資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.134.105.135)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
我國研究生之研究不當行為的調查研究
書刊名:
教育學誌
作者:
尹玫君
作者(外文):
Yin, Mei-chun
出版日期:
2015
卷期:
34
頁次:
頁81-119
主題關鍵詞:
研究不當行為
;
學術研究倫理
;
Research misconduct
;
Academic research ethics
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:63
本研究目的在瞭解研究生對各項研究不當行為嚴重性的看法及他們的研究不當行為,並探討他們認為造成這些研究不當行為的可能原因。本研究以調查方式,359 位研究生為調查對象,透過研究者自編的「研究不當行為調查問卷」,瞭解研究生對各項研究不當行為嚴重性的看法及自我評估他們的研究不當行為,及他們認為造成這些研究不當行為的可能原因。本研究獲致結論如下:一、有八成以上的研究生認為在研究過程中,如「捏造研究結果數據資料」、「捏造受試對象、研究程序或相關資料」、「在簡歷中捏造自己發表的論文或研討會著作」和「為了符合研究假設或理論依據,而去修改數據或相關資訊」等,是較嚴重的研究不當行為。二、約有兩到三成的研究生自己評估認為他們曾偶而會有研究不當行為,如「將研究方法修改成比實際執行情形還嚴謹」、「僅挑選符合研究假設的部分統計數據資料」和「沒有清楚呈現可以協助其他人從事類似研究時所需的資訊(如:相關文獻、研究方法、受試者等)」。三、取得學位的壓力、撰寫論文時間的壓力和論文的發表是獲得學位的必要條件,這三項是研究生認為最可能造成研究不當行為發生的原因。
以文找文
The purposes of this study is aim to understand graduate students' attitudes towards research misconduct, their inappropriate behaviors and the reasons behind that misconduct. By using 'research misconduct questionnaire, the researcher survey 359 graduate students, to understand their attitudes towards research misconduct, their inappropriate behaviors and the reasons behind that misconduct. The research results are as following: 1. Over 80% graduate students considered 'fabricate research data', 'fabricate research subjects, procedures or other information', 'fabricate published paper in resume' and 'modify data or relevant information to support predetermined hypothesis or theory' are most serious research misconduct behaviors. 2. About 20% to 30% graduate students admitted themselves that on rare occasions have some research misconduct behaviors, such as : 'modify methodological terms appear more rigorous than it in fact', 'select certain statistical data in preference to others only because they confirm a research hypothesis', and 'fail to mention information likely to help other researchers pursuing the same type of research'. 3. The pressure of obtaining a degree, the time pressure of writing thesis and the pressure of publishing paper were considered by graduate students as top three reasons of research misconduct.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Dick, M.、Sheard, J.、Markham, S.(2003)。Investigating difference in cheating behaviors of IT undergraduate and graduate students: The maturity and motivation factors。Higher Education Research and Development,22(1),91-108。
2.
李世光(2011)。學術研究與道德責任:進入學術領域的第一課。牛頓蘋果樹月刊。
延伸查詢
3.
Barrett, K. A.、Funk, C. L.、Macrina, F. L.(2005)。Awareness of publication guidelines and the responsible conduct of research。Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance,12,193-206。
4.
Brown, S.、Kalichman, M. W.(1998)。Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences。Science & Engineering Ethics,4,487-498。
5.
Christensen, Hughes J. M.、McCabe, D. L.(2006)。Academic misconduct within higher education in Canada。Canadian Journal of Higher Education,36(2),1-21。
6.
Cossette, R(2004)。Research Integrity: An exploratory survey of administrative science faculties。Journal of Business Ethics,49,213-234。
7.
Davis, M. S.(2003)。The role of culture in research misconduct。Accountability in Research,10(3),189-201。
8.
Davis, M. S.、Riske-Morris, M.、Diaz, S. R.(2007)。Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files。Sci Eng Ethics,13,395-414。
9.
Farthing, M. J. G.(2000)。Research misconduct: diagnosis, treatment and prevention。British Journal of Surgery,87,1605-1609。
10.
Fanelli, D.(2009)。How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data。PLoS One,4,5738。
11.
Fisher, C. B.、Fried, A. L.、Feldman, L. G.(2009)。Graduate socialization in the responsible conduct of research: A national survey on the research ethics training experiences of psychology doctoral students。Ethics & Behavior,19(6),496-518。
12.
Flanagin, A.、Carey, L. A.、Fontanarosa, P. B.、Phillips, S. G.、Pace, B. P.、Lundberg, G. D.、Rennie, D.(1998)。Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals。The Journal of the American Medical Association,280(3),222-224。
13.
Gibelman, M.、Gelman, S. R.(2001)。Learning from the mistakes of others: A look at scientific misconduct in research。Journal of Social Work Education,37(2),241-254。
14.
Hard, S. F.、Conway, J. M.、Moran, A. C.(2006)。Faculty and college student beliefs about the frequency of student academic misconduct。The Journal of Higher Education,77(6),1058-1080。
15.
Homer, J.、Minifie, F. D.(2011)。Research ethics III: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct。Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,54,346-362。
16.
Jendrek, M. P.(1992)。Students, reactions to academic dishonesty。Journal of College Student Development,33,260-273。
17.
Jones, D. L. R.(2011)。Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating。Business Communication Quarterly,74(2),141-150。
18.
Kimberly, E.、Doris, S. H.(2007)。The plague of plagiarism and academic dishonest。Searcher,15(6),23-26。
19.
Rabi, S. M.、Patton, L. R.、Fjortoft, N.、Zgarrick, D. P.(2006)。Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students。American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,70(4),1-8。
20.
Selwyn, N.(2008)。Not necessarily a bad thing. A study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,33(5),465-479。
21.
Steen, R. G.(2011)。Retractions in the scientific literature: Do authors deliberately commit research fraud?。Journal of Med Ethics,37,113-117。
22.
Steneck, N. H.(2006)。Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions。Science and Engineering Ethics,12(1),53-74。
23.
Titus, S. L.、Wells, J. A.、Rhoades, L. J.(2008)。Repairing research integrity。Nature,453,980-982。
24.
Wager, E.(2012)。Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct?。Anaesthesia,67,455-473。
25.
Yang, S. C.(2012)。Attitudes and Behaviors Related to Academic Dishonesty: A Survey of Taiwanese Graduate Students。Ethics & Behavior,22(3),218-237。
26.
Davis, S. F.、Grover, C. A.、Becker, A. H.、McGregor, L. N.(1992)。Academic Dishonesty: Prevalence, Determinants, Techniques, and Punishments。Teaching of Psychology,19(1),16-20。
27.
McCabe, D. L.、Trevino, L. K.(1993)。Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences。The Journal of Higher Education,64(5),522-538。
研究報告
1.
教育部(2015)。教育統計(103年版)。
延伸查詢
2.
湯德宗、謝銘洋、蔡明誠、黃銘傑、陳淳文、廖元豪(2007)。學術倫理規範之研究 (計畫編號:NSC94-2420-H001-022)。
延伸查詢
3.
Carroll, J. & Appleton, I.(2001)。Plagiarism a good practice guide。
4.
iThenticate(2012)。True costs of research misconduct: 2012 iThenticate Report。
學位論文
1.
Walton, C. L. T.(2010)。An investigation of academic dishonesty among undergraduates at Kansas state university(博士論文)。Kansas state university,Manhattan, Kansas。
圖書
1.
Decoo, W.(2002)。Crisis on campus: Confronting academic misconduct。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。
其他
1.
方玉東,陳越(2013)。科研不端行爲:概念、類型與治理,http://big5.qstheory.cn/kj/yjsk/201308/t20130812_258886.htm。
延伸查詢
2.
科技部(2012)。學術倫理常見態樣說明,http://AveblediLtw/~rdsotc/news/explor.php?which=16。
延伸查詢
3.
科技部(2013)。學術倫理案件處理及審議要點,http://law.nsc.gov.tw/NewsContent.aspx?id=177。
延伸查詢
4.
iThenticate(2012)。Survey highlights: Scholarly plagiarism,http://www.ithenticate.com。
5.
Office of Research Integrity(2000)。Final PHS policy for instruction in the responsible conduct of research,http://www.ori.dhhsgov/policies/RCR_Policy.shtml。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
影響我國研究生不當研究行為的因素探討
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
課程實驗與教學改革
2.
論遺傳資源與傳統知識之取得與惠益分享原則
3.
程式抄襲源頭偵測之研究
4.
學術寫作之新倫理議題「自我抄襲」:內涵演進、真實案例、現行規範與預防之道
5.
學士學位論文重復率檢測及其規範化提升策略探討
6.
學術失範、不端檢測軟件的功能、局限與對策--以學術研究規範為視角
7.
雙重障礙 : 從公共知識份子和女性大學教師的角色談起
8.
[各國高等教育制度]日本
9.
學校經營管理策略 : 大學經費分配、募款與行銷
10.
誰捉弄了臺灣教改?
11.
科學研究作偽之資訊倫理問題研究
12.
電腦仿冒與抄襲之法律問題
13.
作者、編者、剽竊者:從《晰微補化全書》看醫書的抄輯與作者身分
14.
中西學術書寫倫理中“抄襲”的演化
15.
臺灣研究人員學術倫理概念調查研究之初探:以科技部公布之學術抄襲、未適當引註及自我抄襲概念為例
QR Code