臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國際人權的擴散與實踐：以《國家保護責任》的倡議為例
書刊名：問題與研究
作者：蔡育岱 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tsai, Yu-tai
出版日期：2010
卷期：49:4
頁次：頁135-162
主題關鍵詞：國際人權；人道干預；保護責任；規範；理念；人類安全；International human rights；Humanitarian intervention；R2P；Norm；Idea；Human security
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(7)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:59
  • 點閱點閱:129
權力與國家利益是國際政治研究的主要探討因素，也是國際關係學界戰後研究的起點，本文認為「權力」決定「國家利益」，進而限制「國家行為」的觀點，在國際人權規範下未必依舊是當代國際政治與國家行為的鐵律。從冷戰後國際社會的維持和平行動來看，有相當程度 國家武力干預並非出於國家利益的動機，亦非與地緣戰略有關，而只是為了去維持國際社會的價值，一種強調人權價值、避免種族淨化的發生。這種國際社會的價值（人性尊嚴、法治、民主），某種程度存有所謂規範制約權力的成分，強調權力的使用來自合法性，而這規範 的形塑來自理念的建構。 對一些國家而言，在乎的可能不是體系結構，也不是權力平衡，抑或物質宰制一切，而是如何維持國際社會的價值，並運用理念來操作規範，進而達成對其國家真正的利益。爰本文將重新檢視國際社會中規範、理念與權力的作用，並以《國家保護責任》的倡議為例，從其內 涵與法源基礎論證後冷戰迄今，國際社會並非完全制約在現實主義權力操作下的國際結構因素，而是受制於國際社會中一種價值的規範因素。
Power and national interest constitute an important research topic in the study of international politics, and can be seen as the starting point for the study of international relations in the post-war period. A number of scholars have asserted that “power” determines “national interest.” Such a view, however, can result in an excessively restricted understanding of “national behavior,” since the relationship between contemporary international politics and national behavior is not necessarily an ironclad one. This has been borne out by a number of international efforts to maintain peace in the post-Cold War era. Rather than being driven by national interests or regional strategic concerns, a number of military interventions have been carried out in order to prevent ethnic cleansing, safeguard human rights, and uphold certain other values of the international society. Such international values are based on respect for human dignity, the rule of law, and the ideal of democracy. These values are based on norms restricting the use of power and emphasize that the effective use of power is based on legitimacy. In this paper, the author explores some of the ideas from which these norms are derived. Most states focus their attention on such areas as government structures, material standards of living, and the balance of power. Some states, however, are more concerned with upholding the values of the international community, applying certain principles to the formulation of international norms, and promoting the common good throughout the world. Therefore, the main purpose of this article is exploring a brief discussion of the relevance of norm, idea, and power, analyzing the legal basis of “the Responsibility to Protect” and how the international human rights approach to international norms is currently being implemented and practiced by the international society.
期刊論文
1.Keohane, Robert O.(1988)。International Institutes: Two Approaches。International Studies Quarterly，32(4)，379-396。  new window
2.Simmons, Jessica P.(1998)。Learning to Live With NGOs。Foreign Policy，no. 112，pp.82-96。  new window
3.甘逸驊(20071000)。歐盟「柔性強權」身份認同的建構與批判。問題與研究，46(4)，1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Simon, Steve G.(1993)。The Contemporary Legality of Unilateral Humanitarian Intervention。California Western International Law，24，117-153。  new window
5.Wendt, Alexander E.(1994)。Collective Identity Formation and The International State。American Political Science Review，88(2)，384-396。  new window
6.Wendt, Alexander E.(1992)。Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics。International Organization，46(2)，391-425。  new window
7.蔡育岱、譚偉恩(20080300)。從「國家」到「個人」：人類安全概念之分析。問題與研究，47(1)，151-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Checkel, Jeffrey T.(1999)。Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe。International Studies Quarterly，43(1)，83-114。  new window
9.Acharya, Amitav(2004)。How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Instituional Change in Asian Regionalism。International Organization，58(2)，239-275。  new window
10.Weinert, Matthew S.,(2007)。Bridging the Human Rights-Sovereignty Divide: Theoretical Foundations of a Democratic Sovereignty。Human Rights Review，vol. 8,Issue 2，pp. 5~32。  new window
11.Weiss, Thomas(2004)。The Sunset of Humanitarian Intervention: The Responsibility to Protect in a Unipolar Era。Security Dialogue，vol. 35,no. 2，pp. 135~153。  new window
12.Bannon, Alicia L.(2006)。The Responsibility To Protect: The U.N. World Summit and The Question of Unilateralism。Yale Law Journal，115，1157-1165。  new window
13.Conlon, Justin(2004)。Sovereignty vs. Human Rights or Sovereignty and Human Rights?。Race and Class，46(1)，75-100。  new window
14.Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink(1998)。International Norms and Political Change。International Organization，vol. 52,no. 4，pp. 887~917。  new window
15.Heinze, Eric A.(2006)。Maximizing Human Security: A Utilitarian Argument for Humanitarian Intervention。Journal of Human Rights，5(3)，283-302。  new window
16.Kritsiotis, Dino(1998)。Reappraising Policy Objections to Humanitarian Intervention。Michigan Journal of International Law，vol. 189，pp.1005~1050。  new window
17.Matsukuma, Jun(2005)。Emerging Norms of the Responsibility to Protect。The Seinan Law Reviews，vol. 38,no. 2，pp. 106~118。  new window
18.Merriam, John J.(2001)。Kosovo and the Law of Humanitarian Intervention。Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law，vol. 33,no. 1，pp. 111~154。  new window
19.Mwagiru, Makumi(1994)。International Law, Politics, and the Reinvention of Humanitarian Intervention: the Lesson of Somalia。India Journal of International Law，vol. 34，pp. 33~44。  new window
20.Rogers, APV.(2004)。Humanitarian Intervention and International Law。Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy，no. 27，pp. 725~736。  new window
會議論文
1.Takasu, Yukio(2000)。Toward Effective Cross-sectoral Partnership to Ensure Human Security in a Globalized World。Bangkok。  new window
研究報告
1.Ban, Ki-moon(2009)。Implementing the Responsibility to Protect。  new window
2.,Kravtsov, Vlad(2005)。Understanding Norm Diffusion in the Globalized World: Building Theoretical Framework。  new window
圖書
1.Kaldor, Mary(2007)。Human Security: Reflections on Globalization and Intervention。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
2.蔡育岱、譚偉恩(2006)。現代國際公法精義。台北：晶華文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Frerks, Georg and Berma Klein Goldewijk(2007)。Human Security and International Insecurity。Wageningen：Wageningen Academic Publishers。  new window
4.Wheeler, Nicholas J.(2000)。Saving Stranger: Humanitarian Intervention in International Security。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Macalister-Smith, Peter.(1985)。International Humanitarian Assistance。Dordrecht：Martinus Nijoff。  new window
6.Prendergast, John.(1996)。Frontline Diplomacy: Humanitari an Aid and Conflict in Africa。Boulder：Lynne Rienner。  new window
7.Bull, Hedley、Watson, Adam(1984)。The Expansion of International Society。Oxford:：Oxford University。  new window
8.Snyder, Richard Carlton、Sapin, Burton M.、Bruck, H. W.(1954)。Decision-making as An Approach to the Study of International Politics。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Neack, Laura(2007)。Elusicve Security: States First, People Last。New York：Rowman and Littlefield Publishers。  new window
10.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Johseph S., Jr.(2001)。Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition。New York：Longman。  new window
11.Dannreuther, Roland(2007)。International Security: the Contemporary Agenda。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
12.Tadjbakhsh, Shahrbanou、Chenoy, Anuradha M.(2007)。Human Security: Concepts and Implications。London：Routledge。  new window
13.Morgenthau, Hans J.(1979)。Human Rights and Foreign Policy。New York：Council on Religion and International Affairs。  new window
14.Carr, Edward H.(1956)。The Twenty Years Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations。London：Macmillan。  new window
15.Waltz, Kenneth(1978)。Theory of International Politics。Reading, Mass：Addison-Wesley。  new window
16.Wendt, Alexander E.(1999)。Social Theory of International Politics。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。  new window
17.Donnelly, Jack(2003)。Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice。Ithaca, New York：Cornell University Press。  new window
18.Morgenthau, Hans J.、Thompson, Kenneth W.(1985)。Politics among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace。New York：McGraw-Hill。  new window
19.Bull, Hedley(1977)。The Anarchical society: A Study of Order in World Politics。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
20.Keohane, Robert O.(1989)。International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory。Westview Press。  new window
21.Suarez, Francisco(1935)。De Legibus ac de Deo Legislatore。The Catholic Tradition of the Law of Nations。London。  new window
22.Wheeler, Nicholas J.(2006)。The Humanitarian Responsibilities of Sovereignty: Explaining the Development of a New Norm of Military Intervention for Humanitarian Purposes in International Society。Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations。Oxford。  new window
23.宋燕輝(2004)。「人類安全的概念、國家發展與國家實踐」。人類安全。台北。  延伸查詢new window
24.袁易(2004)。中國遵循國際導彈建制的解析：一個社會建構的觀點。台北。  延伸查詢new window
25.Berenskoetter, Felix and M.J. Williams eds.(2007)。Power in World Politics。New York。  new window
26.Dallaie, Roméo and Brent Beardsley(2003)。Shake Hands with the Devil: the Failure of Humanity in Rwanda。Toronto。  new window
27.Eppstein, John(1935)。The Catholic Tradition of the Law of Nations。London。  new window
28.Franck, Thomas M.,(2003)。Interpretation and Change in the law of Humanitarian Intervention。Humanitarian Intervention, Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas。Cambridge。  new window
29.Habermas, Jürgen(1984)。Theory of Communication Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society。London。  new window
30.High-level Panel on Threats(2004)。A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility。New York。  new window
31.Lischer, Sarah K.(2005)。Dangerous Sanctuaries: Refugee Camps, Civil War, and the Dilemmas of Humanitarian Aid。New York。  new window
32.Luck, Edward C.(2006)。Un Security Council: Practice and Promise。New York。  new window
33.MacFarlane, S. Neil and Yuen Foong Khong(2006)。Human Security and the UN。Bloomington and Indianapolis。  new window
其他
1.The International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty(2001)。The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty，Ottawa：International Development Research Center of the International Commission on Intervention and State。，http://www.iciss.ca/pdf/Commission-Report.pdf， 2009/03/21。  new window
2.Annan, Kofi(1999)。Two Concepts of Sovereignty。  new window
圖書論文
1.Finnemore, M.(1996)。Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
2.Jepperson, Ronald L.、Wendt, Alexander、Katzenstein, Peter Joachim(1996)。Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。Columbia University Press。  new window
3.Gorman, Robert F.(1993)。Introduction: Refugee Aid and Development in a Global Context。Refugee Aid and Development: Theory and Practice。Westport, Conn.：Greenwood Press。  new window
4.Sikkink, Kathryn(2005)。The Power of Principled Ideas: Human Rights Policies in the United States and West Europe。Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change。Ithaca：Cornell University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：725（臺灣：721，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2241491 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68037333
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上