:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:訓練特殊教育教師二種刺激偏好評量之成效研究
書刊名:特殊教育學報
作者:鍾儀潔 引用關係鳳華
作者(外文):Chung, Yi-chiehFeng, Hua
出版日期:2014
卷期:40
頁次:頁93-112
主題關鍵詞:教師訓練刺激偏好評量類化Teacher trainingStimulus preference assessmentGeneralization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:3
本研究目的為評鑑四名特殊教育教師接受兩種刺激偏好評量訓練後,在使用兩種偏好評量之成效。訓練方式包含角色扮演、回饋教學。研究參與者為四名南部地區一所特教學校之特殊教育教師。四名特殊教育教師被隨機分派到不同訓練組別。第一組先接受配對刺激偏好評量的訓練,再進行多刺激呈現不替補選取物的偏好評量訓練;另一組則先接受多刺激呈現不替補選取物評量的教導,再進行配對刺激偏好評量訓練。每一位受訓教師會各自對該校兩名特教學生使用習得的刺激偏好評量。研究設計採用多元素探測實驗設計。結果顯示四名特教教師都能有效執行兩種偏好評量,正確率達85%-100%。社會效度亦顯示四名教師對此訓練的高度滿意,討論及建議則提供相關單位參考。
This study evaluated the effects of role play and feedback on training four Taiwanese special education teachers to conduct two commonly used preference assessments. The four teachers were randomly assigned to two groups. One group was first taught to conduct paired-stimulus (PS) preference assessment, while the other group was first taught to conduct multiple-stimulus-without-replacement (MSWO) preference assessment. Then they would teach to conduct the other preference assessment. Each trainee performed learned skilled with two students. One is for training effect, and the other student is for generalization check. The results suggested that all trainees correctly implemented the procedures with 85-100% accuracy across subjects and assessments. Social validity data also showed favor results to support the effect of this study.
期刊論文
1.Roscoe, E. M.、Fisher, W. W.(2008)。Evaluation of an efficient method for training staff to implement stimulus preference assessments。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,41,249-254。  new window
2.Roscoe, E. M.、Fisher, W. W.、Glover, A. C.、Volkert, V. M.(2006)。Evaluating the relative effects of feedback and contingent money for staff training of stimulus preference assessments。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,39,63-77。  new window
3.Ciccone, F. J.、Graff, R. B.、Ahearn, W. H.(2007)。Long-term stability of edible preferences in individuals with developmental disabilities。Behavioral Interventions,22,223-228。  new window
4.Fisher, W. W.、Piazza, C. C.、Bowman, L. G.、Hagopian, L. P.、Owens, J. C.、Slevin, I.(1992)。A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,25,491-498。  new window
5.Hanley, G. P.、Iwata, B. A.、Roscoe, E. M.(2006)。Some determinants of changes in preference over time。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,39,189-202。  new window
6.Iwata, B. A.、Wallace, M. D.、Kahng, S. W.、Lindberg, J. S.、Roscoe, E. M.、Conners, J.、Worsdell, A. S.(2000)。Skill acquisition in the implementation of functional analysis methodology。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,33,181-194。  new window
7.Ringdahl, J. E.、Vollmer, T. R.、Marcus, B. A.、Sloane, H. S.(1997)。An analogue evaluation of environmental enrichment: The role of stimulus preference。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,30,203-216。  new window
8.Lavie, T.、Sturmey, P.(2002)。Training staff to conduct a paired-stimulus preference assessment。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,35(2),209-211。  new window
9.Wolf, M. M.(1978)。Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,11(2),203-214。  new window
10.Deleon, I. G.、Iwata, B. A.(1996)。Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,29(4),519-533。  new window
圖書
1.Cooper, J. O.、Heron, T. E.、Heward, W. L.(2007)。Applied behavior analysis。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education, Inc.。  new window
2.Cooper, J. O.、Heron, T. E.、Heward, W. L.、鳳華、鈕文英、彭雅真、夏瑞璘、張證恩、蔡淑珍、柯淑惠、陳輝鴻、陳志良、陳以昌、李宜珊、陳奕廷、林示安、王麗淳、劉郁君、林秀奇、莊玉玲、羅敏馨、許鈺珣、郭淑芬、杜維鎮(2012)。應用行為分析。學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Michael, J.(2007)。Motivating operations。Applied behavior analysis。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Prentice Hall。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE