:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:陶淵明〈閑情賦〉寄託之意義商榷
書刊名:嶺東通識教育研究學刊
作者:林佳慧
作者(外文):Lin, Chia-hui
出版日期:2016
卷期:6:4
頁次:頁65-87
主題關鍵詞:閑情賦愛情比興寄託知音理想世界Shen-Chin FuLoveBi-sinSuggestionConfidantsUtopia
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:70
陶淵明〈閑情賦〉之主旨與寫作動機歷來聚訟紛紛,昭明太子蕭統在《陶淵明集 ‧序》認為〈閑情賦〉乃陶淵明白璧之瑕;蘇東坡則一反「白璧微瑕」之論,而主張與《國風》、屈、宋無異。議者延續蕭統與東坡,分別有「愛情說」與「比興說」兩造爭論,各言之有理,相持不下。本文則試梳理二者之內涵脈絡,歸結廣義「寄託」之可能性,作淵明〈閑情〉,情歸何處之探討。以為「愛情說」與「比興說」,合之則兩美,今人觀〈閑情賦〉,無須視淵明為完人,而不許淵明有愛情之遐思;也不必視淵明必有凡情,而反對〈閑情賦〉可能有理想性的寄託―不論是理想政治的擁抱,或是知音的渴求。讓「愛情說」與「比興說」兩造並存於廣義「寄託說」之下,正好構成陶淵明情感之豐富與完整。
The theme and writing motivation of Tao, Yuan -ming (Shen-Chin Fu) have been studied for years, making various conclusions. In the preface of Tao Yaun-ming collection, Hsiao Tong, the Zhao -Ming crown prince, thinks that this work is the flaw of Tao. However, Su, Dong -pao objects Hsiao’s point, and claims that he agrees with that of (Guo Feng), Qu and Song. The author will describe Hisao and Don-pao’s arguments, which are love-related and bi, sin-related respectively, believing that they all get their points and can not tell which one is better and tries to recount the internal meanings of the contradiction, concluding that it is possible to generalize suggestion, on which this article is based to categorize Tao (Shen-Chin). The writer thinks that it will be perfect if two points converge. Nowadays, when reading (Shen -Chin Fu), readers don’t have to consider that Yuan-ming is a man without defects and not allow him to hold reverie about love. Also, they don ’t have to think that he must have feelings and disapprove that it may suggest some ideasー whether it is implying the ideal politics or eager to looking for confidants. It is making the controversy co -exist under the generalized suggestion that composes the abundance and integrity of Tao, Yuan-ming’s emotions.
期刊論文
1.袁行霈(1992)。陶淵明的《閑情賦》與辭賦中的愛情閑情主題。北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版),1992(5)。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂凌(2012)。從《閒情賦》看楚辭對陶淵明的影響。文史月刊。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.蘇珊玉(2014)。王國維「歐穆亞」說之於陶詩審美的可然性:管窺陶淵明之〈責子〉詩與〈閒情賦〉。第四屆文學藝術與創意研發學術研討會,(會議日期: 2014年11月)。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.俞正燮(1985)。癸巳存稿。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉熙載(1964)。藝概。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.王國維、徐調孚(2007)。校注人間詞話。頂淵文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃明誠(2005)。魏晉風流的藝術精神--才性、情感與玄心。臺北:國立歷史博物館。  延伸查詢new window
5.王應麟(1978)。困學紀聞。臺北:中國子學名著集成編印基金會。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱熹、黎靖德(1986)。朱子語類。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.弘法大師(1976)。文鏡秘府論。臺北市:河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.鍾優民(1981)。陶淵明論集。長沙:湖南人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.龔自珍(1975)。龔定盦全集。臺北:河洛。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊家駱(1970)。陶淵明詩文彙評。臺北:台灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.屈原、洪興祖(1999)。楚辭補注。臺北:大安出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.魯迅(1990)。且介亭雜文二集「題未定」草。臺北:風雲時代。  延伸查詢new window
13.魯迅、林毓生、李歐梵(1989)。魯迅全集。臺北:唐山。  延伸查詢new window
14.王國維、謝維揚、房鑫亮(2009)。王國維全集。杭州:浙江教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.周振甫(2006)。陶淵明和他的詩賦。南京:江蘇教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.謝雲飛(1978)。文學與音律。台北:東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.王國維、謝維揚、房鑫亮(2009)。王國維全集。廣州:廣東教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.錢鍾書(1990)。管錐篇。書林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.蘇軾(1986)。蘇東坡全集。中國書店。  延伸查詢new window
20.陶淵明、袁行霈(2003)。陶淵明集箋注。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE