:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:近代中國的自由貿易和保護關稅--「裁釐加稅」的形成過程
書刊名:新史學
作者:岡本隆司
作者(外文):Okamoto, Takashi
出版日期:2011
卷期:22:4
頁次:頁149-181
主題關鍵詞:自由貿易保護關稅釐金裁釐加稅馬建忠Free tradeProtective tariffsLikin taxationTs'aili-chiashuiMa Chien-chung
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:44
對中國發動鴉片戰爭的英國,其所謂「自由貿易」的內容,乃是廢除對交易物資、對象、場所等限制,進出口稅率並非最重要的問題。自1850年清政府建立釐金制度後,英國方面對實現「自由貿易」的目標,開始轉向中國國內的徵稅。對此,清朝方面僅將貿易、「關稅」視為財源,尚未形成保護關稅和關稅自主權的概念。至1870年代,以北洋大臣李鴻章有力幕僚為中心,保護關稅才開始成為政策及輿論的討論焦點。1876年簽訂的《煙台條約》曾規定租界內免除釐金。至1881年9月,中西雙方擬定清朝方面允許免徵洋貨釐金,西方則同意將進口稅率由5%提高為10%,所謂「裁釐加稅」協議幾乎達成。「加稅」和「裁釐」原是兩件不同的事務,在現實談判中運用「裁釐加稅」概念者,以馬建忠為始。基於保護中國商人以奪回利權、致富求強的觀點,馬建忠建議廢止釐金,並相應地提高關稅稅率。然而,這次談判最終不但未達成協議,且直到二十世紀,中國關稅制度都未再出現變革的轉機。在十九世紀末的中國形勢下,西洋的「自由貿易」與清朝的「保護關稅」概念只能以「裁釐加稅」的形式相結合,且只停留在觀念層次,不易落實。為探究其原因,本文將重新考察產生、並持續推行釐金制度的清代中國社會經濟結構。
"Free trade" was the rallying cry of Great Britain as it started the Opium War against China, and the meaning of this cry was the elimination of all restrictions on the goods, clients, and locations of trade. Tariffs as such were not the most important issue for the British. Since the Chinese government had established the likin system in 1850, the British regarded inland taxation in China as a primary obstacle to surmount to achieve their goal of free trade. The Chinese regarded trade and "custom duties" only as financial resources, and had no concept of protective tariffs or tariff autonomy. Only in the 1870s did protective tariffs begin to be discussed as policy options among the staff of Li Hung-chang, the imperial commissioner for Northern Ports. In 1876, China and Britain concluded the Chefoo Convention, which provided that the settlements at the treaty ports were to be exempt from likin taxation. Until September 1881, it was agreed that the Chinese would accepted the exemption of the likin on foreign imported goods, while the foreign countries would agree to raise the tariff from 5 to 10 percent. In other words, a policy of so-called "ts'aili-chiashui" (exempting likin and raising tariffs) was almost agreed to be carried out. At the beginning, Li approved of raising tariffs but objected to exempting likin, and we can see here that chiashui and ts'aili were two different things, not related to each other. In the actual negotiations, ts'aili-chiashui was discussed as a twinned concept due to a memorandum from Ma Chien-chung to Li. From the viewpoint of recovering the concessions and searching for wealth and power, Ma proposed raising the tariff and in return exempting likin to protect Chinese merchants. Thus, his idea of protective tariffs related chiashui to ts'aili, and the idea of a unitary ts'aili-chiashui was established at last. However, no final agreement was reached in these negotiations, and, as well, from that time to the twentieth century, China never had an opportunity to revise tariffs. Under the conditions of the nineteenth century China, the Western idea of free trade and the notion of protective tariffs of the Chinese were coupled to create the mode of ts'aili-chiashui, but at the same time this was only a conceptual plan, not practical one. In order to understand the reasons for this, it is necessary to reexamine the structure of Chinese society and economy during the Ch'ing period that first brought about and maintained the likin system.
