臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：急診檢傷護理人員間使用E化五級檢傷分類系統級數判斷一致性及影響因素之探討
書刊名：長庚護理
作者：張文／韓晶彥 引用關係／陳麗琴／陳雅欣／羅美怡／劉雪娥
作者(外文)：Chang, Wen／Han, Chin-yen／Chen, Li-chin／Chen, Yea-shin／Luo, Mei-yi／Liu, Hsueh-erh
出版日期：2017
卷期：28:1=97
頁次：頁1-11
主題關鍵詞：急診；五級檢傷分類；電腦化系統；檢傷護理師；一致性；Emergency department；The five-level triage；Electronic triage system；Triage nurses；Agreement
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:20
背景／目的：自2010年1月1日始全國各急診室統一使用新建構的五級檢傷分類電腦化系統進行病人檢傷分類。本研究目的在探討急診檢傷護理師執行E化五級檢傷分類系統的分級一致性及其影響因素。研究方法：採前瞻性、橫斷式研究法，以收集1位標竿護理師與14位急診檢傷護理師個別使用E化五級檢傷分類系統，同步進行病人檢傷分類的結果。自2012年8月至2013年7月，共收集239位有效樣本。研究結果：結果發現檢傷護理師與標竿護理師間的一致性“幾乎完全吻合”(weighted kappa= .886)，整體一致性為93.72%。檢傷低估有5.43%，檢傷高估為0.84%。以護理職級來看，一致性比率最高為N4（95.10%）。結論：研究結果顯示急診檢傷護理師使用E化五級檢傷分類系統執行檢傷分類的結果是可信的。工作年資與護理專業進階能力可作為檢傷一致性因素之考量，期望本研究結果可供各醫療院所訓練檢傷護理師課程之參考。
Background/Purpose: The five-level electronic triage system(Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale, TTAS) was implemented over the emergency departments (ED) in Taiwan on January 1, 2010. The purpose of this study was to explore the agreement and affecting factors of five-level triage system among the ED triage nurses. Methods: This study was a prospective design. Data were collected by using one trained research nurse with fourteen ED triage nurses implementing the TTAS simultaneously to determine the triage level in ED patients. From August 2012 to July 2013, a total of 239 effective examples of ED patients were evaluated. Results: The results found that the inter-observer agreement was 93.72% with a weighted kappa of .886 of triage level among the ED triage nurses and the benchmark nurse. The under-triage was 5.43% and over-triage was 0.84%. The highest agreement ratio (95.10%) is the N4 of nursing clinical ladder. Conclusions: The results from this study indicated that the TTAS used by ED triage nurses was reliable. Years of clinical working experience and nursing clinical ladder were the affecting factors of the ED triage nurses' agreement. The results of this study could serve as a reference for designing training courses for triage nurses.
期刊論文
1.江錦玲、蔡芸芳(19990900)。急診檢傷護理人員與醫師在檢傷分類級數判斷上的一致性之探討。慈濟醫學，11(3)，255-262。  延伸查詢new window
2.林增記(2010)。急診掛號不再是先到先看--五級檢傷分類判別先後順序。高醫醫訊，30(7)，5。  延伸查詢new window
3.邱曉彥、陳麗琴、邱艶芬(20101200)。E化五級檢傷分類系統教育訓練對檢傷護理人員之影響。長庚護理，21(4)=72，430-441。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Alquraini, M.、Awad, E.、Hijazi, R.(2015)。Reliability of Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) in Saudi Arabia。International Journal of Emergency Medicine，8(1)，1-4。  new window
5.Becker, J.、Lopes, M.、Pinto, M.、Campanharo, C.、Barbosa, D.、Batista, R.(2015)。Triage at the emergency department: Association between triage levels and patient outcome。Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP，49(5)，779-785。  new window
6.Chang, W.、Liu, H. E.、Goopy, S.、Chen L. C.、Chen, H. J.、Han, C. Y.(2017)。Using the five-level Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale computerized system: factors in decision making by emergency department triage nurses。Clinical Nursing Research，26(5)，651-666。  new window
7.Dallaire, C.、Poitras, J.、Aubin, K.、Lavoie, A.、Moore, L.(2012)。Emergency department triage: Do experienced nurses agree on triage scores?。The Journal of Emergency Medical，42(6)，736-740。  new window
8.Dateo, J.(2013)。What factors increase the accuracy and inter-rater reliability of the Emergency Severity Index among emergency nurses in triage adult patients?。Journal of Emergency Nursing，39(2)，203-207。  new window
9.Edwards, B.(2007)。Walking in - Initial visualisation and assessment at triage。Accident and Emergency Nursing，15(2)，73-78。  new window
10.Fernandes, C.、Tanabe, P.、Gilboy, N.、Johnson, L.、McNair, R.、Rosenau, A.(2005)。Five-level triage: A report from the ACEP/ENA five-level triage task force。Journal of Emergency Nursing，31(1)，39-50。  new window
11.Martin, A.、Davodspm, C. L.、Panik, A.、Buckenmyer, C.、Delpais, P.、Ortiz, M.(2014)。An examination of ESI triage scoring accuracy in relationship to ED nursing attitudes and experience。Journal of Emergency Nursing，40(5)，416-418。  new window
12.Olofsson, P.、Gellerstedt, M.、Carlström, E. D.(2009)。Manchester Triage in Sweden-Interrater reliability and accuracy。International Emergency Nursing，17(3)，143-148。  new window
13.Parenti, N.、Reggiani, M.、Iannone, P.、Percudani, D.、Dowding, D.(2014)。A systematic review on the validity and reliability of an emergency department triage scale, the Manchester Triage System。International Journal of Nursing Studies，51(7)，1062-1069。  new window
14.Reay, G.、Rankin, J. A.(2013)。The application of theory to triage decision-making。International Emergency Nursing，21(2)，97-102。  new window
15.Stanfield, L. M.(2015)。Clinical decision making in triage: An integrative review。Journal of Emergency Nursing，41(5)，396-403。  new window
16.Storm-Versloot, M. N.、Ubbink, D. T.、Kappelhof, J.、Luitse, J. S.(2011)。Comparison of an informally structured triage system, the emergency severity index, and the Manchester triage system to distinguish patient priority in the emergency department。Academic Emergency Medicine，18(8)，822-829。  new window
17.Twomey, M.、Qallis, L. A.、Myers, J. E.(2007)。Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales。Emergency Medicine Journal，24(7)，477-479。  new window
18.Wolf, L.(2010)。Acuity assignation an ethnographic exploration of clinical decision making by emergency nurses at initial patient presentation。Advanced Emergency Nurses Journal，32(3)，234-246。  new window
19.Yeh, S. Y.、Bullard, M. J.、Hu, P. M.、Liao, H. C.、Chin, H. K.、Wang, W. C.、Liaw, S. J.(2008)。An evaluation of the Taiwan triage scale in a regional hospital。Journal Emergency Critical Care Medicine，19(3)，102-112。  new window
20.邱曉彥、陳麗琴、林琇珠、桑潁潁、康巧娟、邱艷芬(20080600)。臺灣急診檢傷新趨勢--五級檢傷分類系統。護理雜誌，55(3)，87-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳淑貞(2007)。急診室護理人員檢傷知識、檢傷判斷一致性及其影響因素之探討(碩士論文)。弘光科技大學，台中市。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳淑新(2007)。急診護理人員檢傷分級能力現況及其影響因素探討(碩士論文)。臺北醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.簡杏津(2013)。新制五級檢傷分類標準一致性之探討--以中部某醫學中心為例(碩士論文)。東海大學，台中市。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.社團法人台灣急診醫學會檢傷分類工作小組(2015)。急診五級檢傷分類基準，http://www.sem.org.tw/tsem/7doActionValueID=1535&menuID=1179069063&doAction=detail#none。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃集仁(2006)。急診檢傷分類國際發展趨勢與國內因應策略，台北：長庚紀念醫院。  延伸查詢new window
3.衛生福利部(2013)。急診五級檢傷分類基準，http://www.mohw.gov.tw/CHT/DOMA/DMl_P.aspx?f_list_no=608&fod_list_no=945&doc_no=1886。  new window
4.Gilboy, N.，Tanabe, P.，Travers, D.，Rosenau, A.(2013)。Emergency severity index (ESI): A triage tool for emergency department，http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/hospital/esi/index.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.韓晶彥(2012)。檢傷分類。急症護理。台北：新文京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1422（臺灣：1407，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2488187 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68300826
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上