乾隆年間，朝鮮李氏皇朝不斷派員遠赴北京求學交流。其中著名者有金正喜（1786-1856），他精於經學和金石學，又是著名的書法大家，曾在嘉慶年間隨燕行使到北京。金正喜因此得以師事翁方綱，在經學以至詩歌批評方面，都受到翁氏的影響。本文旨在研究翁方綱在詩歌批評方面對金正喜的影響，首先論述金正喜與翁方綱二人在詩學方面的交流情況，然後從詩學門徑、重學問與性情的觀點兩方面，探討他們在詩論上的繼承關係。金正喜的詩學主張與翁方綱基本上是一致的。金正喜主張學詩者由近而遠，由宋、元入唐，從蘇軾、黄庭堅等詩人入手以學習杜甫。他能欣賞翁方綱以學問爲詩，卻反對無關實際的神韻詩。他重視性靈，但强調須具備學問和品德的修養，所以不滿袁枚佻巧浮薄的性靈詩。

During the rule of the Qianlong Emperor of China, correspondents from the Joseon Dynasty of Korea were continuously sent to Beijing for study and exchange purposes. Among those sent was the famous Kim Jeong-hui (1786-1856). Not only was he highly proficient in the classics and in epigraphy, but he was also an acclaimed calligrapher who had followed Emperor Joseon on his diplomatic ventures to Beijing during the rule of Emperor Jiaqing. Thus, Kim Jeong-hui received Weng Fanggang as a teacher, and was influenced by him regarding both the classics and poetry criticism. This study aimed to explore the influence of Weng Fanggang's poetry criticism on Kim Jeong-hui, starting by describing the two men's poetry-related exchanges and subsequently discussing their relationship of inheritance in the field of poetry from two perspectives: (a) the study of poetry and (b) emphasis on learning and temperament. In doing so, we discovered that Kim Jeong-hui's standpoint regarding the study of poetry was essentially identical to that of Weng Fanggang. Kim Jeong-hui's philosophy was to approach what is distant by first studying what is close. Therefore, he studied the poetry of the Song and Yuan Dynasties before studying that of the Tang Dynasty, and the works of Su Shi and Huang Tingjian before those of Du Fu. He appreciated ＂learning that is poetry＂ while opposing romantic poetry, which is not practically anchored. He emphasized spirituality but also stressed the need for learning and moral cultivation; therefore, he did not appreciate the frivolous and trivial spiritual poems of Yuan Mei.