臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：影音網站著作權侵害與過濾機制衍生爭議之研究
書刊名：東吳法律學報
作者：林利芝 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Li-chih
出版日期：2012
卷期：23:4
頁次：頁89-124
主題關鍵詞：影音網站；資訊儲存服務提供者；過濾機制；通知／取下程序；責任避風港；User-generated video sites；Information storage service provider；The filtering technology；Notice/Take down procedure；ISP safe harbor
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:98
許多影音網站讓使用者生成內容上傳網路與人分享，而我國著作權法之「ISP之民事免責事由」專章對「資訊儲存服務提供者」提供責任避風港。然而隨著現今網際網路的規模日益擴大，除了網友隨意將未經授權的影片上傳供人分享之外，剛被移除的侵權內容又被網友上傳分享，讓身負網路監控責任的權利人難以負荷。影音網站能否主張確實遵守「通知／取下」程序即已履行法定免責要件而取得責任避風港保護，抑或是影音網站應如權利人要求以過濾機制協助部分承擔著作權人監控網路和通知侵權行為的責任，是本文探討重點。此外，本文也將從比較法的角度，探討美國對於影音網站之侵權責任限制的相關規定，做為我國將來規範影音網站的參考。
Many user-generated video sites allow users to upload their user-generated content to share with others online. Recently, the Taiwan Copyright Act was amended to provide ISP liability exemption to a internet service provider for copyright infringement by reason of the storage at the direction of a user of material that resides on a systems or network controlled or operated by the service provider. With increasing expansion of the Internet and the amount of copyright infringement, copyright holders have difficulties to shoulder the burden of identifying acts of copyright infringement online and want to shift the burden of policing to user-generated video sites. This paper addresses whether user-generated video sites' strict compliance with the Notice/Take Down procedure is sufficient to meet the ISP safe harbor exemption requirement. This paper also explores the possibility of shifting the burden of policing to user-generated video sites by requiring user-generated video sites to utilize the filtering technology. This paper also addresses similar user-generated piracy issues in the United States for future legislative reference in regulating user-generated video sites.
期刊論文
1.王怡蘋(20091000)。著作權法關於網路服務提供者之民事免責規範。月旦法學，173，25-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.章忠信(20091000)。二○○九年新修正著作權法簡析--網路服務提供者之責任限制。月旦法學，173，5-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳怡靜、林怡君、孫玉達(2007)。數位時代著作權如何有效保護─美國網際網路服務提供者責任立法及著作權法第512 條安全港條款的實務運用。智慧財產權月刊，107，30-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.葉茂林(2000)。美國「公開表演權」（public performance right）問題之研究。智慧財產權月刊，17，3-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.蕭宏宜(2008)。P2P 業者的刑事責任問題-ezPeer 與Kuro 案判決評析。法令月刊，59(9)，69-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Pawlisz, Ashley S.(2011)。Legislative Update: The Bill of Unintended Consequences: The Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeit Act。DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law，21，283-313。  new window
7.Jansen, Greg(2010)。Whose Burden is it Anyway? Addressing the Needs of Content Owners in DMCA Safe Harbors。Federal Communications Law Journal，62，153-173。  new window
8.Nathenson, Ira S.(2010)。Colloquium: The Second Annual Conference on Innovation and Communication Law: Civil Procedures for a World of Shared and User-Generated Content。U. Louisville L. Rev.，48，911。  new window
9.Adler, Julie(2011)。The Public's Burden in a Digital Age: Pressures on Intermediaries and the privatization of Internet Censorship。J.L. & Pol'y，20，231。  new window
10.Sundell, Jordan(2011)。Tempting the Sword of Damocles: Reimagining the Copyright/DMCA Framework in a UGC World。Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology，12，335-338。  new window
11.Gallo, Lauren G.(2011)。The (Im)possibility of 'Standard Technical Measures' for UGC Websites。Colum. J.L. & Arts，34，283。  new window
12.Helman, Lital(2010)。Pull Too Hard and the Rope May Break: On the Secondary Liability of Technology Providers for Copyright Infringement。Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J.，19。  new window
13.Sawyer, Michael S.(2009)。Copyright: Note: Filters, Fair Use & Feedback: User-Generated Content Principles and the DMCA。Berkeley Tech. L.J.，24，363。  new window
14.Katyal, Sonia K.(2009)。Article: Filtering, Piracy Surveillance and Disobedience。Colum. J. L. & Arts，32，401。  new window
15.Katyal, Sonia K.(2004)。Privacy vs. Piracy。Yale J.L. & Tech.，7，222。  new window
16.Kreimer, Seth F.(2006)。Censorship by Proxy: The First Amendment, Internet Intermediaries, and the Problem of the Weakest Link。U. Pa. L. Rev.，155，11。  new window
17.Urban, Jennifer M.、Quilter, Laura(2006)。Efficient Process of 'Chilling Effects'? Takedown Notices Under Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act。Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J.，22，621。  new window
18.Chik, Warren B.(2011)。Paying It Forward: The Case for a Specific Statutory Limitation on Exclusive Rights for User-Generated Content Under Copyright Law。John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law，11(2)，240-294。  new window
圖書
1.章忠信、國立台灣大學科際整合研究所(2008)。線上音樂與影片之著作權問題。經濟部智慧財產局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1998)。S. REP. NO. 105-190。  new window
2.H.R. Rep. 105-551 (Part 2)。  new window
3.(1997)。WIPO Copyright Treaties Implementation Act; and Online Copyright Liability Limitation Act: Hearing on H.R. 2281 and H.R. 2280 Before the Subcomm. on Courts and Intellectual Property of the H. Comm. on the Judiciary, 105th Cong. 89(statement of Roy Neel, P。  new window
4.Fair Use Principles for User Generated Video Content。  new window
5.User Generated Content Principles。  new window
6.YouTube Copyright system Gone Mad, EFF Prepares to Sue。  new window
7.(20100303)。Unintended Consequences: Twelve Years under the DMCA，https://www.eff.org/wp/unintended-consequences-under-dmca。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：956（臺灣：951，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2196945 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67995614
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上