:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社交網絡的學習:實踐星群觀點
書刊名:資訊社會研究
作者:陳斐卿 引用關係王慶中
作者(外文):Chen, Fei-chingWang, Ching-chung
出版日期:2011
卷期:19
頁次:頁1-31
主題關鍵詞:實踐星群仲介者跨界學習網路合作學習Constellations of practiceBrokeringCross boundaryComputer supported collaborative learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:19
本文探索網路不同小組成員之間跨界(boundary crossing)的活動,跨界環境裡的人際網絡會不會湧現什麼新的學習機會?本研究資料來自於網路討論區紀錄與訪談。三百多位高中生分成56個小組,線上合作長達六週,成員在「小組討論區」發展出自己的運作,使得小組學習同時也是在經營實踐社群(communities of practice, COP)活動;不同小組跨界交談也有一個「跨組討論區」,形成一個壯闊的實踐星群(constellations of practice)景觀。本研究挑戰一般人對合作學習僅發生於組內的預設,揭露各實踐社群成員的跨界行為帶來豐沛的學習,人際網絡提供學習活動有效的支持。其中,跨界成員互動層次不一,分為活躍者、投入者、與周邊者三種類型的仲介者,各有不同興趣能力,展現不同風貌,共同創造出一種集體的仲介實踐(collective brokering practice)。
This study analyzes boundary-crossing participants’ activities in a virtual environment. Research on collaborative learning quite often focuses on interaction within a group and pays little attention to interaction among groups, which has conventionally been considered as irrelevant to learning. Is there any learning occurred when learners cross boundaries? Data were mainly collected from postings and interviews of a six-week inquiry-based scientific activity. 353 voluntary high school students were assigned to 56 groups with 6 members in each group. Two kinds of forums were available. One was designed for discussion of 6 group members only, Within-Group Forums (WGFs). The other was designed for cross-group discussion, the Cross-Group Forum (CGF). One-third of participants went out to CGF and sought new sociation to satisfy their needs. Although they belonged to different COPs, they related to each other at the level of constellations of practice. It was this practice that motivated them to be interconnected with each other. Three levels of boundary spanning behaviors were identified. Brokers did not function merely as buffers or negotiators between people from many COPs. Instead, peripheral and intensive brokers contributed their diverse perspectives and problems generated in different COPs; proactive brokers maintained a collegial and dialogical atmosphere by responding to every posting in a timely fashion. As a group, they provided a participative connection from which they collectively accomplished the enterprise of brokering. The newly phenomenon of collective brokering practice in virtual environment is discussed in detail.
期刊論文
1.Gherardi, S.、Nicolini, D.(2002)。Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: canon or dissonance?。Journal of Management Studies,39(4),419-436。  new window
2.Barcellini, F.、Detienne, F.、Burkhardt, J.M.(2008)。Users and developers mediation in an Open Source Software Community: boundary spanning through cross participation in online discussions。International Journal of Human Computer Studies,66(7),558-570。  new window
3.Cobb, P.、McClain, K.(2006)。The collective mediation of a high stakes accountability program: Communities and networks of practice。Mind, Culture, and Activity,13,80-100。  new window
4.Chen, F.C.、Wang, C. T.(2009)。Social conversation and effective discussion in online group learning。Educational Technology Research and Development 57(5),57(5),587-612。  new window
5.Wolf, R. E.(1956)。Aspects of Group Relations in a Complex Society: Mexico。American Anthropologist,58(6),1065-1078。  new window
6.Corbin, B、McNamara, O.、Williams, J.(2003)。Numeracy coordinators: 'Brokering change within and between communities of practice?'。British Journal of Educational Studies,51(4),344-368。  new window
7.Davis, M.(1971)。That’s interesting! Toward a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology。Philosophy of Social Science,1,309-344。  new window
8.Engestrom, Y.(2007)。Enriching the Theory of Expansive Learning: Lessons From Journeys Toward Co configuration。Mind, Culture, and Activiry,14(1),23-39。  new window
9.Friedrichsen, P. M、Munford, D.、Orgill, M.(2006)。Brokering at the boundary: A prospective science teacher engages students in inquiry。Science Teacher Education,90,522-543。  new window
10.Kostogriz, A.(2006)。Putting Space on the Agenda of Socio-cultural Research。Mind, Culture, and Activity,13(3),176-190。  new window
11.Levina, N.、Vaast, E.(2006)。Turning a community into a market: A practice perspective on information technology use in boundary spanning。Journal of Management Information Systems,22(4),13-37。  new window
12.Walker, D.、Nocon, H.(2007)。Boundary-crossing competence: Theoretical considerations and educational design。Mind, Culture, and Activity,(14)3,178- 195。  new window
研究報告
1.Kuhiak, C.(2003)。A Community of Practice perspective on school-based learning communities。  new window
學位論文
1.李郁薇(2005)。網路學習社群中的潛水現象:一種被忽略的充分參與(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wenger, E.(1998)。Communities at practice: Learning, meaning, and identity。England:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Jones, C.、Esnault, L.(2004)。The metaphor of networks in learning: Communities, collaboration and practice。Proceedings of the fourth international conference on networked learning。Lancaster。  new window
3.Dennen, V. & Paulus, T.M.(2005)。Researching collaborative knowledge building in formal distance learning environments。Proceedings of the nternational Conference on Computer-supported Collaborative Learning 2005。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE