:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:理性與感性的共存:談藝術創作的評量規準
書刊名:教育研究月刊
作者:周明武
作者(外文):Chou, Ming-wu
出版日期:2016
卷期:261
頁次:頁100-117
主題關鍵詞:同儕評量評量規準藝術創作Peer assessmentAssessment rubricArt creation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:32
在本研究中,研究者轉化了一個視覺藝術的課程,以此為工具,透過教學行動帶領國小四年級一個班的學生(男生有13人,女生有13人)去探討評量規準在藝術創作上的實施情況與結果。研究發現,評量規準能促使教師和學生對於自己的角色更投入,而能創造教學的「品質」;但若能適時搭配或更換其他評量方式,則更能使師生受益。
In this study, the researcher transformed a visual art curriculum as a tool to lead a class of fourth grade students (13 boys and 13 girls) to explore the influence of assessment rubric on the implementation and outcome of artistic creation. The results were assessment rubric can promote teachers and students to devote more efforts into their roles, so “teaching quality” can be created. However, it enables teachers and students to benefit more if other assessment methods can be collocated and replaced at the right moment.
期刊論文
1.Bensur, B. J.(2002)。Association frustrated voices of art assessment。Art Education,55(6),18-23。  new window
2.Brewer, T. M.(2008)。Developing a bundled visual arts assessment model。Visual Arts Research,34(1),63-74。  new window
3.Clark, I.(2008)。Assessment is for learning: Formative assessment and positive learning interactions。Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy,2(1),1-16。  new window
4.Connelly, M.(2007)。The art of rubrics: Painting by numbers。Teaching Artist Journal,5(4),279-288。  new window
5.Dorn, C. M.(2002)。The teacher as stakeholder in student art assessment and art program。Art Education,55(4),40-45。  new window
6.Gruber, D. D.(2008)。Measuring student learning in art education。Art Education,61(5),40-45。  new window
7.Hamblen, K. A.(1988)。If it is to be tested, it will be taught: A rationale worthy of examination。Art Education,41(5),59-62。  new window
8.Huffman, E. S.(1998)。Authentic rubrics。Art Education,51(1),64-68。  new window
9.Kinne, L. J.、Hasenbank, J. F.、Coffey, D.(2014)。Are we there yet? Using rubrics to support progress toward profi ciency and model formative assessment。AILACTE Journal,11(1),109-128。  new window
10.Kohn, A.(2006)。The trouble with rubrics。English Journal,95(4),12-15。  new window
11.McCollister, S.(2002)。Association developing criteria rubrics in the art classroom。Art Education,55(4),46-52。  new window
12.Panadero, E.、Jonsson, A.(2013)。The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review。Educational Research Review,9,129-144。  new window
13.Parsons, M. J.(2004)。Assessment and art marking: The cases of Amy, Bo and Chi。The International Journal of Arts Education,2(4),40-49。  new window
14.Roberts, T.(2005)。Association teaching real art making。Art Education,58(2),40-45。  new window
15.Willis, S.(2002)。What art educator value in artwork。Visual Arts Research,28(1),61-67。  new window
16.Wolf, K.、Connelly, M.、Komara, A.(2008)。A tale of two rubrics: Improving teaching and learning across the content areas through assessment。Journal of Effective Teaching,8(1),21-32。  new window
17.楊馥如(20090700)。從主觀到客觀--視覺藝術如何進行評量。美育,170,88-96。  延伸查詢new window
18.Gude, Olivia(2008)。Aesthetics making meaning。Studies in Art Education,50(1),98-103。  new window
圖書
1.劉思量(1989)。藝術與創造。臺北:藝術家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Beattie, D. K.(1997)。Assessment in Art Education。Worcester, MA:Davis Publication, Inc。  new window
3.胡寶林(1986)。繪畫與視覺想像力。臺北:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Freedman, Kerr(2003)。Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics and the social life of art。New York, NY:Teachers College, Columbia Univisity。  new window
5.黃壬來(1993)。國小美勞科教學研究。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE