:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Is "Rights as Response" an Adequate Account of the Origin of Rights? A Reply to Jack Donnelly
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:雷敦龢 引用關係
作者(外文):Ryden, Edmund
出版日期:2010
卷期:28:2
頁次:頁1-47
主題關鍵詞:權利價值國家市場普遍性RightsValuesStateMarketUniversality
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:55
傑克•納利認為人權是為了回應現代國家所產生的。本文先說明此論點,按照唐納利所強調的國家與市場兩個產生人權的來源加分析,並承認杜那利論說的基本目標在於確定人權的普遍性格。國家與其缺點的普遍化使人權自然產生回應。不過,本文認為杜那利的論述無法說明人權的本質。作為價值與法律之間的特殊產物,人權的產生只能在歐洲中世紀的環境中才得到圓滿的解釋。
Jack Donnelly's presentation of rights as response to the formation of the modern state is a familiar thesis. This essay expounds the thesis to justify it and present the ways in which rights can be seen as a reaction of the state and the market. It also notes that the value of this argument is that it gives a justification for the universality of human rights by basing this on the universality of the modern state and its shortcomings. However, the paper challenges this version of the origin of rights as inadequate. It argues that rights have a peculiar status between values and laws that can only be accounted for by understanding the positive factors that led to their growth in the European Middle Ages.
期刊論文
1.雷敦龢(20040500)。Retention or Abolition of the Death Penalty: An Enquiry into the Fundamental Philosophy of Human Rights。哲學與文化,31(5)=360,103-131。new window  new window
2.Donnelly, Jack(2007)。The Relative Universality of Human Rights。Human Rights Quarterly,29(2),281-306。  new window
3.Ryden, Edmund.(2008)。“An Aesthetic Approach to Human Rights: A Reply to Conor Gearty’s Hamlyn Lectures.”。Journal of Holistic Education,2(January),55-84。  new window
圖書
1.Paine, Thomas、Collins, Henry(1984)。Rights of Man。Penguin Group。  new window
2.Cholewinski, Ryszard.(1997)。Migrant Workers in International Human Rights Law。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.陳來(2006)。傳統與現代--人文主義的視界。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Küng, Hans(1998)。Global Ethic for Global Politics and Economics。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Giddens, Anthony(1985)。The Nation-State and Violence。Polity Press。  new window
6.Hobsbawm, Eric John(1992)。Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Donnelly, Jack(2003)。Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice。Ithaca, New York:Cornell University Press。  new window
8.Holsti, Kalevi J.(1991)。Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648-1989。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.桓寬(1971)。《鹽鐵論》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
10.雷敦龢(2008)。人權思想史。輔仁大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.Bartlett, Robert.(2000)。England under the Norman and Angevin Kings: England 1075-1225。Oxford。  new window
12.Brett, Annabel S.(1997)。Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought。Cambridge。  new window
13.Churchill, Winston S.(2007)。The World Crisis。London。  new window
14.Coleman, John A.(2007)。Ladany Lectures 2007: An Overview of Globalization Theory。Hsinchuang。  new window
15.Copleston, Frederick.(1960)。A History of Philosophy, Vol VI: Wolff to Kant。Westminster MD。  new window
16.De Bary, William T. and Tu Weiming.(1997)。Confucianism and Human Rights。New York。  new window
17.Donnelly, Jack.(1995)。“State Sovereignty and International Intervention: The Case of Human Rights.”。Beyond Westpahlia?。Baltimore。  new window
18.Dufrenne, Mikel.(1967)。Phénoménologie de l’expérience esthétique。Paris。  new window
19.Friedman, Lawrence M.(2006)。“Human Rights and Modern Legal Culture.”。Human Rights in the Pacific Rim: Imagining a New Critical Discourse。Hsinchuang。  new window
20.Hochschild, Adam(1998)。King Leopold’s Ghost。London。  new window
21.Jones, Edwin(2003)。The English Nation: The Great Myth。Stroud:Sutton。  new window
22.Las Casas Bartolomé de.(1992)。The Devastation of the Indies。Baltimore。  new window
23.Scott, James Brown.(2000)。The Spanish Origins of International Law: Francisco de Vitoria and his Law of Nations。New Jersey。  new window
24.Tierney, Brian.(1997)。The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law and Church Law 1150-1625。Grand Rapids。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE