資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.148.145.236)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Why the Enzyme Model of Modularity Fails to Explain Higher Cognitive Processes
書刊名:
國立臺灣大學哲學論評
作者:
洪子偉
作者(外文):
Hung, Tzu-wei
出版日期:
2014
卷期:
48
頁次:
頁159-189
主題關鍵詞:
酵素模型
;
酵素計算
;
大量模組假說
;
訊號配置
;
整體計算
;
Enzyme model
;
Enzymatic computation
;
Massive modularity hypothesis
;
Allocation problem
;
Global computation
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:48
「酵素模型」指的是借用生物學中酵素催化機制的概念,來說明認知科學中「大量模組假說」在計算與功能層次上有關資訊處理與分配之模型。酵素模型的最大優點在於回應了「訊號配置」與「整體計算」兩難題,從而替大量模組假說提供有利的辯護基礎。但本文之目的,在論證酵素模型的這兩個回應並不成立。一方面,酵素模型在避免訊號配置的無限後退時會產生新的困難。另一方面,要說明整體計算至少得滿足兩個必要條件:一是跨模組的訊號交換是可能的、二在於模組能夠不只是針對輸入訊號的語法結構來處理訊號。本文將論證酵素模型頂多說明如何滿足第一個必要條件,而沒有釐清第二個必要條件如何在該模型中實現。換言之,酵素模型對兩難題的回應不成立。因此,酵素模型無法用以支持大量模組假說。
以文找文
The enzyme model (EM), inspired by biological enzyme catalysis, is a computational-functional description of information processing and distribution in modular cognitive systems. It has been argued that EM offers advantages in solving both the allocation problem and global computation and thus may play a role in upholding the massive modularity hypothesis (MMH). This paper, however, argues that EM solutions are untenable, as EM avoids the infinite regress of allocation problem only at a high cost and with several critical drawbacks. Moreover, to clarify global processes, EM needs to satisfy two necessary conditions: first to demonstrate that the EM allows cross module communication, and second to be sensitive to not only the syntax but also the semantics of representations. I argue that EM only satisfies the first condition and thus fails to hold.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Barrett, H. C.(2005)。Enzymatic Computation and Cognitive Modularity。Mind & Language,20(3),259-287。
2.
Boyer, P.、Petersen, M. B.(2012)。The Naturalness of (Many) Social Institutions: Evolved Cognition as Their Foundation。Journal of Institutional Economics,8(1),1-25。
3.
Capone, A.(2011)。The Attributive/Referential Distinction, Pragmatics, Modularity of Mind and Modularization。Australian Journal of Linguistics,31(2),153-186。
4.
Chomsky, N.(2000)。Language from an Internalist Perspective. Talk given at Centre for Philosophical Studies. Kingâs Part 2 of "Language and Nature。Mind,104(413),27-61。
5.
Cohen, A. S.、German, T. C.(2010)。A Reaction Time Advantage for Calculating Beliefs over Public Representations Signals Domain Specificity for Theory of Mind。Cognition,115(3),417-425。
6.
Cox, J. R.、Griggs, R. A.(1982)。The Effects of Experience on Performance in Wason’s Selection Task。Memory & Cognition,10,496-502。
7.
Finney, E. M.、Fine, I.、Dobkins, K. R.(2001)。Visual Stimuli Activate Auditory Cortex in the Deaf。Nature Neuroscience,4(12),1171-1173。
8.
Griffiths, T. L.、Christian, B. R.、Kalish, M. L.(2008)。Using Category Structures to Test Iterated Learning as a Methodfor Identifying Inductive Biases。Cognitive Science,32,68-107。
9.
Kaplan, M.(2001)。Environment Complexity Stimulates Visual Cortex Neurogensis: Death of a Dogma and a Research Career。Trends in Neuroscience,24(10),617-620。
10.
Kempermann, G.、Gage, F. H.(2002)。Genetic Influence on Phenotypic Differentiation in Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis。Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res.,134,1-12。
11.
Machery, E.(2010)。Philosophy of Psychology。Philosophy of the Special Sciences,262-292。
12.
Magnasco, M. O.(1997)。Chemical Kinetics is Turing Universal。Physical Review Letters,78(6),1190-1193。
13.
Pollard, P.、Evans, J.(1987)。Content and Context Effects in Reasoning。American Journal of Psychology,100(1),41-60。
14.
Sadato, N.、Pascual-Leone, A.、Grafman, J.、Ibanez, V.、Deiber, M.-P.、Dold, G.、Hallett, M.(1996)。Activation of the Primary Visual Cortex by Braille Reading in Blind Subjects。Nature,380,526-528。
15.
Samuels, R.(1998)。What Brain Wonât Tell Us about the Mind: A Critique of Neurobiological Argument against Representational Nativism。Mind and Language,13(4),548-570。
16.
Shams, L.、Kamitani, Y.、Shimojo, S.(2000)。What You See is What You Hear。Nature,408,788。
17.
Shapiro, E.(2012)。A Mechanical Turing Machine: Blueprint for a Biomolecular Computer。Interface Focus,2(4),497-503。
18.
Sperber, D.(2001)。An Evolutionary Perspective on Testimony and Argumentation。Philosophical Topics,29,401-413。
19.
