At present, Article 227 of the Criminal Law aims to protect the physical and mental development of adolescents, but the elements of the law are too rigid and inelastic, leading to the application of the results in practice more harm than good. This article takes the article 227 of the criminal law as the research topic, adopts the qualitative interview research way, takes one of the judges, the procurators and the lawyers as the interview object, the interview faces includes: Can achieve the legislative purpose through the penalty effectively? Whether the need to maintain criminal penalties? Is there a need for a review of the existing law? When the victim is reluctant to file an independent complaint, should he be limited in his right to file an independent complaint? Interviewees generally agreed that it was difficult to achieve the purpose of protecting the physical and mental health of minors through penalties, and that many problems, including the two-generation notices, and many more. The majority of victims have considerable ability to judge, punishment is not the only way to solve such problems, the proposed with the relevant administrative measures. Based on the protection of minors physical and mental health considerations, is still not rashly comprehensive decriminalization. For the age of the victims, it is recommended that the age of 12 years of age, 12 years of age under the age of 16 to distinguish the standard, and adjust the upper and lower penalties, increase the flexibility of the judge sentencing space. If opinions vary between the parent and child, it should limit the right of parents to file an independent complaint.