臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國際關係歷史社會學理論的發展與評析
書刊名：問題與研究
作者：郭雪真
作者(外文)：Kuo, Hsueh Chen
出版日期：2013
卷期：52:3
頁次：頁63-96
主題關鍵詞：國際關係理論；國際關係歷史社會學；國際關係中的歷史社會學；歷史社會學；非歷史主義；International relations theory；International historical sociology；Historical sociology in international relations；Historical sociology；Ahistoricism
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:35
本文主旨在研究國際關係歷史社會學的興起與發展，反思其理論觀點，以及呈現此理論的優勢與未來，促使國內國際關係學者能關注此理論（或研究途徑）。因此，本文第壹部分說明國際關係歷史社會學的流行風潮，以顯現其近年所受到國際關係學者的重視，並約略說明國內相對的情形，以提醒國內國際關係學者關注此理論（或研究途徑）。第貳部分探討國際關係歷史社會學的理論（或研究途徑）發展過程，說明其經過三波的發展階段所關注的重點，尤其是批判主流理論的非歷史性或非歷史主義（ahistoricism）。第參部分探討國際關係歷史社會學轉向全球歷史社會學，主要是由於國際關係的全球性而引發其爭論全球的歷史社會性。第肆部分反思國際關係歷史社會學的若干關鍵議題，以思考其可能的發展趨勢。第伍部分探討國際關係歷史社會學的理論優勢與未來方向，藉以呈現其成為國際關係理論的新展望。
As a reminder for the domestic scholars in International Relations to acquaint to the International Historical Sociology (HIS), this paper aims at researching the development, reflections and prospects of IHS, while analyzing its strengths and future orientations. This paper presents a five-part analysis to reach these aims. The first part describes the popularity of IHS. Though more scholars have paid attentions to it in recent years, the trends in Taiwan have been opposite. This paper drafts a short review and call for International Relations scholars in Taiwan to acknowledge the trend. The second part of this paper examines the development of IHS in order to illustrate the foci of its three-wave development-in particular, the critique of ahistoricism in mainstream International Relations Theory. The third part discusses the shift of IHS toward Global Historical Sociology, which has been a result of debates between historical-social dimensions of globality in International Relations. The fourth part reflects some key issues of IHS and consider its trend of development. The fifth part explores the strengths and future orientations of IHS and assesses its prospects.
期刊論文
1.Bohman, James(2009)。What is to be done? The Science Question in International Relations。International Theory，1(3)，488-498。  new window
2.Allinson, Jamie C.、Anievas, Alexander(2009)。The Uses and Misuses of Uneven and Combined Development: An Anatomy of a Concept。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，22(1)，47-67。  new window
3.Anievas, Alexander(2009)。Debating Uneven and Combined Development: Toward a Marxist Theory of 'the International'?。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，22(1)，7-8。  new window
4.Ashman, Sam(2009)。Capitalism, Uneven and Combined Development and the Transhistoric。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，22(1)，29-46。  new window
5.Bhambra, Gurminder K.(2010)。Historical Sociology, International Relations and Connected Histories。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，23(1)，127-143。  new window
6.Bhambra, Gurminder K.(2011)。Talking among Themselves? Weberian and Marxist Historical Sociologies as Dialogues without 'Others'。Millennium: Journal of International Studies，39(3)，667-681。  new window
7.Buzan, Barry(2001)。The English School : An Unexplored Resources in IR。Review of International Studies，27(3)，471-488。  new window
8.Callinicos, Alex、Rosenberg, Justin(2008)。Uneven and Combined Development: the Social-Relational Substratum of 'the International'?。A Exchange of Letters, Cambridge Review of International Affairs，21(1)，77-112。  new window
9.Callinicos, Alex(2005)。Epoch and Conjuncture in Marxist Political Economy。International Politics，42(2)，355-362。  new window
10.Callinicos, Alex(2009)。How to Solve the Many-State Problem: A Reply to the Debate。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，22(1)，89-105。  new window
11.Dannreuther, Roland、Kennedy, James(2007)。Historical Sociology in Sociology: British Decline and US Hegemony with Lessons for International Relations。International Politics，44(4)，369-389。  new window
12.Davidson, Nail(2009)。Putting the Nation Back into the 'International'。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，22(1)，9-28。  new window
13.de Carvalho, Benjamin、Leira, Halvard、Hobson, John M.(2011)。The Big Bangs of IR: The Myth That Your Teachers Still Tell about 1648 and 1919。Millennium，39(3)，735-758。  new window
14.Dufour, Frederick Guillaume(2007)。Social-Property Regimes and the Uneven and Combined Development of Nationalist Practice。European Journal of International Relations，13(4)，583-604。  new window
15.Dunne, Tim(1998)。International Relations Theory and the Mirror of History。Review Article, European Journal of International Politics，4(3)，47。  new window
16.Gamble, Andrew(2005)。Globalization: Getting The 'Big Picture' Right, A Comment on Justin Rosenberg。International Politics，42(2)，364-371。  new window
17.Glenn, John(2012)。Uneven and Combined Development: A Fusion of Marxism and Structural Realism。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，25(19)，75-95。  new window
18.Hall, Martin(1999)。Review Essay: International Relations and Historical Sociology: Taking Stock of Convergence。Review of International Political Economy，6(1)，101-109。  new window
19.Halliday, Fred(2005)。He Hasn't Finished Yet: Achievements and Challenges in the Work of Michael Mann。Millennium，34(2)，509-516。  new window
20.Halperin, Sandra(1998)。Shadowboxing: Weberian Historical Sociology vs. State-Centric International Relations Theory。Review of International Political Economy，5(2)，327-339。  new window
21.Hobden, Stephen(2000)。Theorising the International System: Perspectives from Historical Sociology。Review of International Studies，25(2)，251-271。  new window
22.Hobden, Stephen(2001)。You Can Choose Your Sociology But You Can't Choose Your Relations: Tilly, Mann and Relational Sociology。Review of International Studies，27(2)，281-286。  new window
23.Hobson, John M.(1998)。The Historical Sociology of the State and the State of Historical Sociology in International Relations。Review of International Political Economy，5(2)，284-320。  new window
24.Hobson, John M.(1998)。For a 'Second- Wave' Weberian Historical Sociology in International Relations: A Reply to Halperin and Shaw。Review of International Political Economy，5(2)，354-361。  new window
25.Hobson, John M.(2011)。What's State in the Neo-Troskyist Debate? Toward a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development。Millennium，40(1)，147-166。  new window
26.Hobson, John M.、Lawson, George(2007)。What Is History in International Relations。Millennium，37(2)，415-435。  new window
27.Kessler, Oliver(2012)。World Society, Social Differentiation and Time。International Political Sociology，6(1)，77-94。  new window
28.Kurki, Milja(2009)。The Politics of the Philosophy of Science。International Theory，1(3)，440-454。  new window
29.Lapointe, Thierry、Dufour, Frederick Guillaume(2012)。Assessing the Historical Turn in IR: An Anatomy of Second Wave Historical Sociology。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，25(1)，97-121。  new window
30.Lawson, George(2005)。A Conversation with Michael Mann。Millennium，34(2)，477-485。  new window
31.Lawson, George(2005)。The Social Source of Life, the Universe and Everything: A Conversation with Michael Mann。Millennium，34(2)，487-508。  new window
32.Lawson, George(2007)。Editors Introduction: Forum on Historical Sociology。International Politics，44(4)，341-342。  new window
33.Lawson, George(2007)。Historical Sociology in International Relations: Open Society, Research Programme and Vocation。International Politics，44(4)，343-368。  new window
34.Lawson, George(2006)。The Promise of Historical Sociology in International Relations。International Studies Review，8(3)，415-416。  new window
35.Lawson, George、Shilliam, Robbie(2010)。Sociology and International Relations: Legacy and Prospects。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，23(1)，69-86。  new window
36.Lawson, George(2010)。The Eternal Divide? History and International Relations。European Journal of International Relations，18(2)，203-226。  new window
37.Linklater, Andrew(2004)。Norbert Elias, The 'Civilizing Process' and the Sociology of International Relations。International Politics，41(1)，3-35。  new window
38.Mabee, Bryan(2007)。Levels and Agents, States and People: Micro-Historical Sociological Analysis and International Relations。International Politics，44(4)，431-449。  new window
39.Mann, Michael(2005)。Explaining International Relations, Empires and European Miracles: A Response。Millennium，34(2)，541-550。  new window
40.Matin, Kamran(2007)。Uneven and Combined Development in World History: The International Relations of State-Formation in Premodern Iran。European Journal of International Relations，13(3)，419-447。  new window
41.Moisi, Dominique(2007)。The Clash of Emotions。Foreign Affairs，86(1)，8-12。  new window
