臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國際關係建構主義理論的國家主權觀：人道干預的挑戰與詮釋
書刊名：東吳政治學報
作者：郭雪真
作者(外文)：Kuo, Hsueh-chen
出版日期：2014
卷期：32:4
頁次：頁125-172
主題關鍵詞：國家主權；主權國家；建構主義；國際規範；保護責任；State sovereignty；Sovereign state；Constructivism；International norm；Responsibility to protect
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:41
  • 點閱點閱:45
國際關係建構主義理論將「主權」視為是「國際規範」（international norm），藉以說明主權是由國際實務或實踐（international practices）所組成的社會規範建構體。建構主義主張國際規範源自於理念與認同體，對國家行為產生組成作用，國際規範合法化了國家目標，同時界定國家身分認同體與利益的形成。國際規範是國際社會對國家適當行為的共同期待，建立在維護國際安全及秩序現狀的前提下，以符合大多數現狀國家的共同利益與期待，和國家之間的互惠與相互承諾，而能合理期待其他國家的行為與國際規範體系的運作與程序，使得國際規範與機制更加制度化，並更具有國際法律的意涵與拘束力，從而影響國際行為主體（主要是國家）的行為。建構主義認為，主權的產生源自國家間「相互主體的共享理解」的國際實務，進而發展成為國家內化或社會化的國際規範，組成與約制國家的行為。在國家遵守順從國際規範的觀點之下，國家間的互動關係形成規範、認同體與利益為其主要內涵，產生約制和組成雙重性質的國際規範約制國家的行為，國家進而藉由國際社會化或學習而內化主權為規範。換言之，在順從「國家主權」國際規範下，國家以「主權國家」的身份認同互動，形塑國家利益與各種國際規範，這些國際規範約制與組成國家的行為，經由國家間的社會化或學習，而使「國家主權」內化成主權國家需要順從的國際規範。本文嘗試以人道干預對國家主權的挑戰，作為說明建構主義的國家主權觀點如何詮釋這樣的挑戰，以強調建構主義認為主權是一個國際實務的論述，是一個社會建構體。本文論述主要為四部分，第一部分從國家主權理論的傳統論述開始，說明西方國家主權理論發展的歷史過程；第二部分再說明建構主義的國家主權論述，以呈現其強調主權為國際實務論述及社會建構體的主張；第三部分說明人道干預對國家主權理論的挑戰，以呈現國際實務對於主權理論的影響；第四部分說明建構主義如何詮釋人道干預的挑戰，並就其詮釋提出評論。
Constructivism takes sovereignty as a discourse of international norm to explain sovereignty as a social construction of international practices. Constructivism- argued international norms come from ideas and identities, and have constitutive and regulatory effects on state's behaviors. International norms give the legitimacy to the states' objectives, and define the formations of states' identities and interests. International norms are collective expectations of international society on state's proper behaviors; their premises are based on maintaining the international security and order of existing status which to be content with the majority of states' interests and expectations. With reciprocities and mutual commitments able to reasonably expect each other's behaviors and the operational procedures, the international norms and mechanisms are more institutionalized, and more legalized implications are binds to restrain international agencies' (states are the majority) behaviors. Basically, the constructivism approach to sovereignty is based on the perspectives that sovereignty comes from the shared understanding which exist intersubjectively in international practices; states socialize and internalize it as an international norm. States' compliance to international norms, and the interactions among states form norms, identities, and interests; these social constructions produce the international norms to restrain and to constitute states' behaviors. States internalize the sovereignty as an international norm by way of international socialization and learning. This article tries to illustrate how constructivism interprets the challenges of humanitarian intervention to the state sovereignty, in order to emphasize constructivism's argument in which the sovereignty is a discourse of international practice and a social construction. This article proceeds in four sections: the first section starts from the traditional discourse of state sovereignty theories to show the historical development of Western state sovereignty theories; the second section explores the discourse of constructivism on state sovereignty to emphasis its perspectives which sovereignty is a discourse of international practice and a social construction; the third section illustrates the challenges of humanitarian intervention to express the influence on state sovereignty theory; the fourth section illustrates how the constructivism interprets the challenges, and gives my own comments on the interpretations.
期刊論文
1.蔡育岱(20101200)。國際人權的擴散與實踐：以《國家保護責任》的倡議為例。問題與研究，49(4)，135-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Lake, David A.(200309)。The New Sovereignty in International Relations。International Studies Review，5(3)，303-323。  new window
3.Shaw, Karena(2004)。Knowledge, Foundations, Politics。International Studies Review，6(4)，7-20。  new window
4.Osiander, Andreas(2001)。Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth。International Organization，55(2)，251-287。  new window
5.Ayub, Fatima、Kouvo, Sari(2008)。Righting the course? Humanitarian Intervention, the War on Terror and the Future of Afghanistan。International Affairs，84(4)，641-657。  new window
6.Barnett, Michael(2001)。Humanitarianism with a Sovereign Face: UNHCR in the Global Undertow。International Migration Review，35(1)，244-277。  new window
7.Barnett, Michael(2009)。Evolution without Progress? Humanitarianism in a World of Hurt。International Organization，63(4)，621-663。  new window
8.Bellamy, Alex J.(2013)。The Responsibility to Protect: Added Value or Hot Air?。Cooperation and Conflict，48(3)，333-357。  new window
9.Chopra, Jarat、Weiss, Thomas G.(1992)。Sovereignty Is No Longer Sacrosanct: Codifying Humanitarian Intervention。Ethics and International Affairs，6(1)，95-117。  new window
10.Deng, Francis M.(1995)。Frontiers of Sovereignty: a Framework of Protection, Assistance, and Development for the Internally Displaced。Leiden Journal of International Law，8(2)，249-286。  new window
11.Lowenheim, Oded(2003)。'Do Ourselves Credit and Render a Lasting Service to Mankind': British Moral Prestige, Humanitarian Intervention, and the Barbary Pirates。International Studies Quarterly，47(1)，23-48。  new window
12.Moses, Jeremy、Bahador, Babak、Wright, Tessa(2011)。The Iraq War and the Responsibility to Protect: Uses, Abuses and Consequences for the Future of Humanitarian Intervention。Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding，5(4)，347-367。  new window
13.De Waal, Alex(2007)。Darfur and the Failure of the Responsibility to Protect。International Affairs，83(6)，1039-1054。  new window
14.Acharya, Amitav(2007)。State Sovereignty After 9/11: Disorganised Hypocrisy。Political Studies，55(2)，274-296。  new window
15.Anghie, Antony(2009)。Rethinking Sovereignty in International Law。Annual Review of Law and Social Science，5，291-310。  new window
16.Avbelj, Matej(2014)。Theorizing Sovereignty and European Integration。Ratio Juris，27(3)，344-363。  new window
17.Bartelson, Jens(2006)。The Concept of Sovereignty Revisited。European Journal of International Law，17(2)，463-474。  new window
18.Besson, Samantha(2011)。Sovereignty, International Law and Democracy。The European Journal of International Law，22(2)，373-387。  new window
19.Coleman, Aaron N.(2012)。Debating the Nature of State Sovereignty: Nationalists, State Sovereigntists, and the Treaty of Paris (1783)。The Journal of Historical Sociology，12(3)，309-340。  new window
20.Glanville, Luke(2013)。The 'Myth' of Traditional Sovereignty。International Studies Quarterly，57(1)，79-90。  new window
21.Goldsmith, Jack(200004)。Sovereignty, International Relations, and International Law。Stanford Law Review，52(4)，959-986。  new window
22.Goodhart, Michael、Taninchev, Stacy B.(2013)。The New Sovereigntist Challenge for Global Governance: Democracy without Sovereignty。International Studies Quarterly，55(4)，1047-1068。  new window
23.Heinze, Eric A.(2006)。Humanitarian Intervention and the War in Iraq: Norms, Discourse, and State Practice。Parameters，36(1)，20-35。  new window
24.Jackson, John H.(2003)。Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to Outdated Concept。The American Journal of International Law，97(4)，782-802。  new window
25.Johnson, Curtis(1985)。The Hobbesian Conception of Sovereignty and Aristotle's Politics。Journal of the History of Ideas，46(3)，327-347。  new window
26.Keohane, Robert O.(2002)。Ironies of Sovereignty: The European Union and the United States。Journal of Common Market Studies，40(4)，743-765。  new window
27.Krasner, Stephen D.(2001)。Rethinking the Sovereignty State Model。Review of International Studies，27(5)，17-42。  new window
28.Kuus, M.(2002)。Sovereignty for Security? The Discourse of Sovereignty in Estonia。Political Geography，21(3)，393-412。  new window
29.Lake, David A.(2007)。Delegating Divisible Sovereignty: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield。Review of International Organizations，2(3)，219-237。  new window
30.Linklater, Andrew(1996)。Citizenship and Sovereignty in the Post-Westphalian State。European Journal of International Relations，2(1)，77-103。  new window
31.Mulga, R. G.(1970)。Aristotle's Sovereign。Political Studies，18(4)，518-522。  new window
32.Nagan, Winston P.、Haddad, Aitza M.(2012)。Sovereignty in Theory and Practice。San Diego International Law Journal，13，421-519。  new window
33.Priban, Jiri(2013)。The Self-Referential Semantics of Sovereignty: A Systems Theoretical Response to (Post) Sovereignty Studies。Constellations，20(3)，406-421。  new window
34.Slaughter, Anne-Marie(1995)。International Law in a World of Liberal States。European Journal of International Law，6(3)，503-538。  new window
35.Solomon, Ty.(2006)。Norms and Human Rights in International Relations。Political Studies Review，4(1)，36-47。  new window
36.Sriram, Handra Lekha(200605)。International Law, International Relations Theory and Post-Atrocity Justice: Towards a Genuine Dialogue。International Affairs，82(3)，467-478。  new window
37.Strange, Susan(1999)。The Westfailure System。Review of International Studies，25(3)，367-416。  new window
38.Evans, Gareth(2006)。From Humanitarian Intervention to the Responsibility to Protect。Wisconsin International Law Journal，24(3)，702-722。  new window
39.Weisburd, A. M.(1999)。Implications of International Relations Theory for the International Law of Human Rights。Columbia Journal of Transnational Law，38(1)，45-112。  new window
40.Weiss, Thomas G.(2006)。R2P After 9/11 and the World Summit。Wisconsin International Law Journal，24(3)，741-760。  new window
41.郭雪真(20111200)。人道軍事干預與國際人道法：美國反恐戰爭中關達那摩灣(Guantánamo Bay)被拘禁者釋憲案例分析。復興崗學報，101，15-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.潘光哲(20131200)。「殖民地」的概念史：從「新名詞」到「關鍵詞」。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊，82，55-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.Slaughter, Anne-Marie(1993)。International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda。American Journal of International Law，87(2)，205-239。  new window
44.Krasner, Stephen D.(2004)。Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failing States。International Security，29(2)，85-120。  new window
45.Keohane, Robert O.(1997)。International Relations and International Law: Two Optics。Harvard International Law Journal，38(2)，487-502。  new window
46.Krasner, Stephen D.(2001)。Abiding Sovereignty。International Political Science Review，22(3)，229-251。  new window
47.Sohn, Louis B.(1982)。The New International Law: Protection of the Rights of Individuals Rather than States。American University Law Review，32(1)，1-64。  new window
48.Finnemore, Martha、Sikkink, Kathryn(2001)。Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics。Annual Review of Political Science，4(1)，391-416。  new window
49.蔡育岱(20101200)。「人權與主權的對立、共存與規避」：論述《國家保護責任》在人道干預上的意涵及重要性。東吳政治學報，28(4)，1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.Reus-Smit, Christian(2001)。Human Rights and the Social Construction of Sovereignty。Review of International Studies，27(4)，519-538。  new window
51.楊永明(19960600)。民主主權：政治理論中主權概念之演變與主權理論新取向。政治科學論叢，7，125-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
52.Strange, Susan(1997)。The Erosion of the State。Current History，96(613)，365-369。  new window
53.Ashley, Richard K.、Walker, Robert B. J.(1990)。Conclusion: Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies。International Studies Quarterly，34(3)，367-416。  new window
54.Barnett, Michael(2005)。Humanitarianism Transformed。Perspectives on Politics，3(4)，723-740。  new window
55.Finnemore, Martha、Sikkink, Kathryn(1998)。International Norm Dynamics and Political Change。International Organization，52(4)，887-917。  new window
56.Pace, R.、Deller, N.(2005)。Preventing Future Genocides: An International Responsibility to Protect。World Order，36(4)，15-32。  new window
57.Charvet, John(1997)。The Idea of State Sovereignty and The Right of Humanitarian Intervention。International Political Science Review，18(1)，39-48。  new window
會議論文
1.Kikoler, Naomi(2009)。Responsibility to Protect。International Conference: Protecting People in Conflict and Crisis: Responding to the Challenges of a Changing World，(會議日期: 2009/09/22-09/24)。Oxford：Harris Manchester College and Queen Elizabeth House。  new window
