臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：著作權法三振條款制度對著作權平衡保護的影響
書刊名：資訊社會研究
作者：葉志良 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yeh, Chih-liang
出版日期：2012
卷期：22
頁次：頁79-115
主題關鍵詞：著作權法；三振條款；著作權警報系統；網路服務提供者民事免責規範；Copyright law；Graduated response；Three strikes；Copyright alerts；DMCA safe harbors
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:54
由於對網路的強烈依賴，中斷網路使用可說是對人民基本權利的侵害。近年媒體與娛樂產業亟欲對網路上著作侵權行為進行各種自律或他律措施。2008年美國唱片業協會為減少對侵權者進行訟爭，與ISP合作採取「三振條款」，由ISP對屢次侵權者進行斷線措施；然此措施恐有違反法律正當程序而飽受批評。2011年7月美國影視聽組織與ISP宣布採納三振條款的進階規範—「著作權警報系統」，一旦發現侵權行為，使用者將收到數階段警告信而自制，對屢勸不聽者雖未要求ISP終止其帳號，但可以「緩解措施」處置；然ISP仍因DMCA避風港規範，為享受免責利益「依附」於著作權人陣營，使被動與弱勢的使用者原可利用與分享的空間逐漸窄化。在著作權體系下，著作權人、ISP與使用者原處於平衡的三角關係遭到破壞。本文從知識流通與查緝盜版的公私權衡進行分析，認為建立著作權體系的平衡保護，始為討論著作權保護的真義所在。
It has been widely acknowledged that disconnection of Internet access is an invasionof fundamental right. Recently the media and entertainment industries were seeking the selfregulatory measures or legislation to curtail the litigations of copyright infringement online. The “Graduated Response” was introduced in 2008 by the right owners jointly with ISPs to implement the measure of Internet disconnection on the repeated infringers. This measure has been criticized for it is lack of due process and proportionality. In July 2011, the big labels and ISPs jointly adopted “Copyright Alert System” and asserted to send multiple notices to the alleged infringer. In spite of not required implementing the disconnection of Internet, ISPs maypunish accused subscribers by the “mitigation measures.” ISPs are gradually partial to the right owners due to the safe harbors stipulated in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. The room for users to fairly use and sharing are reduced and thus the balanced relationship among right owners, ISPs and users has been destroyed. This paper is to discuss how to preserve the public/private interests of knowledge flow and infringement combat and how to build up a wellbalanced copyright protection, so as to discover the core meaning of copyright.
期刊論文
1.Yen, Alfred C.(2000)。Internet service provider liability for subscriber copyright infringement, enterprise liability, and the First Amendment。Georgetown Law Journal，88(6)，1833-1889。  new window
2.王怡蘋(20091000)。著作權法關於網路服務提供者之民事免責規範。月旦法學，173，25-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Bridy, Annemarie(2010)。Graduated response and the turn to private ordering in online copyright enforcement。Oregon Law Review，89(1)，81-132。  new window
4.Lichtman, Douglas、Landes, William(2003)。Indirect liability for copyright infringement: An economic perspective。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology，16(2)，395-410。  new window
5.Yu, P. K.(2010)。The graduated response。Florida Law Review，62，1373-1430。  new window
6.章忠信(20080800)。網路服務提供者著作權侵害責任限制之立法思考與方向。律師雜誌，347，28-44。  延伸查詢new window
7.章忠信(20091000)。二○○九年新修正著作權法簡析--網路服務提供者之責任限制。月旦法學，173，5-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Patry, William(2009)。Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Litman, J.(2006)。Digital copyright: Protecting intellectual property on the Internet。Amherst, NY：Prometheus Books。  new window
3.羅明通(200909)。著作權法論。瑞名印刷公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
5.楊智傑(2010)。著作權法理論與實務。台北：新學林。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Geist, M.(20100126)。Estimating the cost of a three-strikes and you're out system，http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/4731/135。  new window
2.Sookman, B.，Glover, D.(20100120)。Graduated response and copyright: An idea that is right for the times，http://www.barrysookman.com/2010/01/20/graduated-response-and-copyright-an-idea-that-is-right-for-the-times/。  new window
3.王文君(20101211)。網路著作權侵權三振條款比較分析--以法、英、紐立法例為核心(6)--我國網路服務提供者民事免責事由適用之困境。  延伸查詢new window
4.益思科技法律事務所(2010)。ISP協力保護著作權最新立法趨勢之研究期末報告。  延伸查詢new window
5.章忠信(200911)。台灣著作權集體管理團體之發展歷程與未來。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭戎晉(2008)。Web 2.0與法律--部落格(Blog)誹謗議題之研究。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳雍之(2009)。網路服務提供者（ISP）民事免責事由--新修正著作權法建立的『避風港』機制（上）。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊智傑(201005)。著作權濫用與臺灣特殊濫用類型之研究。  延伸查詢new window
9.葉志良(201111)。網路使用者自創內容（user-generated content）對著作權法之影響。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉靜怡(2008)。誰綁架了文化創意。  延伸查詢new window
11.數位時代(200608)。  延伸查詢new window
12.賴文智、王文君(20100902)。著作權領域『三振條款』發展概況。  延伸查詢new window
13.Anderson, N.(2008)。IFPI: "Three strikes" efforts hit worldwide home run。  new window
14.Anderson, N.(2008)。RIAA graduated response plan: Q&A with Cary Sherman。  new window
15.Anderson, N.(2009)。EU adopts "Internet freedom" provision on Internet cut-offs。  new window
16.Bomsel, O.(2010)。The costs and benefits of graduated response in copyright enforcement。  new window
17.Bomsel, O., & Ranaivoson, H.(2009)。Decreasing Copyright Enforcement Costs: The Scope of a Graduated Response。  new window
18.Carroll, M(2011)。Three Strikes Laws Untenable in Practice。  new window
19.De Beer, J., & Clemmer, C(2009)。Global Trends in Online Copyright Enforcement: A Non-Neutral Role for Network Intermediaries?。  new window
20.Fulton, S. III(2010)。Strongest Condemnation Yet of Anti-Counterfeiting, "Three Strikes" from EU。  new window
21.Gallo, L.(2011)。The (Im)possible of “Standard Technical Measures” for UGC Websites。  new window
22.Geist, M.(2011)。UN Report Says Internet Three Strikes Laws Violate International Law。  new window
23.Harris, L.(2009)。Can You‘Ban’People From the Internet?。  new window
24.Hagen, G(2010)。“Modernizing” ISP Copyright Liability。  new window
25.Jansen, G.(2009)。Whose Burden Is It Anyway? Addressing the Needs of Content Owners in DMCA Safe Harbors。  new window
26.Karaganis, J(2011)。Rethinking Piracy。  new window
27.La Rue, F.(2011)。Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of the right to freedom of opinion and expression。  new window
28.Lee, T.(2011)。UN Report: "three strikes" Internet laws violate human rights。  new window
29.Litman, J.(2010)。Real Copyright Reform。  new window
30.McBride, S., & Smith, E.(2008)。Music Industry to Abandon Mass Suits。  new window
31.McSherry, C., & Goldman, E.(2011)。The “Graduated Response” Deal: What if Users Had Been At the Table?。  new window
32.Meyers, B.(2009)。Filtering Systems or Fair Use? A Comparative Analysis of Proposed Regulations for User- Generated Content。  new window
33.Phillips, A(2011)。The Content Industry and ISPs Announce a “Common Framework for Copyright Alerts”: What Does it Mean for Users?。  new window
34.Ross, P.(2009)。ISPs and Graduated Response。  new window
35.Sawyer, M.(2009)。Filters, Fair Use & Feedback: User-Generated Content Principles and the DMCA。  new window
36.Sohn, D.(2009)。ISPs Taking Up New Roles of Taking Down Illegal File Sharers?。  new window
37.Sohn, D.(2010)。Inviting FCC Mission Creep?。  new window
38.Sunder, M(2006)。IP3。  new window
39.Suzor, N., & Fitzgerald, B.(2011)。The Legitimacy of Graduated Response Schemes in Copyright Law。  new window
40.Urban, J., & Quilter, L(2006)。Efficient Process or ‘Chilling Effects’ Takedown Notices Under Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act。  new window
41.Wolford, J.(2011)。Top ISPs Adopt Graduated Response to Piracy, Give Users Six Strikes: AT&T, Comcast, Verizon among the Agreeing Parties。  new window
42.Wu, T.(2007)。Tolerated Use。  new window
43.Yeh, C(201106)。Does the Net Neutrality Really Preserve the Open Internet?: A Critique From the Implications of Broadband Policy。  new window
44.Zilkha, G.(2009)。The RIAA' s Troubling Solution to File-Sharing。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1432（臺灣：1424，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2488187 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68301911
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上