:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:森林步道環境特性對心理評價反應之影響
書刊名:戶外遊憩研究
作者:江彥政 引用關係張俊彥歐聖榮
作者(外文):Chiang, Yen-chengChang, Chun-yenOu, Sheng-jung
出版日期:2011
卷期:24:2
頁次:頁75-100
主題關鍵詞:環境資訊景觀偏好危險害怕Environmental informationLandscape preferenceDangerFear
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:44
森林步道環境不僅帶給人舒適感,可能會因爲某些環境特性,而產生一些害怕之事物或情境,如迷路、落石、動植物威脅等。爲瞭解森林步道環境資訊、知覺、情境擔心對心理評價之影響,本研究以60張彩色森林步道照片作爲測試媒體,共獲得519位有效樣本。經典型相關分析後發現環境資訊之自然度與情境擔心(環境安全擔心、社會犯罪威脅、野生生物威脅和方向感)呈正相關,而開放度、視覺可及性和移動可及性與情境擔心均呈負相關;複雜性和神秘性與偏好間具正向相關;自然度和複雜性與危險和害怕間具正相關;視覺可及性和移動可及性與偏好具正相關,但與危險和害怕具負相關;而情境擔心與危險和害怕間達顯著正相關。從研究結果可得知,景觀的視覺穿透能力爲主要影響因子,尤其是林木間的視覺可及程度,因此未來在森林步道和公園植栽設計時建議需謹慎考量。
Forest trail not only provides a comfortable feeling for people, it also evokes specific fear of events or situations by certain environmental property for instance, getting lost, falling debris, and threatened by wild animal and plant. To understand influences of environmental information, perception, and situational concern on psychological evaluation in forest trails, there were sixty color slides to be collected as stimuli. Through convenient sampling, the study obtained 519 valid samples who took general courses in college. After performing canonical analysis, the results found that the naturalness of environmental information positively correlated with situational concerns (e.g., environmental safety concern, criminal threat, wildlife threat, and direction). However, openness, visual access, and locomotive access had negative correlations with situation concerns. Moreover, complexity and mystery were positively correlated with preference that was similar to the previous findings. Furthermore, the result indicated that the high level of naturalness and complexity had positively effects on the rise of danger and fear. Both access of visual and locomotive had positive correlations with preference, but negative correlations with danger and fear. As the results implied, visual penetration is a key factor in the given scene, particularly the level of visual access between trees. Therefore, considerations need to be sufficiently adopted when planting design of forest trail and park in the future.
期刊論文
1.Bixler, R. D.、Floyd, M. F.(1997)。Nature is scary, disgusting, and uncomfortable。Environment and Behavior,29(4),443-467。  new window
2.Talbot, J. F.、Kaplan, S.(1986)。Perspectives on wilderness: Re-examining the value of extended wilderness experiences。Journal of Environmental Psychology,6(3),177-188。  new window
3.Herzog, Thomas R.、Kropscott, Laura S.(2004)。Legibility, mystery, and visual access as predictors of preference and perceived danger in forest settings without pathways。Environment and Behavior,36(5),659-677。  new window
4.Herzog, T. R.、Gale, T. A.(1996)。Preference for urban buildings as a function of age and nature context。Environment and Behavior,28(1),44-72。  new window
5.Schroeder, H. W.、Anderson, L. M.(1984)。Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites。Journal of Leisure Research,16(2),178-194。  new window
6.Tooby, J.、Cosmides, L.(1990)。The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environment。Ethology and Sociobiology,11(4/5),375-424。  new window
7.Hull, R. B. IV、Stewart, W. P.(1992)。Validity of Photo-based Scenic Beauty Judgments。Journal of Environmental Psychology,12(2),101-114。  new window
8.Herzog, T. R.、Bryce, A.(2007)。Mystery and preference in within-forest settings。Environment and Behavior,39(6),779-796。  new window
9.Herzog, Thomas R.、Kutzli, Glenn E.(2002)。Preference and Perceived Danger in Field/Forest Settings。Environment And Behavior,34(6),819-835。  new window
10.Stamps, A. E. III(2005)。Visual permeability, locomotive permeability, safety, and enclosure。Environment and Behavior,37(5),587-619。  new window
11.van den Berg, A. E.,、Ter Heijne, M.(2005)。Fear versus fascination: An exploration of emotional responses to natural threats。Journal of Environmental Psychology,25(3),261-272。  new window
12.Sommer, R.、Summit, J.、Clements, A.(1993)。Slide ratings of street tree attributes: Some methodological issues and answers。Landscape Journal,12(1),17-22。  new window
13.陳惠美、林晏州(19970600)。景觀知覺與景觀品質關係之研究。造園學報,4(1),1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.張俊彥、萬麗玲(20000800)。景觀型態對肌電值及注意力恢復能力之研究。造園學報,7(1),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Herzog, T. R.、Black, A. M.、Fountaine, K. A.、Knotts, D. J.(1997)。Reflection and Attentional Recovery as Distinctive Benefits of Restorative Environments。Journal of Environmental Psychology,17(2),165-170。  new window
16.Zajonc, R. Bob(1980)。Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences。American Psychologist,35(2),151-175。  new window
17.Purcell, A. T.、Lamb, R. J.、Peron, E. Mainardi、Falchero, S.(1995)。Preference or preferences for landscape。Journal of Environmental Psychology,14(3),57-63。  new window
18.Hartig, Terry Alan、Mang, Marlis、Evans, Gary W.(1991)。Restorative effects of natural environment experiences。Environment and Behavior,23(1),3-26。  new window
19.Miller, George A.(1956)。The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information。The Psychological Review,63(2),81-97。  new window
20.江彥政、歐聖榮、張俊彥、翁珮怡(2009)。自然環境資訊、情境擔心與偏好之關係研究。造園景觀學報,15(4),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.張俊彥、彭家麟(2000)。不同景觀型態剌激生心理反應差異之研究--一個案例研究。中國園藝,46(1),93-102。  延伸查詢new window
22.Agras, W. S.、Sylvester, D.、Oliveau, D.(1969)。The epidemiology of common fears and phobias。Comprehensive Psychiatry,10(2),151-156。  new window
23.Angyal, A.(1941)。Disgust and related aversions。Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,36(3),393-412。  new window
24.Bixler, R. D.、Floyd, M. F.、Hammitt, W. E.(1995)。Feared stimuli are expected in specific situations: The use of situationalism and fear expectancy in a self-report measurement of fears。Journal of Clinical Psychology,51(4),544-547。  new window
25.Fabos, J. G.(1979)。Planning and landscape evaluation。Landscape Research,4(2),4-10。  new window
26.Fisher, B. S.、Nasar, J. L.(1995)。Fear spots in relation to microlevel physical cues: Exploring the overlooked。Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,32(2),214-239。  new window
27.Hershberger, R. G.、Cass, R. C.(1973)。The adequacy of various media as representations of the designed environment。Man-Environment Systems,3(5),371-372。  new window
28.Herzog, T. R.、Chemick, K. K.(2000)。Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings。Journal of Environmental Psychology,20(1),29-39。  new window
29.Herzog, T. R.、Kirk, K. M.(2005)。Pathway curvature and border visibility as predictors of preference and danger in forest settings。Environment and Behavior,37(5),620-639。  new window
30.Herzog, Thomas R.、Miller, Edward J.(1998)。The role of mystery in perceived danger and environmental preference。Environment and Behavior,30(4),429-449。  new window
31.Kuo, F. E.、Bacaicoa, M.、Sullivan, W. C.(1998)。Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference。Environment and Behavior,30(1),28-59。  new window
32.McCathie, H.、Spence,S. H.(1991)。What is the revised fear survey schedule for children measuring?。Behavior Research and Therapy,29(5),495-502。  new window
33.Ohman, A.、Mineka, S.(2003)。The malicious serpent: Snakes as a prototypical stimulus for an evolved module of fear。Current Directions in Psychological Science,12(1),5-9。  new window
34.Perkins, D. D.、Meeks, J. W.、Taylor, R. B.(1992)。The physical environment of street blocks and resident perceptions of crime and disorder: Implications for theory and measurement。Journal of Environmental Psychology,12(1),21-34。  new window
35.Seligman, M. E. P.(1971)。Phobias and preparedness。Behavior Therapy,2(3),307-320。  new window
36.Stamps, A. E.(1990)。Use of photographs to simulate environments: A meta-analysis。Perceptual and Motor Skills,71,907-913。  new window
37.Stamps, A. E.(2004)。Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis。Journal of Environmental Psychology,24(1),1-16。  new window
38.Taylor, R. B.、Shumaker, S. A.、Gottfredson, S. D.(1985)。Neighborhood-level links between physical features and local sentiments: Deterioration, fear of crime, and confidence。Journal of Architectural Planning and Research,2(4),261-275。  new window
39.Woodcock, D. M.(1984)。A functionalist approach to landscape preference。Landscape Research,9(1),24-27。  new window
學位論文
1.李建民(2001)。台灣地區國家公園遊客被害恐懼感形成因素之研究--以陽明山國家公園為例(碩士論文)。中央警察大學,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.、Black, William C.(1998)。Multivariate Date Analysis。Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
2.黃俊英(1991)。多變量分析。台北:中國經濟研究院。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kaplan, S.、Kaplan, R.(1982)。Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World。New York, NY:Praeger。  new window
4.Appleton, Jay(1975)。The Experience of Landscape。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
5.Kaplan, Rachel、Kaplan, Stephen(1989)。The experience of nature: A psychological perspective。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.交通部觀光局(2007)。中華民國96年國人旅遊狀況調查。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Ulrich, Roger S.(1983)。Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment。Human behavior and environment, vol.6: Behavior and natural environment。New York, NY:Plenum Press。  new window
2.Ulrich, Roger S.(1993)。Biophilia, Biophobia, and Natural Landscapes。The Biophilia Hypothesis。Island Press/Shearwater。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top