2.Evans, Gareth(2007)。Delivering on the Responsibility to Protect: Four Misunderstandings, Three Challenges and How to Overcome Them。SEF Symposium 2007。The Responsibility to Protect(R2P)。  new window
3.Potter, Donald W.(2004)。State Responsibility, Sovereignty, and Failed States。The Australasian Political Studies Association Conference，(會議日期: 2004/09/29-10/01)。Adelaide, South Austalia：University of Adelaide。  new window
研究報告
1.Ban, Ki-moon(2009)。Implementing the Responsibility to Protect。  new window
圖書
1.小查爾斯‧愛德華‧梅里亞姆、畢洪海(2006)。盧梭以來的主權學說史。北京：法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Biersteker, Thomas J.、Weber, Cynthia(1996)。State Sovereignty as Social Construct。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Deng, Francis M.、Kimaro, Sadikiel、Lyons, Terrence、Rothchild, Donald、Zartman, I. Williams(1996)。Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa。Washington, DC：Brookings Institution Press。  new window
4.Anghie, Antony(2007)。Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Bickerton, Christopher(2007)。Politics without Sovereignty: A Critique of Contemporary International Relations。London：University College London Press。  new window
6.Bodin, Jean(2009)。Books of Commonwealth。New York：CreareSpace。  new window
7.Breuilly, John(2007)。The Formation of the First German Nation-State, 1800-1871。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
8.Cohen, Jean L.(2012)。Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Fitzpatrick, Matthew P.(2008)。Liberal Imperialism in Germany: Expansionism and Nationalism, 1848-1884。New York：Berghahn Books。  new window
10.Franklin, Julian H.(1981)。John Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty: Mixed Monarchy and the Right of Resistance in the Political Thought of the English Revolution。New York：The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge。  new window
11.Hewitson, Mark(2010)。Nationalism in Germany, 1848-1866: Revolutionary Nation。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
12.Holsti, Kalevi J.(2006)。Taming the Sovereignty: Institutional Change in International Politics。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Keitner, Chimene J.(2007)。The Paradox of Nationalism: The French Revolution and Its Meanings for Contemporary Nation Building。Albany, NY：SUNY Press。  new window
14.Kurlander, Eric(2006)。The Price of Exclusion: Ethnicity, National Identity and the Decline of German Liberalism, 1898-1933。New York：Berghahn Books。  new window
15.Lyons, Gene M.、Mastanduno, Michael(1995)。Beyond Westphalia? : State Sovereignty and International hntcwcntion。Baltimore, MD：Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
16.Merlingen, Michael(1998)。From Westphalia to Post Westphalia。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
17.Reus-Smit, Christian(2013)。Individual Rights and the Making of International System。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
18.Riall, Lucy(2009)。Risorgimento: The History of Italy from Napoleon to Nation State。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
19.Stumpf, Christoph A.(2006)。The Grotian Theology of International Law: Hugo Grotius and the Moral Foundations of International Relations。New York：Waltzer de Gruyter。  new window
20.ICISS(2001)。The Responsibility to Protect。Ottawa：International Development Research Centre。  new window
21.Philpott, D.(2001)。Revolutions in sovereignty:How ideas shaped modern international Relations。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
22.楊澤偉(2003)。國際法新論。北京：中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.楊澤偉(2006)。主權論--國際法上的主權問題及其發展趨勢。北京：北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.Reus-Smit, Christian(1999)。The Moral Purpose of the State: Cultural. Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
25.黑格爾、范揚、張企泰(1985)。法哲學原理或自然法和國家學綱要。臺北：里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.Hobsbawn, Eric J.(1996)。The Age of Revolution, 1789-1848。New York：Vintage。  new window
27.Camilleri, Joseph、Falk, Jim(1992)。The End of Sovereignty? The Politics of a Shrinking and Fragmenting World。Brookfield, Vt.：Edward Elgar Publishing Limited。  new window
28.Bodin, Jean(1992)。On Sovereignty: Four Chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
29.Bartelson, Jens(1995)。A Genealogy of Sovereignty。Cambridge University Press。  new window
30.Wendt, Alexander E.(1999)。Social Theory of International Politics。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。  new window
31.Weber, C.(1995)。Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange。Cambridge：New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
32.Rousseau, Jean-Jacques(1997)。The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings。New York。  new window
33.Locke, John、瞿菊農、葉啟芳(1982)。政府論。北京：商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
34.Finnemore, Martha(1996)。Defining National Interests in International Society。Ithaca, NY：Cornell University Press。  new window
35.Bull, Hedley(1977)。The Anarchical society: A Study of Order in World Politics。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
36.Krasner, Stephen D.(2001)。Problematic Sovereignty: Contested Rules and Political Possibilities。Columbia University Press。  new window
37.Finnemore, Martha(2003)。The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force。Cornell University Press。  new window
38.Waters, Malcolm、徐偉傑(2000)。全球化。臺北市：弘智文化公司。  延伸查詢new window
39.Linklater, Andrew(2007)。Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty, and Humanity。New York：Routledge。  new window
40.Walker, Robert B. J.(1993)。Inside/ Outside: International Relations as Political Theory。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
41.Pieterse, Jan Nederveen(1998)。World Orders in the Making: Humanitarian Intervention and Beyond。Basingstoke：Macmillan。  new window
42.Hoffmann, Stanley(1996)。The Ethics and Politics of Humanitarian Intervention。Notre Dame：University of Notre Dame Press。  new window
43.RATNER, STEVEN R.、ABRAMS, JASON S.(2001)。ACCOUNTABILITY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ATROCITIES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: BEYOND THE NUREMBERG LEGACY。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.Annan, Kofi A.(1999)。Secretary-General Presents His Annual Report to the General Assembly，http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/1999/19990920.sgsm7136.html，(SG/SM/7136/GA/9596)。 2014/02/22。  new window
2.United Nations(2014)。Millennium Report of Secretary-General of the United Nations，https://www.un.org/cyberschoolbus/briefing/report/overview.pdf， 2014/02/12。  new window
3.United Nations(2014)。Resolution Adopted by the General Assemby 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome，http://www.un.org/womenwatch/ods/A-RES-60-1-E.pdf， 2014/02/20。  new window
4.United Nations(2014)。Secretary-General Defends, Clarifies 'Responsibility to Protect' at Berlin Event On 'Responsible Sovereignty: International Cooperation for a Changed World'，http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2008/sgsm11701.doc.htm，(SG/SM/11701)。 2014/02/20。  new window
5.United Nations(2009)。United Nations, Implementing the Responsibility to Protect，http://daccess-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N09/206/10/PDF/N0920610.pdf?OpenElement，(A/63/677)。 2014/02/13。  new window
圖書論文
1.Seresen, Georg(1999)。Sovereignty: Change and Continuity in a Fundamental Institution。Sovereignty at the Millennium。Malden, Mass。  new window
2.Reus-Smit, Christian(2005)。Constructivism。Theories of International Relations。Basingstoke：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
3.Malmvig, Helle(2007)。Humanitarian Intervention and State Sovereignty: a Social Constructivist Analysis。Human Rights in Turmoil: Facing Threats, Consolidating Achievements。Boston：Martinus Nijhoff。  new window
4.Devetak, Richard(1996)。Postmodernism。Theories of International Relations。London：Macmillan。  new window
5.Ilgen, Thomas L.(2003)。Reconfigured Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization。Reconfigured Sovereignty: Multi-Layered Governance in the Global Age。Burlington：Ashgate Publishing。  new window
6.Walker, Robert B. J.(1996)。Space/Time/Sovereignty。Perspectives on Third-World Sovereignty: The Postmodern Paradox。London：Macmillan。  new window
7.Finnemore, M.(1996)。Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
8.Lombardi, Mark Owen(1996)。Third World Problem-Solving and the 'Religion' of Sovereignty: Trends and Prospects。Perspectives on Third World Sovereignty: The Postmodern Paradox。London：Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：638（臺灣：632，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67497399
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上