Temperley, D.(2008)。A Probabilistic Model of Melody Perception。Cognitive Science,32,418-444。
20.
Thompson, S. P.、Newport, E. L.(2007)。Statistical Learning of Syntax: The Role of Transitional Probability。Language Learning and Development,3,1-42。
21.
Weiss, D. J.、Newport, E. L.(2006)。Mechanisms Underlying Language Acquisition: Benefits from a Comparative Approach。Infancy,9,235-251。
22.
van Leeuwen, C.(2007)。What Needs to Emerge to Make You Conscious?。Journal of Consciousness Studies,14(1/2),115-136。
23.
Chomsky, Noam(2005)。Three factors in language design。Linguistic Inquiry,36(1),1-22。
24.
Cosmides, Leda(1989)。The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task。Cognition,31(3),187-276。
25.
Kurzban, Robert、Barrett, H. Clark(2006)。Modularity in Cognition: Framing the Debate。Psychological Review,113(3),628-647。
會議論文
1.
Taraborelli, D.(200309)。“What Is a ‘Feature’? A Meta-Analysis of Selection Criteria for Salient Visual Properties。6th European Conference on Visual Perception。Paris, France:ECVP。
圖書
1.
Carruthers, Peter(2006)。The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
2.
Chomsky, N.(1965)。Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought。Lanham, Maryland:University Press of America。
3.
Fodor, A. J.(2001)。The Mind Doesn t Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.。
4.
Fodor, Jerry A.(2008)。LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited。Oxford University Press。
5.
Thibodeau, G. A.、Patton, K. T.(2007)。Anatomy and Physiology。Missouri:St Louis, Elsevier Mosby。
6.
Watson, R.(2005)。Anatomy and Physiology for Nurses。Edinburgh:Bailliere Tindall。
7.
Squire, L. R.、Kandel, E. R.(1999)。Memory: From Mind to Molecules。New York:Scientific American Library。
8.
Fodor, Jerry A.(1983)。The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。
9.
Pinker, Steven(1994)。The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language。New York:HarperCollins。
10.
Stanovich, K. E.(1999)。Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
圖書論文
1.
Bertolotti, T.、Magnani, L.(2010)。The Role of Agency Detection in the Invention of Supernatural Beings。Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology: Abduction, Logic, and Computational Discovery。Berlin, Heidelbeig:Springer。
2.
Carruthers, P.(2003)。Moderately Massive Modularity。Mind and Persons。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
3.
Carruthers, P.(2004)。Simple Heuristics Meet Massively Modularity.。The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
4.
Carruthers, P.(2005)。Distinctively Human Thinking: Modular Precursors and Components。The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents: Structure and Contents。Oxford:Oxford University Press.。
5.
Carruthers, P.(2006)。Why Pretend?。The Architecture of the Imagination。Oxford:Oxford University Press.。
6.
Mercier, H.、Sperber, D.(2009)。Intuitive and Reflective Inferences。In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond。Oxford:Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0007。
7.
Samuels, R.(2006)。Is the Human Mind Massively Modular。Contemporary Debate in Cognitive Science。Malden MA:Blackwell Publishing。
8.
Sperber, D.(2002)。In Defense of Massive Modularity。Language, Brain and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler。Mass:MIT Press。
9.
Cosmides, Leda、Tooby, John(2005)。Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology。The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology。New Jersey。
10.
Kurzban, R.、Aktipis, A.(2006)。Modular Minds, Multiple Motives。Evolution and Social Psychology。New York:Psychology Press。
11.
Chomsky, Noam(1981)。Knowledge of Language: Its Elements and Origins。The Psychological Mechanisms of Language。Cambridge, England:The Royal Society and The British Academy。
12.
Samuels, Richard(2009)。The Magical Number Two, Plus or Minus: Dual Process Theory as a Theory of Cognitive Kinds。Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
13.
Sperber, Dan(1994)。The Modularity of Thought and the Epidemiology of Representation。Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture。Cambridge。
14.
Tooby, John、Cosmides, Leda(1992)。The Psychological Foundations of Culture。The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture。New York:Oxford University Press。
15.
Carruthers, Peter(2004)。Is the Mind a System of Modules Shaped by Natural Selection?。Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science。Oxford。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
近代佛教史學研究的背景和焦點--以圍繞《四十二章經》的論爭為例
2.
儒道天人思想發展脈絡下的繼承及超越--涵靜老人「昊天虛無大道自然無為心法」初探
3.
化身與道統:教派宗教中祖師源流的三教合一問題
4.
Canon Made and Canon Revealed: An Interpretation of Luo Qing's 羅清 Wubu liuce 五部六冊
5.
孔子「一以貫之」工夫之現代詮釋
6.
章學誠道論及其學風
7.
羅逖的詮釋學概念及其困境:從高達美的觀點
8.
論朱熹對程頤易學的批評
9.
王船山莊學中「相天」說的倫理意義
10.
Plato's Treatment of Desire and Eryximachus' Medicine in the Symposium
11.
亞理斯多德對柏拉圖靈魂劃分之批判
12.
語言之道:從德勒茲的語言哲學到莊子的「天籟」
13.
論《存有與時間》的良知現象
14.
從Prof. Jana S. Rošker的觀點檢視先秦認知思想
15.
The Semantic Theory and the Availability Principle
QR Code