:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:考量競爭行為下航空公司班表規劃之研究
書刊名:運輸學刊
作者:湯慶輝 引用關係管炳學
作者(外文):Tang, Ching-huiKuan, Ping-hsueh
出版日期:2014
卷期:26:2
頁次:頁173-202
主題關鍵詞:班表變動需求競爭賽局理論網路流動技巧TimetableVariable demandsCompetitionGame theoryNetwork flow techniques
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:35
在寡占競爭的市場中,各家航空公司為搶得相對優勢,在進行班表規劃時須同時考量對方的規劃策略,以能準確預測旅客的需求,並選擇對自己最有利的規劃方式。因此,本研究以利潤最大化為目標,構建一航空公司航班規劃架構,此架構包含一旅客選擇行為模式、賽局技巧與一班表規劃模式。為測試本研究架構的績效,本研究以一國內航空公司的營運資料為例,進行範例測試與分析,結果顯示,本研究航班規劃架構求解時間僅需551秒,執行效率良好,而透過本研究航班規劃架構,可增加航空公司利潤,在所測試航線中最高航線可增加9.84%,結果甚佳。
An airline wants to obtain its relative advantage because of the competition in an oligopoly and competitive market. Hence, when an airline plansitstimetable, it also needs to consider the competitors' timetable strategies in order to accurately forecast passenger demands and further chooses the best timetable strategy. Therefore, we develop a timetable planning framework with the objective of maximizing the carrier profit. The framework includes a passenger choice model, the game theory, and a timetable setting model. To understand the performance of our framework, we use the data from a Taiwan airline's operations to perform a numerical test. The results show that the solution time of our framework is only 551 seconds, indicating the good solution effectiveness. In addition, the profit of the airline can be increased by using our framework. The most profit is increased 9.84% in all flight routes tested in this study, showing the good performance of the proposed framework.
期刊論文
1.Yan, Shangyao、Young, Hwei-Fwa(1996)。A Decision Support Framework for Multi-Fleet Routing and Multi-Stop Flight Scheduling。Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice,30(5),379-398。  new window
2.王彥蓁、陸積偉(20080300)。我國國內線航空公司競合賽局之研究。醒吾學報,37,57-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.顏上堯、曾志煌(19991200)。單機種機隊排程與班次整合之研究。運輸計劃,28(4),635-657。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Abara, J.(1989)。Applying Integer Linear Programming to the Fleet Assignment problem。Interfaces,19(4),20-28。  new window
5.Aguirregabiria, V.、Ho, C. Y.(2011)。A Dynamic Oligopoly Game of the US Airline Industry: Estimation and Policy Experiments。Journal of Econometrics,168(1),156-173。  new window
6.Desaulniers, G.、Desrosiers, J.、Dumas, Y.、Solomon, M. M.、Soumis, F.(1997)。Daily Aircraft Routing and Scheduling。Management Science,43(6),841-855。  new window
7.Hane, C. A.、Barnhart, C.、Johnson, E. L.、Marsten, R. E.、Nemhauser, G. L.、Sigismondi, G.(1995)。The Fleet Assignment Problem: Solving a Large-Scale Integer Program。Mathematical Programming,70(1),211-232。  new window
8.Hansen, M.、Kanafani, A.(1989)。International Airline Hubbing in a Competitive Environment。Transportation Planning and Technology,13(1),3-18。  new window
9.Jiang, H.、Barnhart, C.(2013)。Robust Airline Schedule Design in a Dynamic Scheduling Environment。Computers and Operations Research,40(3),831-840。  new window
10.Warburg, V.、Hansen, T. G.、Larsen, A.、Norman, H.、Andersson, E.(2008)。Dynamic Airline Scheduling: An Analysis of the Potentials of Refleeting and Retiming。Journal of Air Transport Management,14(4),163-167。  new window
11.顏上堯、何淑萍(19940300)。飛航排程暨班次表之建立。運輸計劃,23(1),73-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Etschmaier, M. M.、Mathaisel, D. F. X.(1985)。Airline Scheduling: An Overview。Transportation Science,19(2),127-138。  new window
學位論文
1.郭仲偉(2002)。航空公司之服務品質對出國旅客選擇航空公司之影響(碩士論文)。逢甲大學,台中市。  延伸查詢new window
2.巫永隆(1998)。航空公司在軸輻式路網下之靜態與動態競爭賽局模式(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.李銘杰(2002)。變動需求下飛航排程暨班次表建立之研究(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林為廉(2000)。臺灣地區航空公司服務品質與票價競爭之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.柯益立(1999)。合作賽局理論在航空公司聯營競爭行為模式之應用(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.傅曾志(2003)。隨機性需求飛航排程模式與評估方法之研究(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉得昌(2000)。國內航線旅次需求型態推估與班次起飛時間之訂定(博士論文)。國立交通大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張宮熊(2009)。賽局:又稱博奕論。高雄:玲果國際文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.McCain, Roger A.、陳建良(2006)。賽局理論。智勝文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top