:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:思索死亡、看見死亡:《哈姆雷》中鬼魂與骷髏頭的顯影
書刊名:中山人文學報
作者:儲湘君 引用關係
作者(外文):Chu, Hsiang-chun
出版日期:2012
卷期:32
頁次:頁23-50
主題關鍵詞:哈姆雷死亡鬼魂骷髏頭布萊納HamletDeathGhostSkullKenneth Branagh
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:57
「死亡」是《哈姆雷》的中心議題之一,劇中兩段有名的獨白--「啊,願這齷齪透頂的肉體溶解」與「要生存,或不要生存」--具體展現出哈姆雷對生命的困惑與對死亡的嚮往。承襲英國早期現代死亡的哲學傳統,莎劇藉由鬼魂的回訪人間與骷髏頭的出土,讓哈姆雷個人式的冥想具備思考式的哲學對談,劇中骷髏頭往往促使哈姆雷對生命及死亡的意義作更深層、哲學式的探索,而手持骷髏頭的哈姆雷,彷彿在與哲人對話的當下體悟出生與死的意涵,從而超脫生死。某種程度上,骷髏頭所具現的認知功能讓哈姆雷的心靈思考產生思辨性對話。 本文先勾勒英國早期現代死亡的哲學思想,特別是死亡的象徵(memento mori)傳統,然後分析戲劇文本中相關的情節,並以布萊納的莎劇電影《哈姆雷》為例,探究電影文本如何利用視覺影像具現原劇中之生死哲思,將生與死的思辨顯影,抽象式的文字思考如何轉譯為具體可見的影像符號。
Death is one of the thematic concerns of Hamlet. The two famous soliloquies, “O that this too too solid flesh would melt” and “To be or not to be,” pointedly disclose Hamlet’s doubt toward life and longing toward death. Influenced by the philosophy of death in the early modern England, Hamlet depicts how Prince Hamlet engages in a dialogue-like meditation on the philosophy of death initiated by the return of the Ghost and the appearance of Yorick’s skull. In particular, the skull facilitates Hamlet to encounter death and explore its significance. Holding the skull on his hand, Hamlet seems to talk to a wise old man, exchanging philosophical dialogues with it. Through it, Hamlet not only dawns on the significance of life and death, but also frees himself from the entanglement of human mortality. As can be seen, the skull seems to initiate a series of cognitive activities that facilitate a philosophical inquiry within Hamlet’s mind. A brief introduction to the early modern philosophy of death, in particular the tradition of memento mori, is first presented. Next, a reading of the cinematic text of Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet reveals how filmic images embody the philosophy of life and death, and how verbal words turn into visual images.
期刊論文
1.Davidson, Clifford(1977)。Death in His Court: Iconography in Shakespeare’s Tragedies。Studies in Iconography,1,74-86。  new window
2.Frye, Roland Mushat(1979)。Ladies, Gentlemen, and Skulls: Hamlet and the Iconographic Traditions。Shakespeare Quarterly,30(1),15-28。  new window
3.Gellert, Bridget(1970)。The Iconography of Melancholy in the Graveyard Scene of Hamlet。Studies in Pilology,67,57-66。  new window
4.Morris, Harry(1970)。Hamlet as a Memento Mori Poem。PMLA,85,1035-1040。  new window
5.Paster, Gail Kern(2009)。The Pith and Marrow of Our Attribute: Dialogue of Skin and Skull in Hamlet and Holbein'€™s The Ambassadors。Textual Practice,23(2),247-265。  new window
6.邱錦榮(19991200)。Hamlet: Shakespeare at Metaplay。國立臺灣大學文史哲學報,51,223-225+227-253。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Branagh, Kenneth, dir.(1996)。Hamlet。Columbia Pictures。  new window
2.Branagh, Kenneth, dir.(1996)。Hamlet: Screenplay and Introduction。NY:Norton。  new window
3.Davies, Anthony(1994)。Filming Shakespeare's Plays: The Adaptations of Laurence Olivier, Orson Welles, Peter Brook and Akira Kurosawa。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Engel, William E.(1995)。Mapping Mortality: The Persistence of Memory and Melancholy in Early Modern England。Amherst:University of Massachusetts Press。  new window
5.Kliman, Bernice(1988)。Hamlet: Film, TV and Audio Performance。Rutherford, NJ:Fairleigh Dickinson University Press。  new window
6.Neil, Michael(1997)。Issues of Death: Mortality and Identity in English Tragedy。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
7.Saunders, J. B. deC. M.、O'Malley, Charles D.(1973)。The Illustrations from the Works of Andreas Vesalius of Brussels。NY:Dover Publications。  new window
8.Shakespeare, William、Thompson, Ann、Taylor, Neil(2006)。Hamlet。London:Cengage Learning。  new window
9.Sutton, John(2007)。Exograms and Interdisciplinarity: History, the Extended Mind, and the Civilizing Process。The Extended Mind。London:Ashgate。  new window
10.Sutton, John(2002)。Porous Memory and the Cognitive Life of Things。Prefiguring Cyberculture: An Intellectual History。Cambridge:MIT Press。  new window
11.朱靜美(2005)。莎劇獨白裏的鏡頭乾坤:站在世紀之交的《哈姆萊特》。同時代的莎士比亞:語境、互文、多種視域。上海:復旦大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Shakespeare, William、彭鏡禧(2001)。哈姆雷。聯經出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Brodwell, David、Thompson, Hristin(2008)。電影藝術:形式與風格。臺北:麥格羅希爾。  延伸查詢new window
14.Lacan, Jacques(1981)。The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis。Norton Publishers。  new window
15.Althusser, Louis(1986)。Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses。Critical Theory Since 1965。Tallahassee:Florida State University Press。  new window
16.Perkins, D. N.(1993)。Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning。Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations。New York:Cambridge University。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top