42.Nexon, Daniel(2001)。Which Historical Sociology? A Response to Stephen Hobden's 'Theorising the International System'。Review of International Studies，27(2)，273-280。  new window
43.Rioux, Sebastien(2009)。International Historical Sociology: Recovering Sociohistorical Causality。Rethinking Marxism，21(4)，585-604。  new window
44.Rosenberg, Justin(2005)。Globalization Theory: A Post-Mortem。International Politics，42(1)，2-74。  new window
45.Rosenberg, Justin(2006)。Why is There No International Historical Sociology?。European Journal of International Relations，12(3)，307-340。  new window
46.Rosenberg, Justin(2007)。International Relations-The 'Higher Bullshit': A Reply to the Globalization Theory Debate。International Politics，44(4)，450-482。  new window
47.Rosenberg, Justin(2009)。Basic Problems in the Theory of Uneven and Combined Development: A Reply to the CRIA Forum。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，22(1)，107-110。  new window
48.Rosenberg, Justin(2010)。Basic Problems in the Theory of Uneven and Combined Development. Part II: Unevenness and Political Multiplicity。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，23(1)，165-189。  new window
49.Shaw, Martin(1997)。The State of Globalization: Toward to a Theory of State Transformation。Review of International Political Economy，4(3)，497-513。  new window
50.Shaw, Martin(1998)。The Historical Sociology of the Future。Review of International Political Economy，5(2)，321-326。  new window
51.Shaw, Martin(2001)。The Historical Transitions of Our Times: The Question of Globality in Historical Sociology。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，14(2)，273-289。  new window
52.Shilliam, Robbie(2009)。The Atlantic as a Vector of Uneven and Combined Development。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，22(1)，69-88。  new window
53.Spohn, Willfried(2011)。An Appraisal of Shmuel Noah Eisenstadfs Global Historical Sociology。The Journal of Classical Sociology，11(3)，281-301。  new window
54.Teschke, Benno(2011)。Advances and Impasses in Fred Halliday's International Historical Sociology: A Critical Appraisal。International Affairs，87(5)，1087-1106。  new window
55.Weiss, Linda(2005)。Michael Mann, State Power, and the Two Logics of Globalisation。Millennium: Journal of International Studies，34(2)，529-539。  new window
56.Buzan, Barry(1993)。From International System to International Society: Structure Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School。International Organization，47(3)，327-352。  new window
57.Hobson, John M.、Sharman, J. C.(2005)。The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change。European Journal of International Relations，11(1)，63-98。  new window
58.Hobson, John M.(2007)。Reconstructing International Relations Through World History: Oriental Globalization and the Global-Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civilizational Relations。International Politics，44(4)，414-430。  new window
59.Spruyt, Hendrik(1998)。Historical Sociology and Systems Theory in International Relations。Review of International Political Economy，5(2)，340-353。  new window
60.Hobson, John M.(2005)。Eurocentrism and Neorealism in the 'Fall of Mann': Will the Real Mann Please Stand Up?。Millennium，34(2)，517-527。  new window
61.Cox, Robert W.(1981)。Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory。Millennium: Journal of International Studies，10(2)，126-155。  new window
62.余家哲、李政鴻(20090600)。歷史社會學與國際關係理論的交會：歷史社會學的國家理論。政治科學論叢，40，127-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
63.Schroeder, Paul W.(1997)。History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit。International Security，22(1)，64-74。  new window
會議論文
1.Glencross, Andrew(2010)。Historical Consciousness in International Relations: A Hidden Disciplinary Dialogue。Paper Prepared for Millennium Conference，(會議日期: 16-17 October, 2010)。  new window
2.Martin, Hall(2007)。Historical Sociology Should not be a Subfield of IR。The Sixth Pan European Conference on International Relations in Turin，(會議日期: 12-15 September 2007)。  new window
研究報告
1.林炫向。爲一種制度多元論的世界秩序辯護 (計畫編號：NSC98-2410-H-431-007)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Adams, Julia(2005)。Remaking Modernity: Politics, History and Sociology。Durham, NC：Duke University Press。  new window
2.Griffiths, Martin、Roach, Steven C.、Solomon, M. Scott(2009)。Fifty Key Thinkers in International Relations。Routledge。  new window
