本文從智慧財產權之特殊本質出發，討論各種國際智慧財產權訴訟之直接管轄權決定、準據法選擇與準據法適用問題，並論及該等外國裁判在承認地國獲承認與執行之要件。本文主張，直接管轄權之認定宜採多元標準，不宜採專屬管轄，而再由管轄積極衝突法則解決。在準據法部分，本文依不同訴訟類型，提出不同準據法，而主張此等準據法適用，需受法庭地法國智慧財產權法制中攸關公益部分之限制。因此，在外國判決之承認與執行上，依前述直接管轄權判斷標準'關於管轄權有無之判斷應寬鬆，但關於實體正義部分則可有承認國之特殊公益考量。本文結論指出，關於國際智慧財產權訴訟之直接管轄權決定、準據法決定與其適用，甚至判決之承認與執行，目前國際問仍眾說紛耘，但此一多元之發展，適可為我國日後修正涉外民事法律適用法或解決此類紛爭之參考。

　　On considering the nature of intellectual property, rights, this article tries to illustrate the principles for deciding the international jurisdictions, the applicable laws in the international intellectual property rights disputes, and the conditions for the recognition and enforcement of the judgments of such disputes. For the decision of international direct jurisdictions, this article proposes a pluralistic way to allow all the possible fori to have jurisdiction and rejects the criteria of exclusive jurisdiction, accompanied with the principles for the resolution of possible conflicts of jurisdictions. For finding the applicable laws, this article distinguishes the different types of disputes and identifies the possible applicable laws according to the types of disputes, in condition that such an application should be limited by the necessary and specific public interest of each country where the suit is claimed. Therefore, on the recognition and enforcement of such a judgment, it is natural to admit all the possible direct jurisdictions but to limit it by the considerations of public policy. In sum, this article concludes the pluralistic way of private international law in the international intellectual property rights disputes and contributes that to the references for the future amendments of Taiwan's private international law code.