資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.15.237.246)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
“步入中年的新公共管理:進入矛盾的階段?”
書刊名:
行政:澳門公共行政雜誌
作者:
顏海娜
作者(外文):
Yan, Hai-na
出版日期:
2012
卷期:
25:4=98
頁次:
頁977-989+1111-1125+1214
主題關鍵詞:
新公共管理
;
公共行政
;
政府改革
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:31
In the past 30 years, the New Public Management dominated in both theory and practice of public administration. The NPM movement emerged during 1980s, rose to prominence in the 1990s, and remains viable today in the study and practices of public administration. With the NPM stepping into the middle age, scholars of this field began to rethink profoundly with the reform wave of the NPM and its potential paradoxes. This article mainly focus on the reflection of the NPM. And it tries to answer the three following questions, First, as a global government reform tide, can the NPM become a normative mode? To what extend can it be universal? Second, the NPM promotes decentralization, customer-focused service, and more discretion for managers, but does it really promote the development of substantial democracy? Third, the NPM emphasizes the economic indicators such as efficiency and production, however, will it weaken the accountability of the government to citizens and civil society?
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Kelleher, C. A.(2008)。A Political Consequence of Contracting: Organized Interests and State Agency Decision Making。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,195,579-602。
2.
Kelly, R. M.(1998)。An Inclusive Democratic Polity, Representative Bureaucracies, and the New Public Management。Public Administration Review,58(3),201-208。
3.
Lamothe, M.、Lamothe, S.(2010)。Competing for What? Linking Competition to Performance in Social Service Contracting。American Review of Public Administration,40(3),326-350。
4.
Mehde, V.(2006)。Governance, Administrative Science, and the Paradoxes of New Public Management。Public Policy and Administration,21(4),60-64。
5.
王樂夫、陳幹全(2004)。我國政府公共服務民營化存在問題分析----以公共性為研究視角。學術研究,3,70。
延伸查詢
6.
馬丁.米諾格、查里斯.波里達諾、大衛.休莫(2002)。超越新公共管理(上)。北京行政學院學報,5,93。
延伸查詢
7.
Raadschelders, J. C. N.、Lee, K.-H.(2011)。Trends in the Study of Public Administration: Empirical and Qualitative Observations from "Public Administration Review," 2000-2009。Public Administration Review,71(1),19-33。
8.
Hefetz, A.、Warner, M.(2004)。Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,14(2),171-190。
9.
Wong, Wilson、Welch, Eric(2004)。Does E-government Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Website Openness and Government Accountability。Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions,17(2),275-297。
10.
Weber, Lori M.(2003)。Who Participates and Why? an Analysis of Citizens on the Internet and the Mass Public。Social Science Computer Review,21(1),26-42。
11.
Amirkhanyan, Anna A.、Kim, Hyun Joon、Lambright, Kristina T.(2008)。Does the Public Sector Outperform the Nonprofit and For-Profit sectors? Evidence from a National Panel Study on Nursing Home Quality and Access。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,27(2),326-353。
12.
Eikenberry, A. M.、Kluver, J. D.(2004)。The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk?。Public Administration Review,64(2),132-139。
13.
Terry, Larry D.(1998)。Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement。Public Administration Review,58(3),194-200。
14.
Brudney, J. L.、Fernandez, S.、Ryu, J. E.、Wright, D. S.(2005)。Exploring and explaining contracting out: Patterns among the American states。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,15(3),393-419。
15.
Lynn, Laurence E. Jr.(1998)。The New Public Management: How to Transform a Theme into a Legacy。Public Administration Review,58(3),231-237。
16.
Denhardt, Robert B.、Denhardt, Janet Vinzant(2000)。The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering。Public Administration Review,60(6),549-559。
17.
Kelly, J. M.(2005)。The Dilemma of the Unsatisfied Customer in a Market Model of Public Administration。Public Administration Review,65(1),76-84。
18.
Box, Richard C.、Marshall, Gary S.、Reed, B. J.、Reed, Christine M.(2001)。New Public Management and Substantive Democracy。Public Administration Review,61(5),608-619。
19.
Hood, C.、Peters, B. G.(2004)。The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox?。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,14(3),267-282。
20.
Amstrong, A.(1998)。A comparative analysis: New public management-the way ahead?。Australia Journal of Public Administration,57(2),12-26。
21.
Bradney, J. L.、Wright, D. S.(2002)。Revisiting administrative reform in the American States: the status of reinventing government during the 1990s。Public Administration Review,62(3),353-361。
圖書
1.
Verba, Sidney、Schlozman, Kay Lehman、Brady, Henry E.(1995)。Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。
2.
珍妮特.V.登哈特、羅伯特.B.登哈特、丁煌(2004)。新公共服務:服務,而不是掌舵。中國人民大學出版社。
延伸查詢
3.
National Performance Review(2004)。From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less。Classics of Public Administration。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth。
4.
Moynihan, Donald P.(2008)。The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform。Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press。
5.
Kettl, Donald F.(1993)。Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets。Washington, DC:The Brookings Institution。
6.
Borgmann, Albert(1992)。Crossing the Postmodern Divide。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
財政撙節與公共行政
2.
書評:Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector[網絡治理:公部門的新型態] by Stephen Goldsmith and Willian D. Eggers
3.
全球化與公共行政改革--知識經濟觀點之檢視
4.
從孔恩的典範觀點來看新公共管理是否能替代公共行政
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code