3.Kaufman, Stuart J.、Little, Richard、Wohlforth, William C.(2007)。The Balance of Power in World History。New York：Palgrave MacMillan。  new window
4.Linklater, Andrew(2011)。The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigation。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Moisi, Dominique(2009)。The Geopolitics of Emotion: How the Cultures of Fear, Humiliation, and Hope Are Reshaping the World。New York：Anchor Books。  new window
6.Rosenberg, Justin(1994)。The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations。Verso。  new window
7.Rosenberg, Justin(2000)。The Follies of Globalisation Theory: Polemical Essays。Verso。  new window
8.Shaw, Martin(2000)。Theory of Global State: An Unfinished Revolution。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Hobden, Stephen.(1998)。International Relations and Historical Sociology:Breaking down Boundaries。New York：London：Routledge：Routledge。  new window
10.Hobson, John M.(2004)。The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation。Cambridge。  new window
11.Buzan, Barry G.(2004)。From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Hobden, Stephen、Hobson, John M.(2002)。Historical Sociology of International Relations。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Waltz, Kenneth Neal(2008)。Realism and International Politics。Routledge。  new window
14.張華葆(1993)。歷史社會學。臺北：三民。  延伸查詢new window
15.Buzan, Barry、Little, Richard(2000)。International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations。Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Hobson, John M.(2000)。The State and International Relations。Cambridge University Press。  new window
17.文崇一(1995)。歷史社會學：從歷史中尋找模式。台北：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.Huntington, Samuel Phillips(1996)。The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order。Simon & Schuster Company, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.New York Timesy(20011020)。Q and A, A Head on Collision of Alien Cultures?，http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/20/arts/20QNA.html7pagewanted=all， 2012/05/22。  new window
2.Said, Edward W.(20011004)。The Clash of Ignorance，http://www.thenation.com/article/clash-ignorance， 2012/05/ 28。  new window
圖書論文
1.Halliday, Fred(1996)。The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes。International Theory: Positivism and Beyond。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Kurki, Milja、Wight, Colin(2010)。International Relations and Social Science。International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Smith, Steve(2002)。Historical Sociology and International Relations Theory。Historical Sociology of International Relations。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.汪宏倫(2011)。歷史社會學。國際關係理論。臺北：五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
5.Darby, Phillip(1997)。Postcolonialism。At the Edge of International Relations: Postcolonialism, Gender, and Dependency。New York：Continuum。  new window
6.Grovogui, Siba(2007)。Postcolonialism。International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Hobden, Stephen。Historical Sociology: Back to the Future of International Relations?。Historical Sociology of International Relations。  new window
8.Hobson, John M.、Hobden, Stephen。On the Road Toward an Historicised World Sociology。Historical Sociology of International Relations。  new window
9.Hobson, John M.。The Two Waves of Historical Sociology。Historical Sociology of International Relations。  new window
10.Hobson, John M.。What's at Stake in 'Bring Historical Sociology Back into International Relations'? Transcending 'Chronofetishism' and 'tempocentrism' in International Relations。Historical Sociology of International Relations。  new window
11.Hobson, John M.(2010)。George Lawson, and Justin Rosenberg, "Historical Sociology"。The International Studies Encyclopedia。New York：Wiley-Blackwell。  new window
12.Linklater, Andrew(2009)。Historical Sociology。Theories of International Relations。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
13.Schmidt, Brian C.(2002)。On the History and Historiography of International Relations。Handbook of International Relations。London：Sage。  new window
14.林炫向(2011)。國際關係的規範論述。國際關係總論。新北市：揚智出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：421（臺灣：415，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2196945 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68007054
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上