期刊論文
1.鄭友揆(1934)。我國海關貿易統計編制方法及其內容之沿革考。社會科學雜誌,5(3),264-296。  延伸查詢new window
2.小瀨一(1989)。19 世紀末,中国開港場間流通の構造── 営口を中心として。社会経済史学,54(5),30-58。  延伸查詢new window
3.副島圓照(1976)。帝国主義と中国関稅稅制度── アヘン戦争より辛亥革命にいたる。人文学報,42,117-136。  延伸查詢new window
4.飯島涉(1993)。「裁釐加稅」問題と清末中国財政── 1902 年中英マッケイ条約交涉の歷史的位置。史学雑誌,102(11),1-32。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.郭廷以(1971)。郭嵩燾先生年譜。郭嵩燾先生年譜。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.坂野正高(2005)。近代中國政治外交史。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.LeFevour, Edward(1970)。Western Enterprise in Late Ch'ing China: A Selective Survey of Jardine, Matheson & Company's Operations, 1842-1895。Cambridge。  new window
4.本野英一(2004)。伝統中国商業秩序の崩壊:不平等条約体制と「英語を話す中国人」。名古屋:名古屋大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.岡本隆司(1999)。近代中国と海関。名古屋:名古屋大学出版会。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hsiao, Liang-lin(1974)。China's Foreign Trade Statistics, 1864-1949。Cambridge, MA:East Asian Research Center, Harvard University。  new window
7.李永勝(2005)。清末中外修訂商約交涉研究。南開大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.何烈(1972)。厘金制度新探。臺北:東吳大學中國學術著作獎助委員會。  延伸查詢new window
9.坂野正高(1970)。近代中国外交史研究。東京:岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
10.彭雨新(1956)。清代關稅制度。武漢:湖北人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.濱下武志(1989)。中國近代經濟史研究--清末海關財政と開港場市場圏。東京:汲古書院。  延伸查詢new window
12.Morrison, John Robert(1834)。Chinese Commercial Guide, Consisting of A Collection of Details Respecting Foreign Trade in China。Canton:Albion Press。  new window
13.中國史學會(1954)。鴉片戰爭。上海:神州國光社。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉錫鴻(1986)。英軺私記。長沙:岳麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
15.李鴻章、吳汝綸(1984)。李文忠公全集。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.濱下武志、高淑娟、孫彬、朱蔭貴(2006)。中國近代經濟史研究:清末海關財政與通商口岸市場圈。南京:江蘇人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.坂野正高(1973)。近代中国政治外交史:ヴァスコ・ダ・ガマから五四運動まで。東京:東京大学出版会。  延伸查詢new window
18.鄭觀應、夏東元(1982)。鄭觀應集。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.郭嵩燾(1981)。郭嵩燾日記。湖南:湖南人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.久保亨、王小嘉、朱蔭貴(2004)。走向自立之路:兩次世界大戰之間中國的關稅通貨政策和經濟發展。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.Wright, Stanley F.、姚曾廙(1958)。中國關稅沿革史。北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
22.Wright, Stanley F.(1938)。China's Struggle for Tariff Autonomy, 1843-1938。Shanghai:Kelly and Walsh。  new window
23.薛福成(1971)。庸盦全集。華文。  延伸查詢new window
24.馬建忠、張豈之、劉厚祜(1960)。適可齋記言。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
25.楊楷(1887)。光緒通商列表。  延伸查詢new window
26.錢恂(1888)。光緒通商綜覈表。  延伸查詢new window
27.薛福成(1985)。庸盦文别集。上海。  延伸查詢new window
28.王爾敏(1998)。晩清商約外交。香港。  延伸查詢new window
29.張宇權(2004)。思想與時代的落差:晚清外交官劉錫鴻研究。天津古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
30.李達(1924)。中國關稅制度論。上海。  延伸查詢new window
31.馬士、張匯文(2000)。中華帝國國際關係史。上海。  延伸查詢new window
32.陳錦江、王笛、張箭、虞和平(1997)。清末現代企業與官商關係。北京。  延伸查詢new window
33.高柳松一郎(1920)。支那関稅制度論。京都。  延伸查詢new window
34.鈴木智夫(1992)。洋務運動の研究── 19 世紀後半の中國における工業化と外交の革新についての考察。東京。  延伸查詢new window
35.波多野善大(1960)。中国近代工業史の研究。京都。  延伸查詢new window
36.久保亨(2004)。戦間期中国自立への模索── 関稅通貨政策と経済発展。東京。  延伸查詢new window
37.Cooke, George W.(1858)。China: being “The Times” Special Correspondence from China in the Years 1857-58。London。  new window
38.Second Historical Archives of China & Institute of Modern History, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences(1990)。Archives of China’s Imperial Maritime Customs, Confidential Correspondence between Robert Hart and James Duncan Campbell, 1874-1907。Beijing。  new window
39.United States, Department of State(1882)。Papers relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, 1881。Washington, D. C.。  new window
40.Morse, Hosea B.(1918)。The International Relations of the Chinese Empire。Shanghai。  new window
41.岡本隆司(2006)。北洋時期的海關與關稅特別會議── 英國外交的看法。北洋時期的中國外交。上海。  延伸查詢new window
42.秋田茂(2004)。パクス‧ブリタニカとイギリス帝国。イギリス帝国と20 世紀。京都。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1966)。四國新檔,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Pelcovits, Nathan A.(1948)。Old China Hands and the Foreign Office,New York。  new window
3.Great Britain。Foreign Office, General Correspondence, China, (1815-1905)。  new window
4.Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers(1871)。China. (No. 5): Correspondence respecting the Revision of the Treaty of Tien-tsin,London。  new window
5.Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers(1859)。Correspondence relative to the Earl of Elgin’s Special Missions to China and Japan, 1857-1859,London。  new window
6.China, Imperial Maritime Customs(1908)。Treaties, Conventions, etc., between China and Foreign States,Shanghai。  new window
7.China, Maritime Customs(1937)。Documents illustrative of the Origin, Development, and Activities of the Chinese Customs Service,Shanghai。  new window
8.(1843)。Chinese Repository,Canton。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE