:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:為何而笑?解讀《FHM男人幫》雜誌中的黃色笑話
書刊名:臺灣性學學刊
作者:劉俊佑盧鴻毅 引用關係
作者(外文):Liou, Jyun-youLu, Hung-yi
出版日期:2012
卷期:18:2
頁次:頁51-74
主題關鍵詞:男人黃色笑話雜誌譬喻MaleDirty jokeMagazineMetaphor
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:125
本研究透過內容分析及譬喻分析,試圖瞭解《 FHM(For Him Magazine)男人幫》雜誌中的黃色笑話主要題材為何?刊載的黃色笑話所採用的「譬喻」手法為何?引發哪些思考?本研究先從內容分析切入,分析《 FHM男人幫》雜誌中的黃色笑話的主題,再輔以譬喻分析,針對黃色笑話的意義進行解讀。根據2007.2009年在該雜誌刊登的 101則黃色笑話所進行的分析發現,就黃色笑話的主題而言,以「夫妻情侶篇」最多,共有 29則,占所有樣本的 28.71%;針對笑話「譬喻」所進行的分析則發現,雜誌中的黃色笑話需要代稱的名詞很多,其中以「借喻」的用法最多。本研究認為,從被分析的黃色笑話內容主題及譬喻來看,可以瞭解黃色笑話隱約反映台灣社會對性議題的好奇,也試圖透過黃色笑話展現台灣人獨特的創意與幽默。
The current study analyzes the theme, metaphor, and inspiration of the dirty jokes in For Him Magazine (FHM), which is popular with young guys in Taiwan. Content analysis was employed to reveal the dirty joke themes, and then metaphor rendition was adopted to decode their meanings. 101 dirty jokes published in FHM from 2007 to 2009 were analyzed in this study. Results of content analyses reveal that 29 dirty jokes are related to “spouse/male-female relationship” (accounting for 28.71% of the 101 dirty jokes analyzed). Metaphor analysis also shows that analogies have been used to narrate the plot of a story or to describe a certain thing, as a dirty joke is initiated. This study, therefore, finds that dirty jokes in FHM, reflects, to some degree, the curiosity of sex issues, and the sense of humor and creativity among Taiwanese.
期刊論文
1.陳學志、王慶中(2005)。笑話與幽默。應用心理研究,26,55-56。  延伸查詢new window
2.翟本端(2001)。江西漢網上巧遇台灣郎。網路社會學通訊期刊,18。  延伸查詢new window
3.Abel, M. H.、Flick, J.(2012)。Mediation and moderation in ratings of hostile jokes by men and womew。Humor,25(1),41-58。  new window
4.Bemiller, M. L.、Schneider, R. A.(2010)。It's not just a joke。Sociological Spectrum,30,459-479。  new window
5.Cornog, M.、Perper, T.(1999)。Make love, not war: The legacy of Gershon Legman, 1917-1999。The Journal of Sex Research,36(3),316-317。  new window
6.Greenwood, D.、Isbell, L. M.(2002)。Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: Men's and women's reactions to sexist jokes。Psychology of Women Quarterly,26,341-350。  new window
學位論文
1.蕭佳慧(2005)。笑話的書寫與閱讀--馮夢龍《笑府》、《古今笑》探論(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳克嫻(2003)。明清長篇世情小說中的笑話研究--以《金瓶梅》、《姑妄言》、《紅樓夢》為中心之考察(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.盧怡蓉(1997)。中國古代葷笑話研究:以笑話書為範疇(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王仁欲(1966)。開元天寶遺事。台北市:藝文。  延伸查詢new window
2.周安華(1993)。幽默與言語藝術。台北:商鼎文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃振家、宗靜萍、林妙容、吳蕙芬、張書翎、錢俊豪(2007)。大眾媒體研究導論。台北市:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.董季裳(1988)。修辭析論。台北市:益智書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.管梅芬(1993)。笑林廣記。台北市:文國書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Crooks, R.、Baur, K.(1999)。Our sexuality。Brooks, UK:Cole。  new window
7.Davis, M.(1983)。Erotic reality/ obscene ideology。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Freud, S.(1963)。Jokes and their relation to the unconscious。New York, NY:W. W. Norton & Co.。  new window
9.Fuchs, E.(1988)。Humor and sexism: The case of the Jewish joke。Jewish humor。New Brunswick, NY:Transaction Publishers。  new window
10.Grassi, Ernesto(1980)。Rhetoric as philosophy: The humanist tradition。University Park, PA:Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
11.Legman, G.(1968)。Rationale of the dirty joke: An analysis of sexual humor。New York, NY:Simon & Schuster Paperbacks。  new window
12.Sontag, S.(1991)。Style of radical will。New York, NY:Anchor Books。  new window
13.蔡宗陽(2001)。修辭學探微。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃慶萱(19920600)。修辭學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.周作人(1992)。周作人全集。臺北:藍燈文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.Van Dijk, Teun A.(1985)。Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol: 1--Disciplines of Discourse。London:Academic Press。  new window
17.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark、Chou, Shizhen(1980)。Metaphors We Live By。University of Chicago Press。  new window
18.Neuendorf, K. A.(2002)。The Content Analysis Guidebook。Sage。  new window
19.Krippendorff, Klaus H.(1980)。Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology。Sage。  new window
20.Popping, Roel(1988)。On Agreement Indices for Nominal Data。Sociometric Research: Data Collection and Scaling。New York, NY:St. Martins。  new window
其他
1.何春蕤(2003)。他們都會說--黃色笑話,http://sex.ncu.edu.tw/course/young/school/school4-3.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.林殷齊(2007)。從詮釋學視域試論台灣陽崇拜的歷史,http://203.71.53.60/xms/index.php?reload=l&view=content_list&courseID=46。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Lakoff, George(1993)。The contemporary theory of metaphor。Metaphor and thought。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top