:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:羽球校隊凝聚力與教練領導行為之研究
書刊名:中原體育學報
作者:陳盛彬 引用關係萬捷雄 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Sheng-pinWan, Chien-hsiung
出版日期:2013
卷期:2
頁次:頁149-163
主題關鍵詞:教練領導行為團隊凝聚力成績表現Coaches' leadership behaviorTeam cohesionAchievement performance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
本研究主要目的是在瞭解高中以上羽球選手對球隊凝聚力與教練領導行為之情形,並採用問卷調查方式,以參加101年第一次全國羽球排名賽羽球選手為研究對象。並將所得資料經描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、雪費法事後比較法分析。其檢定結果:一、女性選手知覺教練領導行為高於男性且達到顯著差異水準(p<.05),不同性別的選手在知覺團隊凝聚力皆未達到顯著差異水準(p<.05)。二、不同訓練年數在教練領導行為中的訓練與指導、關懷、獎勵、民主、協議等五項因素構面,皆未達到顯著差異。訓練年數六年以上之選手在團隊凝聚力中的人際親和、團隊合作、團隊適應、人際吸引等四項因素構面,皆顯著高於其他人。三、不同參賽組別之選手,在知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力上呈現顯著差異,大專組的選手對於知覺教練的領導行為與團隊凝聚力顯著高於其他選手;而在領導行為與團隊凝聚力的各構面無顯著差異。四、不同運動成績表現的選手在教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力皆未達顯著水準。五、不同每週練習天數選手在知覺教練領導行為為與團隊凝聚力皆未達顯著差異水準(p<.05)。
The purpose of this study was to examine the team cohesion and coaches' leadership behavior on badminton players above high school levels using Data were collected through the use of a self-designed demographic information questionnaire. The research subjects of this study were players who participated in the first national ranking badminton tournament in 2012. The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, One-way ANOVA and Scheffe's method. Major research findings are as the following: 1. There were significant differences (p<.05) on perception of coaches' leadership behaviors in female players than male players, but no significant differences in genders on perception of team cohesion. 2. In coaches' leadership behavior: there were no significant differences in different years of training on five dimensions: training and instruction, caring, positive feedback, democratic behavior and negotiating behavior. In team cohesion: there were much more aware of players train for more than 6 years on four dimensions: well-rounded interpersonal skills, team work, team adaptation and interpersonal attraction. 3. There were significant differences in perception of coaches' leadership behavior and team cohesion on players participating in different categories. There were much more aware of college players than other players in perception of coaches' leadership behavior and team cohesion but no significant differences on the dimensions of coaches' leadership behavior and team cohesion 4. There were no significant differences in perception of coaches' leadership behavior and team cohesion on players with different sport achievement performance. 5. There were no significant differences (p<.05) in perception of coaches' leadership behavior and team cohesion on player's days of practice per week.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE