專利轉讓最適廠商與評估指標關聯性之研究：以Kodak數位影像為例_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	專利轉讓最適廠商與評估指標關聯性之研究：以Kodak數位影像為例
書刊名：	資訊管理學報
作者：	陳樹榮／張秉鈞／賴奎魁／劉佩雯
作者(外文)：	Chen, Shu-jung／Chang, Ping-chun／Lai, Kuei-kuei／Liu, Pei-wen
出版日期：	2014
卷期：	21:4
頁次：	頁417-445
主題關鍵詞：	專利釋出；行動通信裝置；數位圖像技術；專利共引用分析；技術重覆分析；Patent transfer；Smartphone；Digital imaging；Patent co-citation analysis；Technological redundancy analysis
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:15 點閱:241

如何從專利資料庫挖掘有價值的專利資訊，以作為公司技術規劃或解決經營實務問題是重要的研究議題。本文以Kodak 公司為研究對象，並選擇其「數位圖像技術」重要專利的組合為技術功能範圍。資料集的蒐集，本研究以「自我技術網絡」建構概念形成；而資料的分析，同時採用專利共引用（PCA）與技術重覆（TRA）兩種分析方法。結果顯示：(1)目前應用Kodak 數位影像技術的產業中，行動通信裝置是專利釋出最具發展潛力的產業；(2)Apple 是Kodak 專利釋出最適的廠商；(3)在專利轉讓前後，Apple 與Kodak 兩者的技術知識信賴（TKR）值皆維持高度的一致性；(4)專利轉讓後，Apple 公司的技術知識地位（TKS）增加，但不影響Kodak 的領先地位；(5)專利轉讓後，從Kodak 觀察Apple 的增補知識和互補知識（CIK

以文找文

Purpose－This study aimed to explore how a technology leading company could measure through patent indicators in the business restructuring process to identify the best suitable transferee. Design/methodology/approach－Kodak was selected as research target in this study. By using the important patent family portfolio of its “digital image” technologies, and to develop an analysis dataset based on the concept of establishing ego-centered technological network. The study adopts both patent co-citation approach (PCA) andtechnological redundancy approach (TRA) to data analysis. Findings－The results found that (1) the most potential industry for patent release is digital mobile communication device industry; (2) Apple is the most suitable patent transferee for Kodak; (3) before and after the patent transfer, the technological knowledge reliability of Apple and Kodak remained highly consistent; and (4) after patent transfer, Apple’s technological knowledge status has increased but did not affect Kodak’s lead position; and (5) from Kodak viewpoint, Apple's supplementary and complementary knowledge has significantly increased. Research limitations/implications－The findings of the study were only based on the patents portfolio of tested technologies. If widening the technical scope, it might produce different results. Practical implications－There are five factors worth considering when select the best suitable company. (1) patent transferee shall have potential in the technology development of its industry; (2) patent transferee shall have integration ability of required technologies in its industry; (3) the requirement of product functions for patent transferee and the technology of patent transferor should contain structural similarities; (4) the product’s attributes of patent transferee and transferor need to have obvious differentiation in the separate industries; (5) the patent transferor should contain the supplementary and complementary for transferee to acquire. Originality/value 1. This study suggests that it is not only a new concept of technology network analysis, but also a systematic method of analysis. At the same time, it is also very suitable for the management of SME’s enterprises to make technological decision, assess the merging and acquiring targets, and seek the important technology information. 2. This study proposed a clear definition to measure both indicators of the common internal knowledge (CIK) and common external knowledge (CEK) of the companies, which has filled the research gap of previous studies.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Park, G.、Park, Y.(2006)。On the Measurement of Patent Stock as Knowledge Indicators。Technological Forecasting and Social Change，73(7)，793-812。
2.	陳樹榮、賴奎魁(20121000)。以自我技術網絡觀點辨識商品化最佳合作夥伴。管理與系統，19(4)，589-623。延伸查詢
3.	Ali-Yrkkö, J.、Hyytinen, A.、Pajarinen, M.(2005)。Does patenting increase the probability of being acquired? Evidence from cross-border and domestic acquisitions。Applied Financial Economics，15(14)，1007-1017。
4.	Brouthers, K.、Brouthers, L.、Harris, P.(1997)。The five stages of co-operative venture strategy process。Journal of General Management，23(1)，39-52。
5.	Burshtein, S.(2001)。Intellectual property and technology due diligence in business transactions。The Journal of World Intellectual Property，4(3)，403-458。
6.	Burshtein, S.(2001)。Intellectual property and technology due diligence in business transactions。The Journal of World Intellectual Property，4(4)，513-548。
7.	Chen, S.H.、Wang, P.W.、Chen, C.M.、Lee, H.T.(2010)。An analytic hierarchy process approach with linguistic variables for selection of an R&D strategic alliance partner。Computers & Industrial Engineering，58(2)，278-287。
8.	Choe, H.、Lee, D. H.、Seo, I. W.、Kim, H. D.(2013)。Patent citation network analysis for the domain of organic photovoltaic cells: Country, institution, and technology field。Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews，26，492-505。
9.	Choi, C.、Park, Y.(2009)。Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths。Technological Forecasting and Social Change，76(6)，754-768。
10.	Courtial, J. P.、Callon, M.、Sigogneau, A.(1993)。The use of patent titles for identifying the topics of invention and forecasting trends。Scientometrics，26(2)，231-242。
11.	Duysters, G.、Kok, G.、Vaandrager, M.(1999)。Crafting successful strategic technology partnerships。R&D Management，29(4)，343-351。
12.	Gooding, R.Z.(1998)。When bad things happen to good mergers。Financial Executive，24-28。
13.	Gulati, R.、Gargiulo, M.(1999)。Where do inter- organizational networks come from?。American Journal of Sociology，104(5)，1439-1493。
14.	Hegde, D.、Sampat, B.(2009)。Examiner citations, applicant citations, and the private value of patents。Economic Letters，105(3)，287-289。
15.	Hitt, M. A.、Ahlstrom, D.、Dacin, M. T.、Levitas, E.、Svobodina, L.(2004)。The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia。Organization Science，15(2)，173-185。
16.	Lai, K. K.、Chang, S. B.、Chang, S. M.(2006)。Mobility of technology positioning with change in patent portfolio。The Journal of American Academy of Business，10(1)，90-96。
17.	Lingua, D.G.(2005)。INPADOC: 30 years of endeavours yet unmapped territories remain。World Patent Information，27(2)，105-111。
18.	Nijssen, E.J.、Van Reekum, R.、Hulshoff, H.E.(2001)。Gathering and using information for the selection of technology partners。Technological Forecasting & Social Change，67(2)，221-237。
19.	Breitzman, Anthony F.、Thomas, Patrick(2002)。Using Patent Citation Analysis to Target/Value M&A Candidates。Research-Technology Management，45(5)，28-36。
20.	Huang, Mu-Hsuan、Chiang, Li-Yun、Chen, Da-Zen(2003)。Constructing a Patent Citation Map Using Bibliographic Coupling: A Study of Taiwan's High-tech Companies。Scientometrics，58(3)，489-506。
21.	Stuart, T. E.(1998)。Network Position and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry。Administrative Science Quarterly，43(3)，668-698。
22.	Podolny, J. M.、Stuart, T. E.(1995)。A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change。American Journal of Sociology，100(5)，1224-1260。
23.	Yoon, B.、Park, Y.(2004)。A Text-Mining-based Patent Network: Analytical Tool for High-technology Trend。The Journal of High Technology Management Research，15，37-50。
24.	Ernst, Holger(2003)。Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management。World Patent Information，25(3)，233-242。
25.	Von Wartburg, I.、Teichert, T.、Rost, K.(2005)。Inventive Progress Measured by Multi-stage Patent Citation Analysis。Research Policy，34(10)，1591-1607。
26.	Griliches, Z.(1990)。Patent Statistics as Economic Indicator: A Survey。Journal of Economic Literature，28(4)，1661-1707。
27.	Büyüközkan, G.、Feyzioğlu, O.、Nebol, E.(2008)。Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain。International Journal of Production Economics，113(1)，148-158。
28.	Narin, F.(1994)。Patent bibliometrics。Scientometrics，30(1)，147-155。
29.	Lanjouw, Jean O.、Schankerman, Mark(2001)。Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition。RAND Journal of Economics，32(1)，129-151。
30.	Gulati, Ranjay(1995)。Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis。Administrative Science Quarterly，40(4)，619-652。
31.	翁順裕、賴奎魁(20091000)。從社會網絡分析觀點探討技術的趨同性--以保險商業方法專利為例。管理學報，26(5)，485-506。延伸查詢
32.	Small, Henry G.(1973)。Co-citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship between Two Documents。Journal of the American Society for Information Science，24(4)，265-269。
33.	Ahuja, G.(2000)。Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study。Administrative Science Quarterly，45(3)，425-455。
34.	Lai, K.-K.、Wu, S.-J.(2005)。Using the Patent Co-citation Approach to Establish a New Patent Classification System。Information Processing and Management，41(2)，313-330。
35.	Stuart, T. E.、Podolny, J. M.(1996)。Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities。Strategic Management Journal，17(S1)，21-38。
36.	Rindfleisch, A.、Moorman, C.(2001)。The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: a strength-of-ties perspective。Journal of Marketing，65(2)，1-18。
37.	Mowery, David C.、Oxley, Joanne E.、Silverman, Brian S.(1998)。Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm。Research policy，27(5)，507-523。
38.	Cantwell, J.、Vertova, G.(2004)。Historical evolution of technological diversification。Research Policy，33(3)，511-529。
39.	Rowley, T. J.(1997)。Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences。Academy of Management Review，22(4)，887-910。
40.	Jaffe, Adam B.、Trajtenberg, Manuel(1999)。International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations。Economics of Innovation and New Technology，8(1/2)，105-136。
41.	Granovetter, Mark S.(1985)。Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness。American Journal of Sociology，91(3)，481-510。
42.	Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology，94(suppl.)，S95-S120。
43.	Fleming, L.、Sorenson, O.(2001)。Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data。Research Policy，30(7)，1019-1039。
44.	Sorenson, O.、Rivkin, J. W.、Fleming, L.(2006)。Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow。Research Policy，35(7)，994-1017。
45.	Sharabchiev, J. T.(1989)。Cluster Analysis of Bibliographic References as a Scientometrics Methods。Scientometrics，15(1/2)，127-137。
46.	Duysters, G.、Man, A. D.、Wildeman, L.(1999)。A Network Approach to Alliance Management。European Management Journal，17(2)，182-187。
47.	Alcácer, J.、Gittelman, M.(2006)。Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations。Review of Economics and Statistics，88(4)，774-779。
48.	Li, X.、Chen, Hsin-Chun、Huang, Z.、Roco, M. C.(2007)。Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976-2004)。Journal of Nanoparticle Research，9(3)，337-352。
49.	Simmons, E. S.(1995)。Patent Family Databases 10 Years Later。Database，18(3)，28-37。

