Following Ruth Macklin, Steven Pinker fiercely criticized the concept of dignity in his provocative article entitled "The Stupidity of Dignity." He contended that dignity is the most dangerous ploy conservative thinkers could take to oppress the progress of biomedical research. Divided into five parts, this article argues against Pinker's ideas. Firstly, the main reasons why Pinker objected to dignity are impartially presented and then, in the second part, two initial responses are given. One is concerned with the term "conservative" he regularly used. I believe that it is better for the participants of ethical forum to avoid its application because this term tends to blur, not to sharpen the right focus of ethical discussions on the rightness and wrongfulness of controversial issues at stake and the legitimacy of underlying arguments. Furthermore, I also believe that he battled in the wrong field by not questioning the personhood of human embryos but criticizing the concept of dignity as a foundation of ethical discussion. In the third and fourth parts the interpretations of the concept "dignity" by Pinker and by the so-called conservatives are separately introduced and critically reviewed. My thesis against Pinker is then systematically expounded in the fifth and last parts.