:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:警察偵查階段指認程序之實證研究
書刊名:警學叢刊
作者:施志鴻
作者(外文):Shih, Chih-hung
出版日期:2020
卷期:50:6=250
頁次:頁49-72
主題關鍵詞:目擊者指認嫌疑人偏誤錯誤審判Eyewitness identificationSuspect biasWrongful conviction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:2
期刊論文
1.吳巡龍(20050800)。審判外指認之證據能力與「門山指認法則」(Manson Test)--兼評最高法院九十二年度臺上字第二九七八號判決。月旦法學,123,251-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bedau, Hugo Adam、Radelet, Michael L.(1987)。Miscarriages of justice in potentially capital cases。Stanford Law Review,40(1),21-179。  new window
3.Colvin, E.(2009)。Convicting the innocent: A critique of theories of wrongful convictions。Criminal Law Forum,20(2/3),173-192。  new window
4.Loftus, E. F.(1975)。Leading questions and the eyewitness report。Cognitive Psychology,7(4),560-572。  new window
5.梁世興(20040300)。指認程序之研究。中央警察大學法學論集,9,95-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.楊雲驊(20070300)。偵查中之指認程序--評最高法院九四年臺上字第四七八號、九五年臺上字第一一七二號及九五年臺上字第三○二六號等三則判決。臺灣本土法學雜誌,92,103-132。  延伸查詢new window
7.金孟華(20130900)。以心理學研究建構我國指認證據的評價方式。中研院法學期刊,13,279-326。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.朱朝亮(20170900)。指認之證據容許性。月旦法學教室,179,58-60。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳巡龍(20090901)。審判外指認。臺灣法學雜誌,135,209-214。  延伸查詢new window
10.吳巡龍(20120400)。指認--最高法院一百年度臺上字第九二五號刑事判決評析。月旦裁判時報,14,78-84。  延伸查詢new window
11.林信旭(20190700)。關於指認證據。月旦裁判時報,85,65-84。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳祐治(20130100)。一種惡名昭彰之證據:目擊者指認。檢察新論,13,146-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.傅美惠(20190300)。刑事程序中指認法制建構芻議。真理法學論叢,22,1+3-34。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃鈞隆(20110600)。指認錯誤之成因與防治。執法新知論衡,7(1)=13,99-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.黃鈞隆(20111100)。科學性指認研究的發展、理論與共識。警學叢刊,42(3)=199,153-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Brigham, J. C.、Wasserman, A. W.、Meissner, C. A.(1999)。Disputed eyewitness identification evidence: Important legal and scientific issues。Court Review,36(2),12-25。  new window
17.Davis, D.、Loftus, E. F.(2018)。Eyewitness Science in the 21st Century。Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience,1,529-566。  new window
18.Fazel, S.、Wolf, A.、Chang, Z.、Larsson, H.、Goodwin, G. M.、Lichtenstein, P.(2015)。Depression and violence: a Swedish population study。The Lancet. Psychiatry,2(3),224-232。  new window
19.Fitzgerald, R. J.、Price, H. L.、Valentine, T.(2018)。Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups。Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,24(3),307-328。  new window
20.Goodsell, C. A.、Gronlund, S. D.、Neuschatz, J. S.(2015)。Investigating mug shot commitment。Psychology, Crime and Law,21(3),219-233。  new window
21.Gorenstein, G. W.、Ellsworth, P. C.(1980)。Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness。Journal of Applied Psychology,65(5),616-622。  new window
22.Greathouse, S. M.、Kovera, M. B.(2009)。Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification。Law and Human Behavior,33(1),70-82。  new window
23.McNabb, N.、Farrell, B. R.、Brown, C. R.(2017)。Voluntary Adoption of Evidence-Based Practices by Local Law Enforcement: Eyewitness Identification Procedures in Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska。Journal of Gender, Race and Justice,20,509-541。  new window
24.Newirth, K. A.(2016)。An Eye for the Science: Evolving Judicial Treatment of Eyewitness Identification Evidence。Journal of applied research in memory and cognition,5(3),314-317。  new window
25.Steblay, N. K.、Dysart, J. E.、Wells, G. L.(2011)。Seventy-two tests of the sequential lineup superiority effect: A meta-analysis and policy discussion。Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,17(1),99-139。  new window
26.Steblay, N. K.、Wells, G. L.、Douglass, A. B.(2014)。The eyewitness post identification feedback effect 15 years later: Theoretical and policy implications。Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,20(1),1-18。  new window
27.Taylor, S.、Workman, L.、Hall, R.(2018)。To be or Not to be-Culprit or Lookalike that is the Question: Effects of Order on Single, Repetition and Culprit-Absent Sequential Line-ups。Journal of Forensic Research and Analysis,2(1),1-12。  new window
28.Wilson, P. R.(1989)。When justice fails: a preliminary examination of serious criminal cases in Australia。Australian Journal of Social Issues,24(1),3-22。  new window
29.Wells, G. L.、Elizabeth Luus, C.(1990)。Police lineups as experiments: Social methodology as a framework for properly conducted lineups。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,16(1),106-117。  new window
30.Wogalter, M. S.、Malpass, R. S.、Mcquiston, D. E.(2004)。A national survey of U S police on preparation and conduct of identification lineups。Psychology, Crime and Law,10(1),69-82。  new window
31.Schacter, D. L.、Dawes, R.、Jacoby, L. L.、Kahneman, D.、Lempert, R.、Roediger, H. L.、Rosenthal, R.(2008)。Policy forum: Studying eyewitness investigations in the field。Law and Human Behavior,32(1),3-5。  new window
32.Wells, G. L.(1978)。Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables。Journal of Experimental Psychology,36(12),1546-1557。  new window
學位論文
1.李文章(2015)。警察犯罪偵查偏誤之實證研究(博士論文)。中央警察大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cutler, B. L.、Kovera, M. B.(2010)。Evaluating Eyewitness Identification。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.National Research Council of the National Academy(2014)。Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification。The National Academies Press。  new window
3.Police Executive Research Forum(2014)。What U.S. Law Enforcement Officers Know and Believe About Eyewitness Factors, Eyewitness Interviews and Identification。National Institute of Justice。  new window
4.Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence(1999)。Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement: U S Department of Justice。Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice。  new window
5.Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence(2003)。Eyewitness evidence: A trainer's manual for law enforcement。U S Dept, of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice。  new window
6.Yates, S. Q.(2017)。Memorandum for heads of department law enforcement components, all department prosecutors。Washington, D C:Office of the Deputy Attorney General, U S Department of Justice。  new window
其他
1.總統府(20170908)。總統府司法改革國是會議成果報告,https://www.president.gov.tw/File/Doc/1754f2f0-c60d-4de1-a2e3-4c967610bcaa。  延伸查詢new window
2.總統府(2017)。總統府司法改革國是會議司法改革首次半年進度報告,https://www.moj.gov.tw/dl-31639-6fc9c4713d004eaf9124ad3f62a086d2.html。  延伸查詢new window
3.Home Office(2017)。Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) Code D,https://www.gov.uk/govemment/publications/pace-code-d-2017。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wells, G. L.、Loftus, E. F.(2003)。Eyewitness memory for people and events。Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology。New York, NY:Wiley。  new window
2.Bartol, C. R.、Bartol, A. M.(2015)。Eyewitness evidence。Psychology and law: Research and application。California:SEGA Publication。  new window
3.Neuschatz, J. S.、Wetmore, S. A.、Key, K. N.、Cash, D. K.、Gronlund, S. D.、Goodsell, C. A.(2016)。A comprehensive evaluation of showups。Advances in psychology and law。Springer。  new window
4.Pike, G.、Clark, C.(2018)。Identification evidence。The Psychology of Criminal Investigation。Routledge。  new window
5.Steblay, N. K.(2014)。Eyewitness Memory。APA Handbook of Forensic Psychology。Washington, D.C.:American Psychological Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top