會議論文
1.	Chen, S. J.、Su, F. P.、Lai, K. K.、Yang, M. T.、Chang, P. C.(2013)。The patent information, strategic patent deployment thinking, and technology strategies of small and medium-sized enterprises。The Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology，(會議日期: 2013/07/28-08/01)。California。48-61。

學位論文
1.	陳樹榮(2011)。以自我技術網絡觀點辨識RFID新產品開發適合之合作廠商(博士論文)。雲林科技大學，雲林。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Carleton, J.P.、Lineberry, C.S.(2004)。Achieving Post-Merger Success。San Francisco：John Wiley & Sons。
2.	Knoke, D.、Kuklinski, J. H.(1992)。Network analysis。Sage, Calif：Newbury Park。
3.	Patrick, A.G.(2011)。Mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructurings。NJ：Hoboken, Wiley。
4.	Sudarsanam, S.(2003)。Creating value from mergers and acquisitions: the challenges an integrated and international perspective。Harlow：Prentice Hall。
5.	Basalla, George(1988)。The Evolution of Technology。Cambridge University Press。
6.	Burt, Ronald S.(1995)。Structural Hole: The Social Structure of Competition。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。
7.	Wasserman, Stanley、Faust, Katherine(1994)。Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications。Cambridge University Press。
8.	Rivette, Kevin G.、Kline, David(2000)。Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents。Boston, MA：Harvard Business School Press。
9.	Doz, Yves L.、Hamel, Gary(1998)。Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering。Boston, Massachusetts：Harvard Business School Press。
10.	周延鵬(2006)。一堂課2000億：智慧財產的戰略及戰術。台北：工商財經數位。延伸查詢

圖書論文
1.	Glover, F.、Laguna, M.(1993)。Tabu Search。Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Optimization。Oxford：Scientific Pubs。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	以主路徑分析探討停車場系統技術演化
2.	整合專利家族與主徑路分析探討技術軌跡--以薄膜太陽能電池為例
3.	科學學習生態系統的資源流通性與社會包容性
4.	從技術知識進步鏈辨識技術機會之研究：以Telematics為例
5.	發掘無線充電市場技術策略群組：以技術相似性為基礎
6.	社會網絡分析方法探討LED公司專利侵權訴訟關係之角色與位置
7.	科技管理三重奏：策略視角的分析與評論
8.	太陽光電公司研發組合與知識流：專利計量觀點
9.	從互補性與增補性探討專利收購之研究--以Apple與Samsung智慧型手機為例
10.	以自我技術網絡觀點辨識商品化最佳合作夥伴
11.	ING安泰併購案對資深業務員認知失調的影響
12.	在核心與邊陲之間技術的深耕與探索--以保險商業方法專利為例
13.	臺灣佛教網站之社會網絡與呈現初探
14.	探討技術網絡之社群結構與位置關係--以保險商業方法專利為例
15.	從社會網絡分析觀點探討技術的趨同性--以保險商業方法專利為例

1.	半導體產業發明人流動與技術相似度關連之研究─技術外溢與社會網絡分析之應用
2.	多國公司創新網絡構形與網絡管理機制之探討

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	從互補性與增補性探討專利收購之研究--以Apple與Samsung智慧型手機為例
2.	以自我技術網絡觀點辨識商品化最佳合作夥伴
3.	以自我技術網絡觀點辨識RFID新產品開發適合之合作廠商
4.	從技術知識進步鏈辨識技術機會之研究：以Telematics為例
5.	珠江三角洲與澳門樓市
6.	運用詞彙權重技術於自動文件摘要之研究
7.	社群網站上訊息轉載意願影響因素之研究
8.	資訊隱私顧慮對社群網站使用者使用意圖影響之研究--以Facebook為例
9.	從專利引證相似度探討商業模式相互影響網絡與社群結構之研究--以臺灣IC設計產業為例
10.	採用科學文獻建立專利技術分類系統
11.	社會國的國家哲學--史坦恩的人格國家

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