattacharya, Utpal ; Galpin, Neal ; Haslem, Bruce(2007)。The Home Court Advantage in International Corporate Litigation。  new window
13.Lynn III, Ceci A.(200707)。Litigation Preparedness: A Checklist for Corporate Counsel。  new window
14.Harlan, Eric R.(2007)。The Litigator’s Guide to Metadata。  new window
15.Guerrera, Francesco ; Masters, Brooke(20061213)。Foreign Companies Faring More Worse in US Law Courts。  new window
16.Baughman, Steve J. ; Hagiwara, Hiro ; Toh, Kaede(2008)。Asian Clients Need a Helping Hand in E-discovery。  new window
17.(20090831)。U.S. District Court Western District of Tennessee Official Court Electronic Document Filing System。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top