臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：沒有規則的規則：幼兒自由遊戲規則之形塑
書刊名：幼兒教保研究期刊
作者：蔡牧君／李萍娜 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tsai, Mu-jun／Lee, Pyng-na
出版日期：2017
卷期：19
頁次：頁49-74
主題關鍵詞：自由遊戲；社會階級；遊戲；遊戲規則；Free play；Play rules；Social class
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:7
幼兒的自由遊戲本來是沒有規則，但是當兩位以上幼兒一起玩時，就會產生潛在的遵守原則，使遊戲得以依循某種脈絡持續在進行。此潛在的遵守原則即為本研究所欲探究之目的：幼兒在自由遊戲中，如何去建構遊戲中的規則。本研究採質性研究法進行探究，透過觀察幼兒在娃娃家和積木區的言談與行為，進行資料收集，並以開放編碼進行分析。研究發現幼兒在遊戲中會使用多種策略達成遊戲目的，經編碼分析有意見徵詢、直接命名、情境描述、直接命令、權力取得、拒絕和尋求外援等七項策略，爾後將之依執行強度和社會技巧進行分類，並依其程度的高低，進一步詮釋幼兒所使用的策略，在無形中形成同儕間社會階級之高低。
Originally, there is no rule at young children’s free play. When two children play together, they have to follow certain hidden rules to continue their play. This study attempted to understand the hidden rules that young children regulated during free play. A qualitative method was employed to observe young children’s conversation and behaviors in doll house center and manipulating center. From the open coding analysis of the collected data, the result found that young children used multiple strategies to regulate their rules to accomplish their play goal. Those strategies include opinion consulting, directly denominating (in-frame), directly denominating (out-frame), situation describing, direct command, power acquiring, refusal, and seeking help. Those strategies were hierarchically categorized into social skill and accomplishment. Young children’s manipulation of strategies to regulate rules during free play reproduces social class in the classroom.
期刊論文
1.Howes, C.(1980)。Peer play scale as an index of complexity of peer interaction。Developmental Psychology，16(4)，371-372。  new window
2.Parten, Mildred B.(1932)。Social participation among pre-school children。The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology，27(3)，243-269。  new window
3.陳惠茹、簡淑真(20110300)。幼兒在社會戲劇遊戲中的互動--以臺北市一所公立托兒所幼兒為例。輔仁民生學誌，17(1)，161-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.O'Neil, R.、Welsh, M.、Parke, R. D.、Wang, S.、Strand, C.(1997)。A longitudinal assessment of the academic correlates of early peer acceptance and rejection。Journal of a Clinical child Psychology，26(3)，290-303。  new window
5.盧雯月(20100300)。從後設溝通及框架理論的觀點探討想像遊戲與同儕衝突之互動關係。教育心理學報，41(3)，635-657。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Corsaro, W. A.(2012)。Interpretive reproduction in children's play。American Journal of Play，4(4)，488-504。  new window
7.Corsaro, W. A.(1993)。Interpretive reproduction in children's role play。Childhood，1(2)，64-74。  new window
8.Fantuzzo, J.、Coolahan, K.、Mendez, J.、McDermontt, P.、Sutton-Smith, B.(1998)。Contextually-Relevant Validation of Peer Play Constructs with African American Head Start Children: Penn Interactive Peer Play Scale。Early Childhood Research Quarterly，13(3)，411-431。  new window
9.Fantuzzo, J.、Mendez, J.、Tighe, E.(1998)。Parental assessment of peer play: Development and validation of the parent version of the Penn Interactive Peer Play Scale。Early Childhood Research Quarterly，13(4)，659-676。  new window
10.Fantuzzo, J.、Sutton-Smith, B.、Coolahan, K.、Manz, P.、Canning, S.、Debnam, D.(1995)。Assessment of preschool play interaction: Behaviors in young low-income children: Penn Interactive Peer Play Scale。Early Childhood Research Quarterly，10(4)，105-120。  new window
11.Hampton, V. R.、Fantuzzo, J. W.(2003)。The validity of the penn interactive peer play scale with urban, low-income kindergarten children。School Psychology Review，32，77-91。  new window
12.Muthukrishna, N.、Schluter, H.(2011)。Toward socially just, inclusive school culture。International Studies in Educational Administration，39(1)，19-32。  new window
13.Streib, J.(2011)。Class reproduction by four year olds。Qualitative Sociology，34(2)，337-352。  new window
14.吳云(2003)。對幼兒遊戲規則的探討--兼談幼兒規則遊戲。學前教育研究，2003(1)，20-22。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.潘慧玲(1991)。兒童遊戲之研究 (計畫編號：NSC 79-0301-H003-07)。台北市：行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭淑貞(2006)。幼兒於戲劇遊戲中之協商內容與策略(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.方金鳳(2004)。自由遊戲時間同儕互動策略之研究--以一個幼稚園大班為例(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.廖信達(2004)。幼兒遊戲。台北：群英。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ramsey, Patricia G.、謝美慧(2001)。幼兒的人際關係：改善幼兒在校同儕關係。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淑敏(1999)。幼兒遊戲。臺北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.Goffman, Erving(1974)。Frame Analysis。Northeastern University Press。  new window
5.Ellis, M. J.(1973)。Why people play?。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
6.Bourdieu, Pierre(1991)。Language and symbolic power。Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Selman, R. L.(1980)。The Growth of Interpersonal Understanding: developmental and clinical analyses。New York：Academic Press。  new window
8.Bateson, G.(1972)。Steps to an ecology of mind。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.Corsaro, W. A.(2003)。We are friends right? Inside kids' Culture。Washington, D.C.：Joseph Henry Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Giffin, H.(1984)。The coordination of meaning in the creation of a shared make-believe reality。Symbolic play: the development of social understanding。Academic Press。  new window
2.Bonica, L.(1993)。Negotiations among children and pretend play。Pretend play among 3-year-olds。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Rubin, K. H.、Fein, G. G.、Vandenberg, B.(1983)。Play。Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development。New York：Wiley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：426（臺灣：405，外國：21） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2328986 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68135913
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上