:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:地理資訊系統在集域分析及地景空間的應用:以鵝鑾鼻第三/四文化相遺址為例
書刊名:考古人類學刊
作者:劉亭攸
作者(外文):Liu, Ting-yu
出版日期:2013
卷期:79
頁次:頁47-70
主題關鍵詞:鵝鑾鼻第三文化相鵝鑾鼻第四文化相集域分析費由面視域分析動物遺留地景空間OLP Ⅲ phaseOLP Ⅳ phaseCatchment analysisCost surfaceViewshed analysisFauna remainsLandscape room
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:19
集域分析(catchment analysis)在研究方法的發展上,從簡單的同心圓逐漸修正,並在地理資訊系統(geographic information system)的幫助下將更多變數納入考量。而同時考量取得海、陸資源的能力並建立模型,可以對遺址居民在其環境中的活動有更細緻的了解。透過費由面和視域分析之後,可發現鵝鑾鼻第三/四文化相遺址在集域範圍與地景空間上相互對應。而共享同一地景空間的龜山與猴仙洞遺址,在活動範圍上也各自佔據了山與海的活動範圍,可能衍生出不同的互動模式,應可作為日後檢視兩遺址動物遺留與生業工具時的參考依據。
Through the calculation of cost surface, GIS enables site catchment analysis to move beyond models with simple geometric circles to allow for irregular ranges by considering the different costs of transportation over landscapes. Taking both terrestrial and marine data into consideration, the different accessibility of resources within a site catchment can be understood in more detail, and archaeologists can use this information to create a model of interaction between sites and their environment.According to the location of six sites from the O-luan-pi III/IV phase, and through the analysis of cost-surface and viewshed of digital elevation model (DEM) in GIS, I divide the coastal area of the O-luan-pi peninsula into four different landscape rooms. Two landscape rooms are separately occupied by a single site, and the other two landscape rooms each have two sites within them. It would seem natural to expect that catchments of sites sharing the same landscape room would overlap and that the activities of the sites on land would influence each other on land. However, through the analyses of current and wind data, it appears that sites sharing the same landscape room have different accessibility to terrestrial and marine environments. These variations may have led those sites to maintain their independent site catchments rather than competingwith each other for resources.
期刊論文
1.Roper, D. C.(1979)。The Method and Theory of Site Catchment Analysis: A Review。Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory,2,119-140。  new window
2.陳瑪玲(20000100)。鵝鑾鼻Ⅲ-Ⅳ期文化相的聚落模式與系統。國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊,54,63-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳玉美(20030600)。考古學中人與環境關係的研究:以Site Catchment為例。國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊,60,97-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳瑪玲(19980900)。What Dating Results Imply: edefining the Separation of OLP Phase Ⅲ and Phase Ⅳ, and the Potential Relationship between OLP Phase Ⅱ and PhaseⅢ。國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊,53,125-143。new window  new window
研究報告
1.劉益昌、李匡悌(1993)。國立海洋生物博物館基地龜山史前遺址調查評估研究報告。屏東:國立海洋生物博物館籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
2.李光周、鄭永勝、凌平彰、陳維鈞、韓旭東、陳有貝(1985)。墾丁國家公園考古調查報告。國立臺灣大學文學院人類學系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭建文。論台灣史前時代的文化變遷與區域關係-自鵝鑾鼻第二遺址出發的發掘、思考與討論(博士論文)。臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Chen, Maa-ling(1997)。Settlement Patterns, Subsistence Systems and Their Changes in Kenting National Park During O-Luan-Pi Phases III and IV(博士論文)。Arizona State University。  new window
圖書
1.王德琦、墾丁國家公園管理處(1985)。墾丁國家公園史前文化及生態資源。屏東:內政部營建署墾丁國家公園管理處。  延伸查詢new window
2.臧振華(1994)。臺閩地區考古遺址普查研究計畫報告(第二期)。台北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
3.臧振華、陳仲玉、劉益昌(1994)。臺閩地區考古遺址─:高雄縣、高雄市。台北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉益昌、李匡悌(1995)。恆春半島史前海岸聚落的比較研究--以龜山史前遺址和鵝鑾鼻第二史前遺址為例。屏東:國立海洋生物博物館籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
5.Castro, Peter、Huber, Michael E.(2005)。Marine Biology。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.Chisholm, Michael(2007)。Rural Settlement and Land Use。New Brunswick:Aldine Transaction。  new window
7.Conolly, James、Lake, Mark(2006)。Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Gaffney, Vincent、Stancic, Zoran(1991)。GIS Approaches to Regional Analysis: A Case Study of the Island of Hvar。Ljubljana:Znanstveni institut Filozofske fakultete。  new window
9.Flannery, Kent V.(1976)。The Early Mesoamerican Village。New York:Academic Press。  new window
10.Lock, Gary R.(2003)。Using Computers in Archaeology: Towards Virtual Pasts。New York:Routledge。  new window
11.Reitz, Elizabeth Jean、Wing, Elizabeth S.(2008)。Zooarchaeology。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Smith, Adam、嚴復(2009)。原富。台北:臺灣商務。  延伸查詢new window
13.von Thünen, Johann Heinrich、顧綏祿(1947)。孤立國:孤立國與農業及國民經濟之關係。上海:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bell, Tyler、Lock, Gary R.(2000)。Topographic and Cultural Influences on Walking the Ridgeway in Later Prehistoric Times。Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies。Tokyo:Ohmsha。  new window
2.Boaz, Joel S.、Uleberg, Espen(1995)。The Potential of GIS-Based Studies of Iron Age Cultural Landscape in Eastern Norway。Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective。Bnstol, PA:Taylor& Francis。  new window
3.Boaz, Joel S.、Uleberg, Espen(2000)。Quantifying the Non-Quantifiable: Studying Hunter-Gatherer Landscape。Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies。Tokyo:Ohmsha。  new window
4.Higgs, Eric Sidney(1975)。Site Catchment Analysis: A Concise Guide to field Methods。Palaeoeconomy。London:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Higgs, Eric Sidney、Vita-Finzi, Claudio(1972)。Prehistoic Economies: A Territorial Approach。Papers in Economic Prehistory。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Lock, Gary R.、Harris, Trevor M.(1996)。Danebury Revisited: An English Iron Age Hillfort in a Digital Landscape。Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Zvelebil, Marek(1983)。Site Catchment Analysis and Hunter-Gatherer Resource Use。Ecological Models in Economic Prehistory。Tempe, Arizona:Arizona State University。  new window
8.Wheatley, David(1995)。Cumulative Viewshed Analysis: A GIS-Based Method for Investigating Intervisibility, and Its Archaeological Application。Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective。Bristol, PA。  new window
9.Verhagen, Philip、McGlade, James、Gili, Silvia、Risch, Roberto(1995)。Some Criteria for Modelling Socio-Economic Activities in the Bronze Age of South-East Spain。Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective。Bristol, PA:Taylor & Francis。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE