資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.147.48.244)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
發揮預防的力量:風險評估作為高風險家庭服務的一種實務方法
書刊名:
朝陽人文社會學刊
作者:
高麗鈞
作者(外文):
Kao, Li-chung
出版日期:
2011
卷期:
9:1
頁次:
頁177-197
主題關鍵詞:
風險評估
;
高風險家庭服務
;
韌力觀點
;
Risk assessment
;
High-risk families service
;
Resilience
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
3
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
3
共同引用:0
點閱:39
個案工作者在執行家庭風險調查必須儘可能達至精確,以提昇預防效力。據內政部(2009)「推動高風險家庭關懷處遇計劃」中針對基層的通報單位,所訂立的「高風險家庭評估表」作為篩選轉介的參照標準,除何謂「高風險家庭」無明確定義;其功能實屬通報指標;另其中的開案、處遇及結案建議,因過於概括性而未能有具體及標準的量化指引供裁定,致今天的個案工作者在缺乏「風險評估模式」,以評定家庭是否處於風險中,而可能面臨最困難的決定,如何謂「高風險家庭」、高風險家庭開案、結案及服務決定的標準是如何的窘境。故,除非在「高風險家庭預防服務」中提供明確的高風險家庭的定義、風險評估指標及評量的基礎訓練,才是解決「高風險家庭」之個案工作者工作困境的可能。鑑此,本文探討的重點,為「風險評估」納入高風險家庭預防服務的意義與重要理由,並以「韌力」的觀點,應用於解析高風險家庭中,評量可能的風險、保護因子與程度,作為執行家庭風險調查的立基,以增益預防的力量,另提出相關議題的討論與建議。
以文找文
Case workers must conduct a precise risk assessment of family risk to enhance the prevention effects. According to the Ministry of Interior (2009) "intervention projects should emphasize the care of high-risk families." A standard method of assessment is required to assess families as being high risk to refer them for services. However, there is no official definition for what is considered a "high-risk family," which is necessary to develop the standard assessment. Additionally, because the intervention suggestions are too general or inadequate, standard guidelines cannot be developed. Therefore, a complete risk assessment model to assess whether a family is at risk is lacking. As a result, today's case workers lack a risk assessment model and face difficult decisions of deciding whether a family is at risk; for example, whether to open and terminate services to families no longer considered high-risk.To solve this issue, case workers must be given basic training on how to evaluate, and an evaluation index of risk and the explicit definition of a high-risk family must be developed and implemented in services for high-risk families.The purpose of this article is to evaluate the functions and reasons for high-risk family services, analyze the effectiveness of high-risk family services, and assess the possibility and extent of risk with the view of resilence to provide an importance reference for projects. Finally, this study concludes that to prevent risk, a risk assessment for high-risk family services must be developed and implemented.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Smokowski , P. R.、Mann, E. A.、Reynold, A. J.、Fraser , M. W.(2004)。Childhood risk and protective factors and late adolescent adjustment in inner city minority youth。Children and Youth Services Review,26(1),63-91。
2.
Baird, C.、Wagner, D.、Healy, T.、Johnson, K.(1999)。Risk assessment in child protective services: consensus and actuarial model reliability'。Child Welfare,78(6),723-748。
3.
English, D. J.、Pecora, P. J.(1994)。Risk Assessment as a Practice Method in Child Protective Services。Child Welfare,73(5),451-473。
4.
Camasso, M. J.、Jagannathan, R.(2000)。Modeling the reliability and predictive validity of risk assessment in child protective services。Children and Youth Services Review,22,873-896。
5.
Turner, S. G.(2001)。Resilience and social work practice: Three case studies。Families in society,82(5),441-448。
6.
Walsh, Froma(2002)。A family resilience framework: Innovative practice applications。Family Relations,51(2),130-137。
7.
Saleebey, Dennis(1996)。The strengths perspective in social work practice: extensions and cautions。Social Work,41(3),296-305。
8.
Munro, E.(2004)。A simpler way to understand the results of risk assessment instruments。Children and Youth Services Review,26 (9),877-887。
9.
Brissett-Chapmanl,S.(1997)。Child protection risk assessment and African American Children: Cultural ramifications for families and communities。Child Welfare,76 (1),45-64。
10.
DePanfilis, D.、Scannapieo, M.(1994)。Assessing the safety of children at risk of maltreatment: Decision-making models。Child Welfare,73 (3),229-237。
11.
Dumka, L. E.、Roosa, M. W.、Mchiels, M. L.、Suh, K. W.(1995)。Using researach and theory to develop prevention programs for high risk families。Family Relations,44 (1),78-86。
12.
Swick , K. J.(2008)。Empowering the parent-child relationship in homeless and other high-risk parents and families。Early Childhood Educ J,36,149-153。
13.
Turner, L. A、Powell, A. E、Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J、Carson, J.(2009)。Helping families initiative:Intervening with high-risk students through a community, and district attorney partnership。Child Adolesc Soc Work,26,209-223。
圖書
1.
Saleebey, D.(2002)。The strengths perspective in social work practice。Boston, MA:NY:Allyn & Bacon:Longman。
2.
Zastrow, C. H.(1999)。The practice of social work。California:Brooks/Cole。
3.
Wolin, Steven J.、Wolin, Sybil(1993)。The Resilient Self: How Survivors of Troubled Families Rise above Adversity。New York:Villard Books。
4.
Kaplan, L、Girard, J. L.(1994)。Strengthening high-risk families: A handbook for practitioners。New York:Lexington Books。
其他
1.
內政部兒童局(2011)。內政部網站統計報告公佈數據,http://www.moi.gov.tw/w3/stat/home.asp/。
延伸查詢
2.
內政部兒童局(2009)。高風險家庭關懷輔導處遇實施計劃,http://www.moi.gov.tw/w3/stat/home.asp/。
延伸查詢
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
社會工作「正向」理論與實務--以復原力為例
2.
從支持網絡觀點來看災變網絡建構之探討
3.
從國小教師觀點探討與高風險家庭關懷輔導處遇方案社工之協同合作經驗
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code