:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國際青少年男子網球選手影響比賽勝負之攻守技術分析
書刊名:運動教練科學
作者:簡瑞宇 引用關係
作者(外文):Chien, Jui-yu
出版日期:2013
卷期:31
頁次:頁13-28
主題關鍵詞:青少年網球選手攻守技術因子贏球率Junior tennis playerThe offence and defense technique factorsThe percentage of points won
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:90
  • 點閱點閱:70
目的:探討國際青少年男子選手在網球四大公開賽之各攻守技術因子對比賽勝負的影響,並分析勝方選手在四大公開賽各項技術因子的比較。方法:本研究對象為晉級2012年網球四大公開賽青少年組男單16強選手共41名。統計方法採用獨立樣本t檢定及單因子變異數分析,顯著水準設定為α = .05。結果:一、在2012澳網中,ACE球數、第二發球贏球率及致勝球等因子,獲勝選手比落敗選手表現較佳(2顆,15.5%,5.8個;p < .05);在2012法網中,雙發失誤、非受迫性失誤及接發球點勝率等因子,獲勝選手比落敗選手表現較佳(-1.3個,-3.2次,13.2%;p < .05);在2012溫網中,第二發球贏球率因子,獲勝選手比落敗選手表現較佳(15.3%;p < .05);在2012美網中,第一發進球率、ACE球數、第二發球贏球率及致勝球等因子,獲勝選手比落敗選手表現較佳(12.5%,1.7顆,16.8%,5.8個;p < .05)。二、獲勝選手之三種技術因子在四大公開賽有差異,在非受迫性失誤每場次數依序為溫網、法網及澳網;在致勝球在每場表現依序為溫網、美網及澳網;而在第二發球贏球率(%)的表現依序為溫網、美網、法網及澳網。結論:經分析四大公開賽之各攻守技術因子對比賽勝負的影響發現,青少年選手在(美、澳網)硬地及(溫網)草地球場比賽時,在第二發球的發揮成為獲勝的關鍵,而在(法網)紅土球場雙發失誤及非受迫性失誤明顯影響比賽勝負,因此,減少發球失誤與提升擊球的穩定性是贏球的重點。
Purpose: The study was to examine the effects of the offence and defense technique factors on Four Tennis Opens outcomes among international junior male tennis players, and analyze the winners on each technique factors in Four Tennis Opens. Methods: Forty-one junior male's singles top16 tennis players ranking in 2012 Four Tennis Opens, including France Open, Wimbledon Championship, US Open and Australian Open, were subjects in this study. The study adopted Independent t test and one-way ANOVA as the statistical method. The remarkable standard established (α = .05). Result: First, Australian Open, the factors were Aces, the percentage of second-serve points won and winners. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (2, 15.5%, 5.8; p < .05); France Open, the factors were double faults, unforced errors and total return points won. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (-1.3, -3.2, 13.2%; p < .05); Wimbledon Championship, the factor is the percentage of second-serve points won. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (15.3%; p < .05); US Open, the factors were the percentage of first-serve points won, Aces, the percentage of second-serve points won and winners. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (12.5%, 1.7, 16.8%, 5.8; p < .05). Second, the winners' three technique factors in Four Tennis Opens have differences. The unforced errors per game are in the order as Wimbledon Championship, France Open, and Australian Open. The performances of winners in each game are in the order as Wimbledon Championship, US Open, and Australian Open. The performances of the second serve winning percentage are in the order as Wimbledon Championship, US Open, France Open, and Australian Open. Conclusion: Though the analysis of the effect of the offence and defense technique factors on Four Tennis Opens outcomes, the study discovered that the development of the second-serve was the key to victory when junior tennis players match in hard court (US Open, Australian Open) and grass court (Wimbledon Championship). Double faults and unforced errors in clay court (France Open) obviously affected the success and the failure of the competition. In conclusion, to reduce the serve errors and to promote the stability of serve were the key to win.
期刊論文
1.連玉輝(2009)。全方位強式網球(Complete Power Tennis)模式之補強。運動教練科學,13,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉佳哲、張碧峰(20111200)。優秀女子職業網球選手影響比賽勝負之技術因子分析。運動教練科學,24,25-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉錦璋、張凱隆(20120600)。網球發球優勢的意義與應用。屏東教大體育,15,221-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳忠芳、李建平、郭世傑(20060600)。網球單打比賽的生理學分析。運動生理暨體能學報,4,21-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Washington, M.、長昇文化(2001)。強勁的後座力。國際網球雜誌,44,58-59。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉中興、羅宏仁(19990600)。1997年美國網球公開賽各項戰況變數與比賽勝負之比較研究。大專體育,43,113-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Austin, T.(2000)。打好回發球回報多多。國際網球雜誌,43,36-38。  延伸查詢new window
8.Isaacs, L. D.、Finch, A. E(1983)。Anticipatory Timing of Beginning and Intermediate Tennis Players。Perceptual and Motor Skills,57(2),451-454。  new window
9.陳智仁(19970900)。網球場地表面性質對選手擊球得分技術之差異研究。南亞學報,17,141-165。  延伸查詢new window
10.邱豐傑(20100300)。網球公開賽男子單打之技術型態。大專體育學刊,12(1),83-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.李建平(20040300)。國內優秀男子網球選手單打發球對比賽勝負關係之研究。體育學報,36,227-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.張碧峰、陳志榮(20091200)。不同場地對男子職業網球選手發球與接發球技術之影響。體育學報,42(4),29-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃僅喻(2011)。職業網球選手Djokovic與Federer對戰各階段得分之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Morris, K.(1998)。An analysis of the status of professional tennis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation(-)。Boston University。  new window
3.張凱隆(2008)。頂尖職業選手發球優勢探討--以2007年四大公開賽男女單打比賽為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝侑達(2011)。從納達爾與費德勒對戰比賽中探討頂尖網球選手的得分優勢(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.翁梓林(1993)。網球在紅土球場與硬地球場表面碰撞之比較(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉中興(1996)。網球發球贏球率與比賽勝負關係之比較研究(碩士論文)。文化大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Overton, W.(1973)。Tennis for women。New York:Doubleday。  new window
2.李鑑芸(2007)。ATP男子網球技術分析。臺北縣:啟業。  延伸查詢new window
3.張清泉(1988)。網球發球理論與技術研究。台北:體育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.萬欣(20110201)。網壇力量化新生代難出頭,http://mag.udn.com/ mag/sports/printpage.jsp?f_ART_ID=300053。  延伸查詢new window
2.ATP.(2012)。ATP Titles/Finals. Retrieved December,http://www.atpworldtour.com, 20121225。  new window
3.Federation Frangaise de Tennis(2012)。Boys singles draw.,http://www.fft.fr/roland.garros/default_en.asp, 20120626。  new window
4.Tennis Australia.(2012)。Junior boys singles draw.,http://www.australianopen.com, 20120220。  new window
5.United States Tennis Association(2012)。Junior boys singles draw.,http://www.usopen.org, 20120918。  new window
6.Wimbledon.(2012)。Boys singles draw.,http://www. wimbledon.org, 20120808。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE