資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.117.86.224)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
如何量測產品的矛盾語意
書刊名:
設計學報
作者:
洪偉肯
/
陳玲鈴
作者(外文):
Hung, Wei-ken
/
Chen, Lin-lin
出版日期:
2010
卷期:
15:4
頁次:
頁41-58
主題關鍵詞:
矛盾
;
曖昧感覺
;
產品語意
;
語意差異法
;
多面向共存思考
;
Contradiction
;
Ambivalence
;
Product semantics
;
Semantic differential
;
Janusian thinking
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
4
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
4
共同引用:0
點閱:45
當調查產品造形語意時,研究者通常會使用雙極形容詞的語意差異法,如「現代-傳統」、「簡單複雜」等進行量測,並以平均數代表產品造形所傳遞的感覺。然而,許多實務案例明顯傳達了矛盾的語意;如復古車同時傳遞了傳統與現代;或如部分研究認為「既典型又新奇」、「夠先進但可接受」的設計可獲得高度的美感愉悅性,這些原則亦隱含矛盾語意。由於目前對於如何量測產品矛盾語意的研究仍相當欠缺,因此在本研究中,我們嘗試運用語意差異法的「標準差」來篩選具有矛盾語意的產品圖片,並參考矛盾態度量測方式另發展出「直接矛盾量測法」以進行確認。本研究結果顯示,帶有矛盾語意的設計皆具有相當大的標準差,且其峰度為負值。而「既典型又獨特」的矛盾設計,經常是以典型為基礎,再加入其它的功能或故事使其獨特;「既簡單又複雜」的設計,則是以簡單的產品架構為基礎,運用較複雜的材質、圖案或造形工藝技術使其複雜。整體而言,矛盾語意的操作方式,係以典型、簡單、理性為基礎,並加入其它元素,使其同時能夠呈現獨特、複雜、感性。前述結果的意義在於,當產品本身具有強烈的矛盾語意時,語意差異法所量測到的平均數,並不能真正代表該產品的感覺,但卻可運用標準差,初步篩選出可能帶有矛盾語意的產品。而本研究亦發現,標準差極大的原因,除了「矛盾語意」外,還包括「受測者群組間認知相反」、「沒有感覺」等,當發生這樣的情況時,應進一步觀察其次數分配圖,或另以直接矛盾量測法進行確認以避免誤判。
以文找文
When investigating the semantics projected by product forms, researchers often use the semantic differential method with bipolar adjectives, such as “modern-classical” or “simple-complex”. The image projected by a product is assumed to center somewhere in the continuum between the two opposite adjectives. However, in design practice, some design examples clearly exhibit the simultaneous use of contradictory meanings in product semantics. For example, retro cars evoke nostalgia by borrowing characteristics from classical cars, but at the same time exhibit modernness. In this research, we examined the results of applying the semantic differential method to measure contradiction in product semantics. Then, the results were verified by direct measurement method, which is developed from attitudinal ambivalence research. Our results showed that the distributions of semantic differential ratings for the stimuli with contradictory meanings have higher standard deviations. Further analysis indicated that these distributions deviate from the (symmetric) normal distribution with negative kurtosis value. In addition, we found that the “novelty-in-typicality” chairs are likely to have prototypical shapes with additional functions or embedded stories, and that the “simple yet complex” chairs are achieved through the use of material, texture, and complicated product forms. In general, successful embedding of contradictory meanings into product forms are based on simple, typical, and rational forms that are made to simultaneously exhibit complex, novel, and emotional images by introducing additional elements. This means that, for stimuli with contradictory meanings in product semantics, the usual implicit assumption that the image projected by a product form is centered somewhere between a pair of opposite adjectives, and that the ratings follow the normal distribution, does not hold. Large standard deviations in semantic differential ratings can be used to roughly filter out products with possible contradictory meanings. The reasons for relatively large standard deviation can result from three possible reasons, including contradiction, insensitivity, and differences between groups. Thus, a further analysis of distribution or a direct measurement method is needed to better measure the potential contradictory responses towards products.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
蕭坤安、Chen, Lin Lin(2006)。Fundamental dimensions of affective responses to product shapes。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,36(6),553-564。
2.
Bloch, Peter H.(1995)。Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response。Journal of Marketing,59(3),16-29。
3.
Armitage, C. J.、Conner, M.(2000)。Attitudinal Ambivalence: A Test of Three Key Hypotheses。Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,26(11),1421-1432。
4.
Jonas, K.、Broemer, P.、Diehl, M.(2000)。Attitudinal ambivalence。European Review of Social Psychology,11(1),35-74。
5.
Hekkert, P.、Snelders, D.、van Wieringen, P. C. W.(2003)。'Most advanced, yet acceptable': Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design。British Journal of Psychology,94(1),111-124。
6.
Crilly, Nathan、Moultrie, James、Clarkson, P. John(2004)。Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design。Design Studies,25(6),547-577。
7.
Russell, James A.(1980)。A circumplex model of affect。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39(6),1161-1178。
8.
Russell, J. A.、Carroll, J. M.(1999)。On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect。Psychological Bulletin,125(1),3-30。
9.
Smith, Craig A.、Ellsworth, Phoebe C.(1985)。Patterns of Cognitive Appraisal in Emotion。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,48(4),813-838。
10.
Hekkert, Paul、van Wieringen, Piet C. W.(1996)。The impact of level of expertise on the evaluation of original and altered versions of post-impressionistic paintings。Acta Psychologica,94(2),117-131。
11.
Boselie, Frans、Leeuwenberg, E.(1985)。Birkhoff Revisited: Beauty as a Function of Effect and Means。American Journal of Psychology,98(1),1-39。
12.
Breckler, Steven J.(1994)。A Comparison of Numerical Indexes for Measuring Attitude Ambivalence。Educational and Psychological Measurement,54(2),350-365。
13.
Cacioppo, John T.、Gardner, Wendi L.、Berntson, Gary G.(1997)。Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space。Personality and Social Psychology Review,1(1),3-25。
14.
Conner, Mark、SPARKS, PAUL、POVEY, RACHEL、JAMES, RHIANNON、SHEPHERD, RICHARD、Armitage, Christopher J.(2002)。Moderator effects of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude–behaviour relationships。European Journal of Social Psychology,32(5),705–718。
15.
Gardner, P. L.(1987)。Measuring ambivalence to science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,24(3),241-247。
16.
Hekkert, Paul(2006)。Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design。Psychology Science,48(2),157-172。
17.
Jonas, Klaus、Broemer, Philip、Diehl, Michael(2000)。Experienced Ambivalence as a Moderator of the Consistency Between Attitudes and Behaviors。Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie,31(3),153-165。
18.
Nordgren, Loran F.、van Harreveld, Frenk、van der Pligt, Joop(2006)。Ambivalence, discomfort, and motivated information processing。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,42(2),252-258。
19.
Priester, Joseph R.、Petty, Richard E.(1996)。The Gradual Threshold Model of Ambivalence: Relating the Positive and Negative Bases of Attitudes to Subjective Ambivalence。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71(3),431-449。
20.
Reisenzein, Rainer(1994)。Pleasure-Arousal Theory and the Intensity of Emotions。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67(3),525-539。
21.
Russell, James A.(1978)。Evidence of convergent validity on the dimensions of affect。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36(10),1152-1168。
22.
Whissell, C. M.(1981)。Pleasure and activation revisited: Dimensions underlying semantic responses to fifty randomly selected "emotional" words。Perceptual and motor skills,53,871-874。
23.
Yorke, Mantz(2001)。Bipolarity…or not? Some Conceptual Problems Relating to Bipolar Rating Scales。British Educational Research Journal,27(2),171-186。
圖書
1.
Fiell, Charlotte、Fiell, Peter(1997)。1000 Chairs。Taschen。
2.
Berlyne, D. E.(1971)。Aesthetics and Psychobiology。New York, NY:Appleton-Century-Crofts。
3.
Osgood, Charles Egerton、Suci, George John、Tannenbaum, Percy H.(1957)。The Measurement of Meaning。Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press。
4.
Geldard, Frank Arthur(1953)。The human senses。The human senses。New York, NY:Wiley。
5.
Thayer, R. E.(1989)。The biopsychology of mood and activation。The biopsychology of mood and activation。New York。
其他
1.
Ambiguity。
2.
Contradiction。
圖書論文
1.
Thompson, M. M.、Zanna, M. P.、Griffin, D. W.(1995)。Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence。Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences。Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
以紮根理論探索微互動的設計手法
2.
語意不一致、曖昧及一致的產品特徵與認知差異
3.
利用事件相關電位偵測語意一致性、曖昧及不一致之差異
4.
意象認知對門把造形之影響
1.
創新策略:矛盾語意及跨領域合作
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
木材視覺意象之研究--以臺灣產商用針葉樹為例
2.
實體產品和影像樣本意象認知差異研究
QR Code