:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:跨越主觀:網路同儕互評應用於大學藝術設計課堂之實踐研究
書刊名:設計學報
作者:劉光夏
作者(外文):Liu, Kuang-hsia
出版日期:2021
卷期:26:2
頁次:頁69-92
主題關鍵詞:網路同儕互評藝術設計課堂評量規準Web-based peer assessmentArt and design coursesScoring rubrics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:81
  • 點閱點閱:6
期刊論文
1.林珊如、劉旨峰、袁賢銘(20010900)。以大學生學習動機與學習策略預測網路同儕互評之學習成就。教學科技與媒體,57,2-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林玫君(20100600)。表演藝術評分規範之建立--以小學低年級「戲劇創作能力之應用」為例。當代教育研究,18(2),113-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.韋伊珊(2004)。國小兒童電腦繪圖學習與作品評量研究。數位藝術教育網路期刊,6。  延伸查詢new window
4.沈慶珩、黃信義(20060300)。網路同儕互評在Moodle系統上的應用。教育資料與圖書館學,43(3),267-284。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Fallows, S.、Chandramohan, B.(2001)。Multiple approaches to assessment: Reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment。Teaching in Higher Education,6(2),229-246。  new window
6.Tseng, S. C.、Tsai, C. C.(2010)。Taiwan college students' self-efficacy and motivation of learning in online peer assessment environments。The Internet and Higher Education,13(3),164-169。  new window
7.Falchikov, Nancy(1995)。Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment。Innovations in Education & Training International,32(2),175-187。  new window
8.Gatfield, T.(1999)。Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,24(4),365-377。  new window
9.Hanrahan, S. J.、Isaacs, G.(2001)。Assessing self-and peer-assessment: The students' views。Higher Education Research & Development,20(1),53-70。  new window
10.Sivan, A.(2000)。The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach。Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,7(2),193-213。  new window
11.Topping, K. J.(2005)。Trends in peer learning。Educational Psychology,25(6),631-645。  new window
12.Searby, M.、Ewers, T.(1997)。An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in the school of music, Kingston University。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,22(4),371-384。  new window
13.史美瑤(20121100)。提升學生學習成效:評估表格(Rubrics)的設計與運用。評鑑雙月刊,40,39-41。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bensur, B. J.(2002)。Association frustrated voices of art assessment。Art Education,55(6),18-23。  new window
15.Parsons, M. J.(2004)。Assessment and art marking: The cases of Amy, Bo and Chi。The International Journal of Arts Education,2(4),40-49。  new window
16.Willis, S.(2002)。What art educator value in artwork。Visual Arts Research,28(1),61-67。  new window
17.楊馥如(20090700)。從主觀到客觀--視覺藝術如何進行評量。美育,170,88-96。  延伸查詢new window
18.于富雲、鄭守杰(20040300)。網路同儕互評與標準建構歷程對國小學生後設認知影響的實證性研究。國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類,17(1),197-225。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.于富雲、鄭守杰、杜明璋、陳德懷(20031000)。網路同儕互評與評量標準來源對批判思考能力之影響。南師學報. 教育類,37(2),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.黃志雄(20170400)。翻轉教室模式在大學課程中的實踐與反思。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,10(1),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Liu, X. Y.、Li, L.(2014)。Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,39(3),275-292。  new window
22.Çevik, Y. D.、Haşlaman, T.、Çelik, S.(2015)。The effect of peer assessment on problem solving skills of prospective teachers supported by online learning activities。Studies in Educational Evaluation,44,23-35。  new window
23.Lai, C.-Y.(2016)。Training nursing students' communication skills with online video peer assessment。Computers & Education,97,21-30。  new window
24.Tenório, T.、Bittencourt, I. I.、Isotani, S.、Silva, A. P.(2016)。Does peer assessment in on-line learning environments work? A systematic review of the literature。Computers in Human Behavior,64,94-107。  new window
25.張基成、吳明芳(20110900)。網路化檔案評量環境下教學者評、學生自評與同儕互評之信效度比較。教育資料與圖書館學,49(1),135-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.陳淳迪、黃佳音、翁註重(20120500)。工業設計專案學習的評量項目意涵及意涵說明:教師觀點。藝術教育研究,23,71-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Elliott, John(1987)。Educational theory, practical philosophy and action research。British Journal of Educational Studies,35(2),149-169。  new window
28.Lai, Chiu-Lin、Hwang, Gwo-Jen(2015)。An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices。Computers & Education,85,149-159。  new window
29.Topping, K. J.(1998)。Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities。Review of Educational Research,68(3),249-276。  new window
30.Topping, K. J.、Ehly, S. W.(2001)。Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation。Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,12(2),113-132。  new window
31.嚴貞、孫志誠(20080400)。設計類師生對實作評量的認知與評量規準之研究。科技學刊. 人文社會類,17(1),41-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.盧俊宏、蔡須全(20040500)。室內設計立體電腦繪圖教學作品評量之研究。美育,139,70-81。  延伸查詢new window
33.李坤崇(20120200)。實作評量的編製步驟及實例。教育研究月刊,214,92-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.林鳳雯、崔夢萍(20110600)。網路摘要策略教學與同儕互評對國小六年級學童學習成效之研究。國民教育,51(5),25-34。  延伸查詢new window
35.Gruber, D. D.(2008)。Measuring students learning in art education。Art Education,61(5),40-45。  new window
36.Llado, A. P.、Soley, L. F.、Sansbello, R. M. F.、Pujolras, G. A.、Planella, J. P.、Roura-Pascual, N.(2014)。Student perceptions of peer assessment: An interdisciplinary study。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,39(5),592-610。  new window
37.Maas, M. J. M.、Sluijsmans, D. M. A.、Van der Wees, P. J.、Heerkens, Y. F.、Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G.、Van der Vleuten, C. P. M.(2014)。Why peer assessment helps to improve clinical performance in undergraduate physical therapy education: A mixed methods design。BMC Medical Education,14(1)。  new window
38.周明武(20160100)。理性與感性的共存:談藝術創作的評量規準。教育研究月刊,261,100-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.孫志誠(20131100)。設計作品評量方式與規準在視覺傳達設計類競賽評審之應用。教育研究月刊,235,85-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.張家慧、蔡銘修(20180800)。淺談同儕作業互評與實施建議。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(8),212-218。  延伸查詢new window
41.鄭銘雄、張菽萱、李志民、楊禮仁(2008)。建構輔助專題式學習之網路同儕互評系統與實施成效之研究--以高職「數位邏輯實習」。技術及職業教育學報,2(2),1-27。  延伸查詢new window
42.劉仲嚴(20100500)。藝術本位研究方法論與方法的議題和前景。藝術教育研究,19,1-23+25-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳振宏(2011)。線上教師評量與同儕互評對大學生攝影課程作品表現之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋長岳(2011)。應用ANP法於視覺傳達設計教育之作品評量研究(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Rogers, P. L.(1997)。Adoption of computer-based technologies among art Educators: Implications for instructional design in art education(博士論文)。University of Minnesota。  new window
4.王馨儀(2016)。建立同儕互評之評分規準應用於「2D動畫製作」線上課程之研究(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃乙珊(2015)。網路同儕互評對大學生學習動機、自我效能與學習成效之探究--以「影像繪圖設計」課程為例(碩士論文)。國立屏東科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭純如(2009)。網路同儕互評應用於藝術設計領域之研究--以「電腦動畫」課程為例(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳明清(2008)。教育研究--基本觀念與方法之分析。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Linn, R. L.、Miller, M. D.(2005)。Measurement and assessment in teaching。Prentice Hall。  new window
3.McNiff, Jean(1995)。Action Research: Principles and Practice。London:Routledge。  new window
4.Wiggins, G.(1998)。Educative Assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance。Jossey-Bass。  new window
5.Boud, D.、Falchikov, N.(2007)。Rethinking assessment in higher education。London:Kogan Page。  new window
6.Eisner, E. W.(1972)。Educating Artistic Vision。New York:The Macmillan Company。  new window
7.賴建都(2002)。臺灣設計教育思潮與演進。臺北:龍溪。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Carr, W.、Kemmis, S.(1986)。Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research。Routledge Falmer。  new window
9.Mayer, R. E.(2005)。The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning。Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Armstrong, Carmen L.(1994)。Designing Assessment in Art。Reston, VA:The National Art Education Association。  new window
11.Bersin, Josh(2004)。The blended learning book: best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned。Pfeiffer。  new window
12.劉光夏(2017)。數位影像創作教學之行動研究:一位藝術設計教師應用磨課師之實踐。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
13.Lawson, B.(1990)。How designers think: The design process demystified。Architectural Press。  new window
14.Stiggins, R. J.、Chappuis, J.(2016)。An introduction to student-involved assessment for learning。Pearson。  new window
15.蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。五南。  延伸查詢new window
16.余民寧(2011)。教育測驗與評量:成就測驗與教學評量。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳朝平(2002)。視覺藝術教學研究。藝術與人文教育。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
2.張麗麗(2002)。藝術與人文學習領域的教學評量。藝術與人文教育。台北:桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉光夏(2016)。MOOC融入新世代藝術教學之實踐研究:以「數位影像創作」課程為例。面對新世代的課程實踐。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kemmis, Stephen、McTaggart, Robin(2005)。Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere。The SAGE handbook of qualitative research。Sage。  new window
5.呂燕卿(1996)。美勞科教學評量及作品評量。兒童美術教育理論與實務探討。臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE