從技術知識進步鏈辨識技術機會之研究：以Telematics為例_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	從技術知識進步鏈辨識技術機會之研究：以Telematics為例
書刊名：	資訊管理學報
作者：	謝文昌／陳樹榮
作者(外文)：	Hsieh, Wen-chang／Chen, Shu-jung
出版日期：	2017
卷期：	24:4
頁次：	頁369-408
主題關鍵詞：	專利引用；基礎性技術知識；新穎性技術知識；重覆分析；深層知識；Patent citation；Basic technological knowledge；Novelty technological knowledge；Redundancy analysis；Deep knowledge
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:22 點閱:36

從全球技術發展的視角，針對特定或專業領域的技術資料，以技術網絡分析觀點進行各種由淺入深的知識（shallow to deep knowledge）挖掘，不僅是組織因應外部環境動態變化、洞察機先與掌握策略性知識重要的來源，也是經營決策者改善創新績效與降低投資風險，終日不可迴避的管理議題。是以，本文依研究目的與專利檢索策略，從USPTO專利資料庫搜尋與關鍵字相關的所有專利形成分析資料集，並以文件中「引用參考（reference cited）」欄位的列舉資料進行相關專利的連結，進而構成一個專利引用網絡（patent citation network）。其後，也以此網絡為分析基礎，提出一個專利組合層級且具理論基礎的技術知識進步鏈分析（technological knowledge progress chain analysis; TKPCA）架構或模型；其分析結果，不僅可藉此辨識具潛在性的關鍵技術功能或技術組合的發展機會，其分析模型也可增補於先前研究的不足。另外，本研究也選擇「telematics」領域的專利，作為TKPCA模型檢驗的分析標的，同時，基於分析需求，TKPCA的架構，也包含了基礎性技術群聚分析（BTKCA）、新穎性技術群聚分析（NTKCA）與鏈接群聚知識重覆分析（LCKRA）三個子模組。最後，從telematics專利資料的三階段分析過程中，也分別發現了很多有用且有價值的技術發展情報與知識。本研究認為，這些發現對於telematics領域未來整體發展的創新促進與企業研發活動的投入和佈局，將會產生很重要的影響。

以文找文

Purpose-The purpose of this study is to propose a dense network framework of technological knowledge progress chain analysis (TKPCA) on the basis of patent citation and to mine a variety of shallow-to-deep knowledge as an identification of developing potential technology opportunities. Design/methodology/approach-The ＂telematics＂ is the target for technological analysis in this study. Meanwhile, it is also used as the keyword to undertake patent retrieval from USPTO. Afterwards, an affiliated network (PCAN) will be set up as the analytic information database for TKPCA, including 3 sub-modules, BTKCA (basic technological knowledge clusters analysis), NTKCA (novelty technological knowledge clusters analysis), and LCKRA (linking clusters knowledge redundancy analysis). Findings-(1)From the findings of BTKCA, it appears that the basic technology of telematics consists of nine patent clusters; there are 4 main directions of technology development among network categories formed by these clusters. (2)From the findings of NTKCA, it appears the novelty technology of telematics consists of seven patent clusters in total. Among them, three clusters are involved and developed the most positively and intensively by manufactures whilst the rest 4 technology clusters are developing individually. (3)From the findings of LCKRA, the electronic image display technology has the most significant impact on novelty technology development as well as the innovative focus from the manufacturers' R&D. Furthermore, the values could be provided for R&D engineers to grasp the whole picture of telematics and to use as significant reference while assessing the potential opportunities and development. Research limitations/implications-The specialization growing technology is the main research subject regarding TKPCA in this study rather than emerging technology. Therefore, TKPCA does not consider the possible impact from non-patent literature citation, which could be improved in the future research. Moreover, the findings stated in this article mainly are searched with ＂telematics＂ keyword, so the outcome may differ accordingly once the keyword range changes. Practical implications - (1)The findings from BTKCA for business-level decision-maker are not only the imperative references to scheme an integrated function for a new product, but a very important technological information to predict whether it could become a welcome merchandise or not. (2)The findings from NTKCA for functional-level R&D manager present not only the imperative reference information to assess the timing of R&D projects, but a very important assessment information to identify the potential opportunities for technology R&D. (3) The findings from LCKRA for the operational-level engineers include not only the imperative evaluation information for R&D development method and direction, but an indispensable knowledge and insight into the development on key technologies. Originality/value-(1) TKPCA is a new concept and approach to extract a variety of technology knowledge simultaneously by the way from shallow to deep and multilayer; it is also an analysis framework, which can integrate common knowledge discussed rarely in traditional research. (2)The outcome of TKPCA cannot only speed up the evolution of overall technical specialization but also enhance the organization's short-term innovation performance, which is difficult to obtain through knowledge discovery in databases.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Narin, F.、Noma, E.、Perry, R.(1987)。Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength。Research Policy，16，143-155。
2.	Park, G.、Park, Y.(2006)。On the Measurement of Patent Stock as Knowledge Indicators。Technological Forecasting and Social Change，73(7)，793-812。
3.	Adner, R.、Levinthal, D.(2002)。The Emergence of Emerging Technologies。California Management Review，45(1)，50-66。
4.	Knudsen, M. P.(2007)。The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success。Journal of Product Innovation Management，24(2)，117-138。
5.	陳樹榮、賴奎魁(20121000)。以自我技術網絡觀點辨識商品化最佳合作夥伴。管理與系統，19(4)，589-623。延伸查詢
6.	Choe, H.、Lee, D. H.、Seo, I. W.、Kim, H. D.(2013)。Patent citation network analysis for the domain of organic photovoltaic cells: Country, institution, and technology field。Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews，26，492-505。
7.	Choi, C.、Park, Y.(2009)。Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths。Technological Forecasting and Social Change，76(6)，754-768。
8.	Geroski, P. A.(1990)。Innovation, Technological Opportunity, and Market Structure。Oxford Economic Papers，42(3)，586-602。
9.	Hegde, D.、Sampat, B.(2009)。Examiner citations, applicant citations, and the private value of patents。Economic Letters，105(3)，287-289。
10.	Stuart, T. E.(1998)。Network Position and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry。Administrative Science Quarterly，43(3)，668-698。
11.	Nonaka, I.(1990)。Redundant, overlapping organization: A Japanese approach to managing the innovation process。California Management Review，32(3)，27-38。
12.	Ahuja, G.、Lampert, C. M.(2001)。Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions。Strategic Management Journal，22，521-543。
13.	Li, X.、Chen, H.、Huang, Z.、Roco, M. C.(2007)。Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976-2004)。Journal of Nanoparticle Research，9(3)，337-352。
14.	Singh, J.、Fleming, L.(2009)。Lone Inventors as Sources of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality?。Management Science，56(1)，41-56。
15.	Fontana, Roberto、Nuvolari, Alessandro、Verspagen, Bart(2009)。Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: An application to data communication standards。Economics of Innovation and New Technology，18(4)，311-336。
16.	Verspagen, B.(2007)。Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: a study on the history of fuel cell research。Advances in Complex Systems，10(1)，93-115。
17.	Klevorick, A. K.、Levin, R. C.、Nelson, R. R.、Winter, S. G.(1995)。On the sources and significance of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities。Research Policy，24(2)，185-205。
18.	Nieto, M.、Quevedo, P.(2005)。Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort。Technovation，25(10)，1141-1157。
19.	Lee, Keun、Lim, Chaisung(2001)。Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries。Research Policy，30(3)，459-483。
20.	Yoon, B.、Park, Y.(2004)。A text-mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high-technology trend。Journal of High Technology Management Research，15(1)，37-50。
21.	Jaffe, A. B.(1986)。Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value。American Economic Review，76(5)，984-1001。
22.	Cantwell, J. A.、Vertova, G.(2004)。Historical evolution of technological diversification。Research Policy，33(3)，511-529。
23.	Spinello, R. A.(1998)。The Knowledge Chain。Business Horizons，41(6)，4-14。
24.	翁順裕、賴奎魁(20091000)。從社會網絡分析觀點探討技術的趨同性--以保險商業方法專利為例。管理學報，26(5)，485-506。延伸查詢
25.	Podolny, Joel M.、Stuart, Toby E.(1995)。A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change。American Journal of Sociology，100(5)，1224-1260。
26.	Alcacer, J.、Gittelman, M.(2006)。Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations。Review of Economics and Statistics，88(4)，774-779。
27.	Harhoff, Dietmar、Narin, Francis、Scherer, F. M.、Vopel, Katrin(1999)。Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions。The Review of Economics & Statistics，81(3)，511-515。
28.	Lai, K.-K.、Wu, S.-J.(2005)。Using the Patent Co-citation Approach to Establish a New Patent Classification System。Information Processing and Management，41(2)，313-330。
29.	Stuart, T. E.、Podolny, J. M.(1996)。Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities。Strategic Management Journal，17(S1)，21-38。
30.	Zhuge, H.(2002)。A Knowledge Flow Model for Peer-to-peer Team Knowledge Sharing and Management。Expert Systems with Applications，23(1)，23-30。
31.	Nonaka, I.、Toyama, R.、Konno, N.(2000)。SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation。Long Range Planning，33(1)，5-34。
32.	Weitzman, M.(1998)。Recombinant growth。The Quarterly Journal of Economics，113(2)，331-361。
33.	Nonaka, Ikujiro、Toyama, Ryoko(2003)。The Knowledge-creating Theory Revisited: Knowledge Creation as a Synthesizing Process。Knowledge Management Research & Practice，1(1)，2-10。
34.	Lee, Ching Chyi、Yang, Jie(2000)。Knowledge Value Chain。Journal of Management Development，19(9)，783-793。
35.	Ernst, H.(2003)。Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management。World Patent Information，25(3)，233-242。
36.	賴奎魁、林美蘭、張淑敏、張善斌(20060300)。專利分析相關文獻之分類研究：採用書目計量學方法。科技管理學刊，11(1)，137-168。延伸查詢
37.	Katila, R.、Mang, P. Y.(2003)。Exploiting Technological opportunities: the timing of collaborations。Research Policy，32(2)，317-332。
38.	Oltra, M. J.、Flor, M.(2003)。The Impact of Technological Opportunities and Innovative Capabilities on Firms' Output Innovation。Creativity and Innovation Management，12(3)，137-144。
39.	Sterlacchini, A.(1994)。Technological Opportunities, Intraindustry Spillovers And Firm R&D Intensity。Economics of Innovation and New Technology，3(2)，123-138。
40.	林忠亮、王明妤(20131200)。基於科學與技術缺口發掘技術機會：以生質丁醇為例。科技管理學刊，18(4)，29-59。延伸查詢
41.	張書豪、樊晉源(20140300)。車載資通訊技術佈局專利策略研究。管理資訊計算，3(1)，87-98。延伸查詢
42.	陳樹榮、張秉鈞、賴奎魁、劉佩雯(20141000)。專利轉讓最適廠商與評估指標關聯性之研究：以Kodak數位影像為例。資訊管理學報，21(4)，417-445。延伸查詢
43.	廖學隆、楊家豪、黃隆洲(20130300)。車輛電子產業的現況與未來發展。機械月刊，39(3)=452，64-78。延伸查詢
44.	Alvarenga Neto, R. C. D.、Choo, C. W.(2010)。The post Nonaka concept of ba: Eclectic roots, evolutionary paths and future advancements。Proceedings of the American Society of Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting，47(1)，1-10。
45.	Arts, S.、Veugelers, R.(2014)。Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough innovation。Industrial and Corporate Change，26(6)，1215-1246。
46.	Conti, R.、Gambardella, A.、Mariani, M.(2013)。Learning to be Edison: inventors, organizations, and breakthrough inventions。Organization Science，25(3)，833-849。
47.	Fleming, L.(2001)。Recombinant uncertainty in technology search。Management Science，47(1)，117-132。
48.	Kaplan, S.、Vakili, K.(2014)。The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation。Strategic Management Journal，36(10)，1435-1457。
49.	Kriegel, H. P.、Borgwardt, K. M.、Kröger, P.、Pryakhin, A.、Schubert, M.、Zimek, A.(2007)。Future trends in data mining。Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery，15(1)，87-97。
50.	Lampe, R.(2012)。Strategic citation。Review of Economics and Statistics，94(1)，320-333。
51.	Levinthal, D. A.(1998)。The slow pace of rapid technological change: gradualism and punctuation in technological change。Industrial and Corporate Change，7(2)，217-247。
52.	Najafabadi, M. M.、Villanustre, F.、Khoshgoftaar, T. M.、Seliya, N.、Wald, R.、Muharemagic, E.(2015)。Deep learning applications and challenges in big data analytics。Journal of Big Data，2(1)，1-21。
53.	Najmaei, A.、Sadeghinejad, Z.(2009)。Competitive strategic alliances through knowledge value chain。International Review of Business Research Papers，5(3)，297-310。
54.	Narin, F.(1995)。Patents as indicator for the evaluation of industrial research output。Scientometrics，34(4)，489-496。
55.	Roach, M.、Cohen, W.(2013)。Lens or Prism? An Assessment of Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows from Public Research。Management Science，59(2)，504-525。
56.	Shimizu, H.(1995)。Ba-Principle: New Logic for the Real-time Emergence of Information。Holonics，5(1)，67-69。
57.	Mina, A.、Ramlogan, R.、Tampubolon, G.、Metcalfe, J. S.(2007)。Mapping evolutionary trajectories: Applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge。Research policy，36(5)，789-806。
58.	Trajtenberg, M.(1990)。A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations。RAND Journal of Economics，21(1)，172-187。
59.	Trajtenberg, Manuel、Henderson, Rebecca、Jaffe, Adam B.(1997)。University versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention。Economics of Innovation and New Technology，5(1)，19-50。
60.	Teece, David J.(1986)。Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy。Research Policy，15(6)，285-305。
61.	Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology，94(suppl.)，S95-S120。
62.	Sorenson, O.、Rivkin, J. W.、Fleming, L.(2006)。Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow。Research Policy，35(7)，994-1017。
63.	Nonaka, I.、Konno, N.(1998)。The Concept Of `Ba': Building Foundation for Knowledge Creation。California Management Review，40(3)，40-54。
64.	Porter, A. L.、Detampel, M. J.(1995)。Technology Opportunities Analysis。Technological Forecasting and Social Change，49(3)，237-255。

會議論文
1.	Chen, S. J.、Su, F. P.、Lai, K. K.、Yang, M. T.、Chang, P. C.(2013)。The patent information, strategic patent deployment thinking, and technology strategies of small and medium-sized enterprises。The Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology，(會議日期: 2013/07/28-08/01)。California。48-61。
2.	Agrawal, R.、Srikant, R.(1995)。Mining sequential patterns。1995 international conference on data engineering，(會議日期: 1995/03/06-10)。Taipei。3-14。
3.	Becker, W.、Peters, J.(2000)。Technological opportunities, absorptive capacities and innovation。The Eighth International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Conference，(會議日期: 2000/06/28-07/02)。Manchester：Centre for Research in Innovation and Competition, University Manchester。
4.	Gourlay, S. N.(2003)。The SECI model of knowledge creation: some empirical shortcomings’。Fourth European Conference on Knowledge Management，(會議日期: 2003/09/18-19)。Oxford。377-385。
5.	Knudsen, M.(2005)。Redundancy and Knowledge Sharing: Suggesting and Testing a New Empirical Construct。The EMNet Conference: Economics and Management of Networks，(會議日期: 2005/09/15-17)。Budapest。

研究報告
1.	Abrams, D.、Akcigit, U.、Popadak, J.(2015)。Patent Value and Citations: Creative Destruction or Strategic Disruption?。
2.	Jaffe, A. B.、de Rassenfosse, Gaetan(2016)。Patent Citation Data in Social Science Research: Overview and Best Practices。

學位論文
1.	陳樹榮(2011)。以自我技術網絡觀點辨識RFID新產品開發適合之合作廠商(博士論文)。雲林科技大學，雲林。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Hargadon, A.(2003)。How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth about How Companies Innovate。Boston, MA：Harvard Business School Press。
2.	Basalla, G.(1988)。The Evolution of Technology。Cambridge University Press。
3.	Burt, Ronald S.(1992)。Structure Holes: The Social Structure of Competition。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard Business School Press。
4.	Arthur, W. B.(2009)。The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves。Free Press：Simon & Schuster。
5.	Merrill, M. D.、Tennyson, R. D.(1977)。Concept Teaching: An Instructional Design Guide。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Educational Technology。
6.	Nelson, Richard R.、Winter, Sidney G.(1982)。An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change。Cambridge, MA：Cambridge University Press：Belknap Press。
7.	Nonaka, Ikujiro、Takeuchi, Hirotaka(1995)。The Knowledge-Creating Company。New York：Oxford University Press, Inc.。

其他
1.	Arts, Sam，Veugelers, Reinhilde。The Technological Origins and Novelty of Breakthrough Inventions，https:// ssrn.com/abstract=2230366。

圖書論文
1.	Glover, F.、Laguna, M.(1993)。Tabu Search。Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Optimization。Oxford：Scientific Pubs。
2.	Cohen, W. M.、Levin, R. C.(1989)。Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure。Handbook of Industrial Organization。Elsevier Science。
3.	Lakatos, I.(1970)。Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs。Criticism and the growth of knowledge。Cambridge, England：Cambridge University Press。
4.	Porter, M. E.、Fuller, M. B.(1986)。Coalitions and Global Strategy。Competitive in Global Industries。Boston, MA：Harvard Business School Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	以主路徑分析探討停車場系統技術演化
2.	以感性工學觀點探討車載資通訊系統採用之前置因素
3.	整合專利家族與主徑路分析探討技術軌跡--以薄膜太陽能電池為例
4.	科學學習生態系統的資源流通性與社會包容性
5.	發掘無線充電市場技術策略群組：以技術相似性為基礎
6.	社會網絡分析方法探討LED公司專利侵權訴訟關係之角色與位置
7.	科技管理三重奏：策略視角的分析與評論
8.	太陽光電公司研發組合與知識流：專利計量觀點
9.	從互補性與增補性探討專利收購之研究--以Apple與Samsung智慧型手機為例
10.	專利轉讓最適廠商與評估指標關聯性之研究：以Kodak數位影像為例
11.	從專利引證相似度探討商業模式相互影響網絡與社群結構之研究--以臺灣IC設計產業為例
12.	車載資通訊技術佈局專利策略研究
13.	基於科學與技術缺口發掘技術機會：以生質丁醇為例
14.	採用科學文獻建立專利技術分類系統
15.	以自我技術網絡觀點辨識商品化最佳合作夥伴

1.	半導體產業發明人流動與技術相似度關連之研究─技術外溢與社會網絡分析之應用
2.	多國公司創新網絡構形與網絡管理機制之探討
3.	專利分析相關文獻之分類與演化趨勢研究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	響應式網站設計成熟期間之轉換障礙影響--事前實證與事後回顧
2.	推動高等教育校務經營全面品質管理之研究--以國立清華大學為實證
3.	國際化決策的影響因素之探討：行為理論觀點
4.	集團國際化、家族控制與新股折價關聯之探討
5.	民眾對於閉路攝影機評估與安全認知因果模式分析
6.	行動支付簽名識別之驗證協定
7.	大數據時代的個人資料隱私與去識別化之探討
8.	投資人審計品質認知--以會計師性別組合分析
9.	盈餘管理能有效誘導投資提升公司價值嗎？
10.	CEO Power and Bank Risk-taking during Financial Crisis
11.	國內大學BIM人才培育之問題評析與建議
12.	工程數量計算專業之重要性
13.	模糊層級分析法於碼頭型式評選之分析--以高雄某商港為例
14.	法制規範下之公司治理效益--以審計及薪酬委員會為例
15.	多層次架構之營建企業經營教學遊戲之設計與評估

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