目的：本研究主要最主要目的在了解，五年制醫護管理專科學校教師工作壓力、休閒阻礙因素的現況，並瞭解工作壓力、休閒阻礙與休閒參與之間的相關性為何。方法：本研究之研究對象為嘉義以南之7間五年制醫護管理專科學校教師總計發出500份正式問卷，回收282份，填答不全之無效問卷63份，共計有效問卷219份，有效回收率43.8%。以自編之問卷進行調查，回收之問卷資料以SPSS10.0統計軟體為輔助工具，所使用的分析方法為描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定（t-test）、單因子變異數分析（one-way ANOVA）、皮爾遜積差相關法（Pearson product-moment correlation）及逐步多元回歸分析法（stepwise regression）分別分析。結果與結論：一、在工作壓力方面，整體平均得分為2.45，工作壓力各構面分析則以「工作負荷」最高；另外，（一）、女性教師在「整體工作壓力」與「工作負荷」構面顯著高於男性，（二）、「教師兼導師兼行政」的教師在「工作負荷」顯著高於「教師兼導師」，（三）、「單獨居住」的教師「整體工作壓力」顯著高於「夫妻獨住」，「單獨居住」的教師「工作負荷」與「時間支配」兩構面的壓力皆顯著高於「夫妻獨住」、「單獨居住」的教師「時間支配」構面的壓力也顯著高於「與親人同住」；二、休閒阻礙方面，以整體平均得分為2.31，各構面則以「外在因素」得分最高。另外，男性教師在「參與同伴」構面顯著高於女性教師；三、教師工作壓力、休閒阻礙與休閒參與無顯著相關，且無法有效預測教師之休閒參與表現。

Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to understand the status of the southern Junior College teacher in work stress and leisure barriers, also discuse the correlation of leisure participation between the work stress and leisure barriers. Methods: the subjects of this study were the seven Junior College of Health Care and Management's teachers where south of Chiayi. We sent a total of 500 formal questionnaires, then 282 copies, and 63 incomplete ones were invalid. So, there were 219 valid questionnaires totally. The response rate was 43.8%. The questionnaire was designed by myself. After received the questionnaire data, the tool of software is SPSS10.0 statistical tools. Then, methods of analysis used descriptive statistics; independent sample t test (t-test), single factor analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA), Pearson product-moment correlation and stepwise regression analysis were analyzed. Result and Conclusion: The results were as follows: (a) The current status of stress score was 2.45. The dimension of job stress is ”work load” the highest. 1. Female teachers in the ”work stress” and ”work-loading” dimension significantly higher than male teachers; 2. ”A teacher, mentor and chief executive” of the teachers in the ”work-loading” dimension were significant higher than ”teacher and mentor” teachers; 3. The ”Single residence” teachers in ”overall work pressure” were significantly higher than ”husband and wife living alone” teachers. The ”living alone” teachers in ”work-loading” and ”disposable time” pressure were significantly higher than that of ”husband and wife living alone,” the teacher, ”live alone” teachers ”time dominance” dimension of the significant pressure higher than ”live with relatives,” the teacher; (b) The mean score in leisure constraints of Junior College teachers is 2.31. The dimensions of leisure constraints in order to ”external factors” the highest. In addition, the male teachers in the” participation companion ”dimension was significantly higher than female teachers; (c) Teachers' work stress, leisure barriers and leisure participation were not significant correlation, also can not effectively predict the teachers involved in the performance.