:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:心智步驟於專利法之評價:以美國與我國為中心
書刊名:國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者:郭宏杉 引用關係
作者(外文):Kuo, Hung-san
出版日期:2017
卷期:46:4
頁次:頁1819-1878
主題關鍵詞:方法專利心智過程心智步驟專利適格推理力記憶力心智活動美國專利法101條Process patentMental processesMental stepsPatent eligibilityReasoningMemoryMental activitiesSection 101
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:6
期刊論文
1.Perel, Maayan(2013)。Reviving the Gatekeeping Function: Optimizing the Exclusion Potential of Subject Matter Eligibility。Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology,23,237-310。  new window
2.Chiang, T. J.(2014)。Competing Visions of Patentable Subject Matter。George Washington Law Review,82,1858-1909。  new window
3.Bakels, R. B.(2008)。Should Only Technical Inventions Be Patentable, Following the European Example?。Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property,7,50-62。  new window
4.Asay, Clark D.(2016)。The Informational Value of Patents。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,31,259-324。  new window
5.Ford, L. R.(2005)。Alchemy and Patentability: Technology, "Useful Arts," and the Chimerical Mind-Machine。California Western Law Review,42,49-119。  new window
6.Durham, A. L.(1999)。"Useful Arts" in the Information Age。Brigham Young University Law Review,1999,1419-1528。  new window
7.Collins, K. E.(2012)。Prometheus Laboratories, Mental Steps, and Printed Matter。Houston Law Review,50,391-435。  new window
8.Collins, K. E.(2011)。Bilski and the Ambiguity of "An Unpatentable Abstract Idea"。Lewis & Clark Law Review,15,37-69。  new window
9.La Belle, M. M.、Schooner, H. M.(2014)。Big Banks and Business Method Patents。University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law,16(2),431-495。  new window
10.Hylton, K. N.(2016)。Patent Uncertainty: Toward A Framework with Applications。Boston University Law Review,96,1117-1148。  new window
11.Holbrook, T. R.、Janis, M. D.(2015)。Patent-Eligible Processes: An Audience Perspective。Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law,17,349-384。  new window
12.Hill, W.、Rhyne, J. S. III(2013)。Opening Pandora's Patent Box: Global Intellectual Property Tax Incentives and Their Implications for the United States。IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review,53,371-408。  new window
13.Fromer, Jeanne C.、Lemley, Mark A.(2014)。The Audience in Intellectual Property Infringement。Michigan Law Review,112,1251-1304。  new window
14.Newell, Allen(1986)。Response: The Models Are Broken, The Models Are Broken。University of Pittsburgh Law Review,47(4),1023-1035。  new window
15.Marsnik, S. J.、Thomas, R. E.(2011)。Drawing A Line in the Patent Subject-Matter Sands: Does Europe Provide A Solution to the Software and Business Method Patent Problem?。Boston College International and Comparative Law Review,34,227-327。  new window
16.Lessig, L.(1996)。Intellectual Property and Code。Saint John's Journal of Legal Commentary,11,635-639。  new window
17.Lemley, M. A.(2013)。Software Patents and the Return of Functional Claiming。Wisconsin Law Review,2013,905-964。  new window
18.Lefstin, J. A.(2015)。Inventive Application: A History。Florida Law Review,67,565-648。  new window
19.Plotkin, R.(2003)。Computer Programming and the Automation of Invention: A Case for Software Patent Reform。UCLA Journal of Law & Technology,7,1-100。  new window
20.Pierce, N. S.(2012)。A Great Invisible Crashing: The Rise and Fall of Patent Eligibility Through Mayo v. Prometheus。Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal,23,186-290。  new window
21.Oliar, Dotan(2006)。Making Sense of the Intellectual Property Clause: Promotion of Progress as a Limitation on Congress's Intellectual Property Power。Georgetown Law Journal,94,1771-1845。  new window
22.Oddi, A. S.(1993)。An Uneasier Case for Copyright Than for Patent Protection of Computer Programs。Nebraska Law Review,72,351-453。  new window
23.Yoshida, B. R.(1997)。Claiming Electronic and Software Technologies: The Effect of the Federal Circuit Decisions in Alappat, Warmerdam, and Lowry on the Claiming of Mathematical Algorithms and Data Structures。Buffalo Law Review,45,457-501。  new window
24.Swetnam-Burland, D.、Stitham, S. O.(2013)。Patent Law 101: The Threshold Test As Threshing Machine。Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal,21,135-153。  new window
25.Samuelson, P.、Schultz, J.(2011)。"Clues" for Determining Whether Business and Service Innovations are Unpatentable Abstract Ideas。Lewis & Clark Law Review,15,109-130。  new window
26.Rothenberg, D. M.(2016)。Can Siri 10.0 Buy Your Home? The Legal and Policy Based Implications of Artificial Intelligent Robots Owning Real Property。Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts,11,439-460。  new window
27.Rogers, E. J.(2012)。Patenting Medical Diagnostic Methods: The MorT Strikes Back。Journal of Technology Law & Policy,17,111-191。  new window
28.Burk, Dan L.、Lemley, Mark A.(2003)。Policy Levers in Patent Law。Virginia Law Review,89(7),1575-1696。  new window
圖書
1.蔡明誠(2007)。專利法。經濟部智慧財產局。  延伸查詢new window
2.經濟部智慧財產局(2014)。專利法逐條釋義。經濟部智慧財產局。  延伸查詢new window
3.司法院第一廳(1987)。民事法律專題研究。臺北:司法院。  延伸查詢new window
4.許忠信(20050000)。WTO與貿易有關智慧財產權協定之研究。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.趙晉枚、蔡坤財、周慧芳、謝銘洋、張凱娜、秦建譜(2012)。智慧財產權入門。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
6.Fetzer, J. H.(2001)。Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines。  new window
其他
1.經濟部智慧財產局(2015)。專利審查基準,https://www.tipo.gov.tw/public/Attachment/571616311489.rar。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top