資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
(3.144.87.206)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
兩岸相互建構的經貿自由化規範之理念因素分析:國際關係規範取向建構主義的分析觀點
書刊名:
復興崗學報
作者:
郭雪真
作者(外文):
Kuo, Hsueh-chen
出版日期:
2014
卷期:
104
頁次:
頁101-120
主題關鍵詞:
建構主義
;
國際規範
;
世界貿易組織
;
兩岸經濟合作架構協議
;
Constructivism
;
International norms
;
World Trade Organization
;
Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:
6
點閱:14
當前國內政治學界對於兩岸發展經貿自由化的研究,多是從兩岸政治與經濟觀點,少有從國際關係理論建構主義觀點探討經貿自由化背後所蘊含的理念因素( ideational factors),例如規範、認同與文化,這些理念因素不同於強調政治經貿利益的物質因素,或許兩岸相互建構的經貿自由化規範本身並不是只考量經貿利益,而是更考量到這些理念因素,否則中國大陸的「讓利」或台灣內部的爭論也就無法解釋了。尤其是海峽兩岸已經加入「世界貿易組織」( World Trade Organization),在國際經貿自由化的規範下,兩岸必須接受其規範而認同成為國際社會的成員。因此,兩岸經濟合作架構協議( ECFA)即是在這些理念因素相互作用下形成。規範取向建構主義重視理念因素在形塑國家互動的作用,國際關係事務是相關國家相互建構而成。規範結構與理念結構對行為者的認同有影響,國家的社會認同是由國際社會的規範結構與理念結構所組成,而且這些結構是國家實務的產物。因此,建構主義重視認同、規範與文化在國際關係與國家互動的形成過程與作用,進而限制國家行為。本文嘗試從規範取向建構主義探討理念因素在此建構過程中的作用,是否真如建構主義所主張的,或是理念因素必然產生共同的規範、認同或文化。其間,身為行為主體的中國大陸與台灣如何受到這些理念因素的影響,進而發展出經貿合作的兩岸關係。
以文找文
Most researches on the development of economic-trade liberalization in domestic communities of political science have been based on political- economic perspectives, based on constructivism to explore the ideational factors, such as norms, identity and culture, behind the liberalization that has been rarely seen. These ideational factors are different from the material factors which political-economic perspectives emphasized. The economic-trade liberalization norms mutually constructed by the both polities across Taiwan Strait have not only considered the economic-trade interests but also more considered these ideational factors, if not, how can we explain the Mainland China transferred benefits to Taiwan without considering its own interests, and how can we explain the related debates in Taiwan. Since both polities across Taiwan Strait have become the members of the World Trade Organization, under the international economic-trade norms, both polities should accept the norms and identified themselves as members of international society. Therefore, the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement(ECFA)is formed under these ideational factors’ inter-effects. Constructivism emphasized the ideational factors’ effects in formation of the interactions among states; international affairs are mutually constructed by related states. The structures of norms and ideas have effects on actors’ identities, the social identity of state is constituted by the structures of norms and ideas of international society, and these structures are results of state practices or international practices. Constructivism considered mostly the effects of identities, norms, and cultures on the process of formations of international relations and interactions among states, and on limiting states’ behaviors. This paper is based on constructivism to explore these factors’ effects on the process of constructing identity in both polities across Taiwan Strait.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
袁易(20090600)。重新思考外空安全:一個中國建構安全規範之解析。中國大陸研究,52(2),1-41。
延伸查詢
2.
Adler, Emanuel(1997)。Imagined ( security ) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations。Millennium,26(2),249-277。
3.
Buchanan, Ruth(2003)。Perpetual Peace or Perpetual Process: Global Civil Society and Cosmopolitan Legality at the World Trade Organization。Leiden Journal of International Law,16(4),673-699。
4.
Cortell, Andrew P.、Davis, James W.(2005)。When Norms Clash: International Norms, Domestic Practices, and Japan’s Internationalisation of GATT/WTO。Review of International Studies,31(1),3-25。
5.
Ford, Jane(2003)。A Social Theory of Trade Regime Change: GATT to WTO。International Studies Review,41(3),115-138。
6.
Duvall, Raymond、Havercroft, Jonathan(2008)。Taking Sovereignty Out of this World: Space Weapons and Empire of the Future。Review of International Studies,34(4),755-775。
7.
Johnston, Alastair Iain(2008)。Law-Making Through the Operational Activities of International Organizations。George Washington International Law,40(1),87-122。
8.
Kahl, Colin H.(1998)。Constructing a Separate Peace: Constructivism, Collective Liberal Identity, and Democratic Peace。Security Studies,8(2/3),94-144。
9.
Pelagidis, Theodore、Papasotiriou, Harry(2002)。Globalisation or Regionalism? States, Mmarkets and the Structure of International Trade。Review of International Studies,28(3),519-535。
10.
Nadelmann, Ethan(1990)。Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society。International Organization,44(4),479-526。
11.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas(2000)。Let’s Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics。International Organization,54(1),1-39。
12.
Wiener, Antje(2007)。The Dual Quality of Norms and Governance beyond the State: Sociological and Normative Approaches to ‘Interaction’。Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy,10(1),47-69。
13.
Finnemore, Martin(1993)。International Organization as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and Science Policy。International Organization,47(4),565-598。
14.
Frederking, B.(1998)。Resolving Security Dilemmas: A Constructivist Explanation of the Cold War。International Politics,35(2),207-232。
15.
Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2001)。Why Comply? Social Norms Learning and European Identity Change。International Organization,55(3),553-588。
16.
Cortell, Andrew P.、Davis, James W., Jr.(1996)。How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms。International Studies Quarterly,40(4),451-478。
17.
Cortell, Andrew P.、Davis, James W. Jr.(2000)。Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norm: A Research Agenda。International Studies Review,2(1),65-87。
18.
Hurd, Ian(1999)。Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics。International Organization,53(2),379-408。
19.
Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2005)。International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework。International Organization,59(4),801-826。
20.
Haas, Peter M.(1992)。Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination。International Organization,46(1),1-35。
21.
Kratochwil, Friedrich、Ruggie, John Gerard(1986)。International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State。International Organization,40(4),753-775。
22.
Wendt, Alexander E.(1994)。Collective Identity Formation and The International State。American Political Science Review,88(2),384-396。
23.
Finnemore, Martha、Sikkink, Kathryn(1998)。International Norm Dynamics and Political Change。International Organization,52(4),887-917。
24.
Checkel, Jeffrey T.(1999)。Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe。International Studies Quarterly,43(1),83-114。
25.
Legro, Jeffrey W.(1997)。Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the 'failure' of Internationalism。International Organization,51(1),31-63。
會議論文
1.
Busby, Joshua W.(2001)。Norms-Driven Coalitions, Domestic Norms Take-up, and the Second Image Reversed: the Case of the U.S. Anti-child Labor Movement。The 42nd Annual International Studies Association Meeting,(會議日期: 2001/02/21-02/24)。Chicago, Illinois。
2.
Owen, John M.(1998)。Pessimistic Constructivism: Common Identities, Common Enemies。The annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,(會議日期: 1998/09/02-09/05)。Boston。
3.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas(1998)。The Socialization of International Norms into Domestic Practices: Arguing and Strategic Adaptation in the Human Rights Area。the Ideas, Culture and Political Analysis Workshop,(會議日期: 1998/05/15-16)。Princeton:Princeton University。
圖書
1.
Hurd, Ian(2008)。States and Rules, Norms and Interests。Canadian:Northwestern University。
2.
Keck, Margaret E.、Sikkink, Kathryn(1998)。Activities Beyond Borders。Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press。
3.
Risse, Thomas、Ropp, Stephen C.、Sikkink, Kathryn(1999)。The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change。Cambridge University Press。
4.
Bloom, William(1990)。Personal identity, national identity and international relations。Cambridge University Press。
5.
Chayes, Abram、Chayes, Antonia Handler(1995)。The New Sovereignty: Compliance With International Regulatory Agreements。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。
6.
Finnemore, Martha(1996)。Defining National Interests in International Society。Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press。
7.
Katzenstein, Peter Joachim(1996)。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。New York:Cambridge University Press。
其他
1.
ECFA(2010)。有關自由時報錯誤報導「ECFA英文版本未經兩岸雙方認可簽署,未經立法院審議,恐不具法律效力」之說明,http://www.ecfa.org.tw/ShowNews.aspx?id=182&year=2010&pid=2&cid=2, 2014/02/20。
延伸查詢
2.
中央社(2009)。連胡會胡錦濤盼雙方共同解決政治難題,http://news.rti.org.tw/index.newsContent.aspx?nid=223295, 2014/02/13。
延伸查詢
3.
ECFA(2010)。經濟部上網公布ECFA英譯文本之説明,http://www.ecfa.org.tw/ShowNews.aspx?id=192&year=2010&pid=2&cid=2, 2014/02/20。
4.
工商時報(1998)。讓台灣先進WTO,石廣生:絕不接受,http://forums.cninatimes.com.tw/report/wto/twcn bargain/871219a1.asp, 2014/02/13。
延伸查詢
5.
人民網(2011)。胡錦濤主席接受美國華爾街日報和華盛頓郵報聯合書面採訪,http://opinion.people.com.cn/GB/13766057.html, 2014/02/22。
延伸查詢
6.
經濟部國際貿易局(2011)。GATT之沿革與WTO之成立,http://www.trade.gov.tw/ctwto/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeID=339&pid=312887, 2014/02/12。
7.
朱鎔基(2003)。政府工作報告--2003年3月5日在第十屆全國人民代表大會第一次會議上,http://www.66163.com/Funan w/news/smrb/030320/112.html, 2014/02/12。
延伸查詢
8.
經濟部國際貿易局(2005)。我國申請GATT/WTO之歷史記要,http://www.trade.gov.twたwto/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeID=354&pid=312950&dlDateRange=all&txt SD=&txt ED=&txt Keyword=&Pageid=0, 2014/02/12。
9.
新浪財經(2006)。中國復關及入世大事記(1947年--2001年),http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/20061110/10013067317.shtml, 2014/02/12。
延伸查詢
10.
蔡英文(2010)。民進黨對馬政府推動ECFA的看法,http://dpppolicy.blogspot.com/2010/02/ecfa11.html, 2014/02/21。
延伸查詢
11.
賴幸媛(2010)。賴主委訪欧洲國策研究院致詞稿:亞太區域和平發展的新契機-從兩岸經濟合作架構協議談起,http://www.mac.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=88868&ctNode=6727&mp=1, 2014/02/13。
延伸查詢
12.
蘇永耀(2010)。與CEPA同日ECFA在重慶簽了,http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/jun/30/today-t1.htm, 2014/02/20。
13.
鍾禎祥(2011)。時過境遷,蔡英文不投公投廢ECFA,http://n.yam.com/anntw/politics/201108/20110823300348.html, 2014/02/22。
延伸查詢
14.
WTO(2002)。Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu ( Chinese Taipei ) and the WTO,http://cwto.trade.gov.tw/kmi.asp?xdurl=kmif.asp&cat=CAT311, 2014/02/12。
圖書論文
1.
Katzenstein, Peter(1993)。Coping with Terrorism: Norms and Internal Security in Germany and Japan。Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。
2.
Reus-Smit, Christian(2005)。Constructivism。Theories of International Relations。Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan。
3.
Jepperson, Ronald L.、Wendt, Alexander、Katzenstein, Peter Joachim(1996)。Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。Columbia University Press。
4.
Sikkink, K.(1993)。The Power of Principled Ideas: Human Rights Policies in the United States and Western Europe。Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change。Ithaca, NY:Cornell Uni. Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
文字探勘技術輔助主題分析--以「中國大陸研究」期刊為例
2.
國際關係建構主義理論的國家主權觀:人道干預的挑戰與詮釋
3.
聯合國「主權保護責任」與「人道軍事干預」規範的社會建構:建構主義的觀點
4.
Reality and Implications of ECFA
5.
國際法對太空活動之規範及適用性探討
6.
中國大陸太空發展之挑戰與契機:新自由制度主義的觀點
7.
WTO V.S. ECFA: Duality and Dilemma in Global Trade Mechanism
8.
從國際經濟法及ECFA架構論新時代兩岸經貿關係發展
9.
臺灣與菲律賓之間的經貿互動關係
10.
重新思考外空安全:一個中國建構安全規範之解析
11.
印度參與WTO的談判策略:建構主義的分析
1.
俄屬遠東黃禍論研究-身份、利益的解構與建構
1.
外交戰略與國際地位
2.
外交戰略與國際地位
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code