:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:科學性指認研究的發展、理論與共識
書刊名:警學叢刊
作者:黃鈞隆
作者(外文):Huang, Jun-long
出版日期:2011
卷期:42:3=199
頁次:頁153-170
主題關鍵詞:指認指認信心指認錯誤指認可塑性相關判斷法Eyewitness identificationEyewitness confidenceEyewitness errorEyewitness misidentificationFalse eyewitness identificationConfidence malleabilityRelative judgment process
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:58
期刊論文
1.吳巡龍(2005)。審判外指認之證據能力與門山指認法則(Mason Test):雜評最髙法院92年台上字第2978號判決。月旦法學雜誌,123,251-262。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bradfield, A. L.、Wells, G. L.、Olson, E. A.(2002)。The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy。Journal of Applied Psychologyt,87,112-120。  new window
3.Deffenbacher, K. A.、Bornstein, B. H.、Penrod, S. D.、MeGorty, E. K.(2004)。A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory。Law and Human Behavior,28(6),687-706。  new window
4.Huff, R.、Rattner, A.、Sagarin, E.(1986)。Guilty until proven innocent。Crime and Delinquency,32,518-544。  new window
5.Kassin, S. M.、Tubb, V. A.、Hosch, H. M.、Memon, A.(2001)。On the general acceptance of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts。American Psychologist,56(5),405-416。  new window
6.Klobuchar, A.、Steblay, N. K. M.、Caligiuri, H. L.(2006)。Improving eyewitness identifications: Hennepin county's blind sequential lineup pilot project。Cardozo Public Law, Policy and Ethics Journal \url\http://web.augsburg.edu/~steblay/Improving_Eyewitness_Identifications.pdf $d20110616,4381-413。  new window
7.Leippe, M. R.、Wells, G. L.、Ostrom, T. M.(1978)。Crime seriousness as a determinant of accuracy in eyewitness identification。Journal of Applied Psychology,63,345-351。  new window
8.Luus, C. A, E.、Wells, G. L.(1994)。The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects。Journal of Applied Psychology,79,714-724。  new window
9.Malpass, R. S.、Devine, P. G.(1981)。Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender。Journal of Applied Psychology,66,482-489。  new window
10.Meissner, C. A.、Brigham, J. A.(2001)。Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review。Psychology, Public Policy, & Law,7(1),3-35。  new window
11.Morgan, C. A.、Hazlett, G.、Doran, A.、Garrett, S.、Hoyt, G.、Thomas, P.、Baranoski, M.、Southwick, S. M.(2004)。Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress。International Journal of Law and Psychiatry,27,265-279。  new window
12.Schacter, D. L.、Dawes, R.、Jacoby, L. L.、Kahneman, D.、Lempert, R.、Roediger, H. L.、Rosenthal, R.(2008)。Policy forum: Studying eyewitness investigations in the field。Law and Human Behavior,32(1),3-5。  new window
13.Shaw, J. S.、McClure, K. A.(1996)。Repeated postevent questioning can lead to elevated levels of eyewitness confidence。Law and Human Behavior \url\http://www.springerlink.com/content/m8223165750m4466/ $d20110712,20(6),629-653。  new window
14.Steblay, N. M.(1992)。A Meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect。Law and Human Behavior,16(4),413-424。  new window
15.Wells, G. L.(1978)。Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables。Journal of Experimental Psychology,36(12),1546-1557。  new window
16.Wells, G. L.、Leippe, M. R.、Ostrom, T. M.(1979)。Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup。Law and Human Behavior,3,285-293。  new window
17.Wells, G. L.(1993)。What do you know about eyewitness identification?。American Psychologist,48,553-571。  new window
18.Wells, G. L., & Luus, C. A. E.(1990)。Police lineup as experiments: Social methodology as a framework for properly-conducted lineups。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,16,106-117。  new window
19.Wells, G. L.(1995)。Scientific study of witness memory: Implications for public and legal policy。Psychology, Public Policy and Law,1,726-731。  new window
20.Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C, A. E.(1998)。Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads。Law and Human Behavior,22(6),1-39。  new window
21.Yarmey, D.(2003)。Eyewitness identification: Guidelines and recommendations for identification procedures in the United States and in Canada。Canadian Psychology,44(3),181-189。  new window
圖書
1.Connors, E.、Lundregan, T.、Miller, N.、McEwan, T.(1996)。Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial。Alexandria, VA:U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice。  new window
2.蔡盈貞(2008)。從比較法之觀點論我國的證人指認制度:以美國法為例。法學研究報告合輯:司法官。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Brewer, N.、Weber, N.、Semmler, C.(2005)。Eyewitness identification。Psychology and law: An empirical perspective \\ Brewer, N. ; Williams, K. D. (Eds.)。NY。  new window
4.Culter, B. L.、Penrod, S. D.(1995)。Mistaken identification: The eyewitness, psychology, and law。New York。  new window
其他
1.Mecklenburg, S. H,(2006)。Report to the legislature of the state of Illinois: The Illinois pilot program on sequential double-blind identification procedures。  new window
2.O’Toole, T. P.(2006)。What's the matter with Illinois? How an opportunity was squandered to conduct an important study on eyewitness identification procedures。  new window
3.Thompson, J.(2000)。I was certain, but I was wrong。  new window
4.Zernike, K.(2006)。Study fuels debate over police lineups。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE