組織知曉力：科學社群的知識創生__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	組織知曉力：科學社群的知識創生
書刊名：	組織與管理
作者：	歐素華
作者(外文)：	Ou, Sue-hwa
出版日期：	2010
卷期：	3:2
頁次：	頁1-32
主題關鍵詞：	知識創生；跨域創新；組織知曉力；工作實務；科學社群；Knowledge creation；Cross-boundary innovation；Organizational knowing；Work practice；Scientific community
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:60

當代文獻對知識創生的討論，大多集中在知識的移轉與管理上，較少探討組織集體能力之養成。然而，隨著全球化與網際網路的興起，跨疆界的研發創新已不能僅由知識移轉的角度觀察，而必須從分散式組織管理、由實踐社群觀點進行討論。尤其，跨領域科學家的專業社群不但具有高度的知識含量，更經常能因應環境變化，產生突破性的創新成就，因此具有重要的研究價值。本研究調查台灣頂尖的科學社群─「無線奈米生醫團隊」，由這個科學社群特殊的組織知曉力(organizational knowing)分析成員的工作脈絡，以掌握社群如何持續有效地進行知識創造。本研究發現，知識創生不僅和社群的認同能力有關，更與社群的溝通、協調能力與專業知識的學習能力有關。此外，社群如何有效地動員自主研發的科學家，積極投入創新協作，亦有其特殊的組織實務。本研究總結組織知曉力乃是一種「識人之明」的能力、「識時務本」的能力，更是「適才適所」的能力。本研究探討實踐社群的知識創生對研發創新管理之啟示，並點出對管理科研團隊的實務意涵。

以文找文

Product or service innovation often requires highly specialized experts to work collectively, such as the design of computer server or performing a cardiovascular surgery. Current studies of knowledge creation focus more on the management of objectified knowledge. However, we know relatively little about how professional organizations, such as expert communities, may create knowledge effectively. This study examines a leading scientific community—the Wireless Health Advanced Monitoring Bio-Diagnosis System (WHAM-BioS). This team consists of leading scientists from different scientific domains, such as nanotechnology,bio-technology, information technology and network communications.This study analyzes the scientists’ knowing in action, which facilitates knowledge creation. This research interprets knowing in identity-sharing, cross-training, motivation-enhancing, learning-by-doing and effort-aligning. These practices explain how the scientific community is organized in a distinctive fashion for effective innovation. The research findings provide theoretical and practical insights to knowledge creation and community-of-practices.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Katz, M.L.、Shapiro, C.(1985)。Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility。The American Economic Review，75(3)，424-440。
2.	Hedlund, G.(1994)。A model of Knowledge Management and the N-Form Corporation。Strategic Management Journal，15，73-90。
3.	Nonaka, Ikujiro(1994)。A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation。Organization Science，5(1)，14-37。
4.	Lee, G. K.、Cole, R. E.(2003)。From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the linux kernel development。Organization Science，14(6)，633-649。
5.	Barley, S. R.(1996)。Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies。Administrative Science Quarterly，41(3)，410-444。
6.	Barrett, F. J.(1998)。Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: implications for organizational learning。Organization Science，9，605-622。
7.	Bekkers, R.、Duysters, G.、Verspagen, B.(2002)。Intellectual property rights, strategy technology agreements and market structure: The case of GSM。Research Policy，31(7)，1141-1161。
8.	Braam, R. R.、Moed, H. F.、van Raan, A. F. J.(1991)。Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis, I. structure aspects。Journal of American Society for Information Science，42(4)，231-251。
9.	Brown, J. S.、Duguid, P.(1998)。Organizing knowledge。California Management Review，40(3)，90-111。
10.	Cummings, Jonathon N.、Kiesler, Sara(2005)。Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries。Social Studies of Science，35(4)，703-722。
11.	Duque, R. B.、Ynalvez, M.、Sooryamoothy, R.、Mbatia, P.(2005)。Collaboration paradox: Scientific productivity, the internet, and problems of research in development areas。Social Studies of Science，35(4)，755-785。
12.	Langley, A.(1999)。Strategies for theorizing from process data。Academy of Management Review，24(4)，691-710。
13.	Leonard-Barton, D.(1992)。Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development。Strategic Management Journal，13，111-125。
14.	McEvily, B.、Perrone, V.、Zaheer, A.(2003)。Trust as an organizing principle。Organization Science，14(1)，91-103。
15.	Orlikowski, W. J.(2002)。Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing。Organization Science，13，249-273。
16.	Ouchi, William G.(1980)。Markets, bureaucracies, and clans。Administrative Science Quarterly，25(1)，129-141。
17.	Schultze, U.、Orlikowski, W. J.(2004)。A practice perspective on technologymediated network relations: The use of internet-based self-service technologies。Information Systems Research，15(1)，87-106。
18.	Teece, D. J.(1996)。Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation。Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization，31(2)，193-224。
19.	Tsoukas H.(1996)。The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach。Strategic Management Journal: Knowledge of the Firm，17(Special Issue)，11-25。
20.	Weick, K. E.(1993)。The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The mann gulch disaster。Administrative Science Quarterly，38，628-652。
21.	Brown, John Seely、Duguid, Paul(2001)。Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective。Organization Science，12(2)，198-213。
22.	Weick, Karl E.、Roberts, Karlene H.(1993)。Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks。Administrative Science Quarterly，38(3)，357-381。

研究報告
1.	行政院科技顧問組(2009)。行政院產業人力套案「加值產學（研）合作連結創新」。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Nonaka, I.、Takeuchi, H.(1995)。The knowledge-creating company。N.Y.：Oxford University Press。
2.	Nelson, Richard R.、Winter, Sidney G.(1982)。An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
3.	Giddens, Anthony(1984)。The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration。Cambridge：Polity Press。
4.	Bourdieu, P.、Nice, R.(1977)。Outline of a theory of practice。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
5.	Miller, W. L.、Morris, L.(1999)。Forth generation RandD。New York：John Wiley and Sons。
6.	Mowery, D. C.(1996)。The international computer software industry: A comparative study of industry evolution and structure。New York：Oxford University Press。
7.	Schatzki, T. R. K.、Cetina, K.、von Savigny, E.(2001)。The practice turn in contemporary theory。London, UK：Routledge。
8.	Schon, D. A.(1984)。The reflective practitioner。New York：Basic Books。
9.	Wenger, E.(1998)。Communities at practice: Learning, meaning, and identity。England：Cambridge University Press。
10.	Polanyi, Michael(1967)。The Tacit Dimension。New York：M. E. Sharp Inc.。
11.	Drucker, P. F.(1993)。Post-Capitalist Society。Butterworth Heinemann。
12.	Latour, Bruno(1987)。Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society。Harvard University Press。
13.	Orr, J. E.(1996)。Talking about Machines: an Ethnography of a Modern Job。Ithaca, N. Y.：ILR Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

無相關期刊論文

1.	創新作為：科研團隊的組織作為與知識創生

1.	創新作為：科研團隊的組織作為與知識創生
2.	創新作為：科研團隊的組織作為與知識創生

無相關著作

1.	社交網絡的學習：實踐星群觀點
2.	Money Plucked from the Sky: Shrimp Farming, Entrepreneurship and the Circulation of Know-How in a Fujian Village

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