資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(13.58.229.159)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Knowledge-Based Inference Making for Reading Comprehension: What to Teach and What Not
書刊名:
教育心理學報
作者:
卡爾斯登.艾爾博
作者(外文):
Elbro, Carsten
出版日期:
2018
卷期:
49:4
頁次:
頁701-713
主題關鍵詞:
知識性推論
;
推論教學
;
圖表組織
;
Graphic organizer
;
Inference instruction
;
Knowledge-based inference
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:
2
點閱:2
一般普遍認為文本本身並無法充分代表故事應有的內涵,他們反而可以被視為是引導讀者觸發與結合背景知識以形成連貫性心智模式的指導語。因此,讀者有必要加入自己的背景知識,並且與文本訊息連結,才有閱讀理解。然而,文本往往不會清楚顯示出到底缺少什麼訊息,所以讀者就必須進行該有的推論,以維持文章的連貫性。研究指出,理解能力弱的學生可能因為他們無法觸發相關的背景知識以進行應有的推論。在本研究當中,我們教導11歲學生透過利用圖表組織觸發相關的背景知識:有些圖表需要填入文本訊息,有些則必須填入讀者的背景知識。結果發現,這樣的教學不僅有助於學生的推論能力,也能提升他們整體的閱讀理解。本文提出兩個該研究的限制:首先,教導如何觸發背景知識可能對於閱讀說明文比閱讀敘述文重要,因為讀懂說明文較需依賴抽象的背景知識,而非具體有感的切身經驗;其次,過度依賴背景知識可能會妨礙學生學習與本身先備知識或信念矛盾的新知。本文最後呼籲複製此類的研究,並且主張激發背景知識的教學應該與「原因-結果」、「比較-對照」與「問題-解決」等常見之文章結構的教學整合。
以文找文
It is easy to see that texts do not tell the whole story. Rather, they can be seen as detailed instructions to readers about which background knowledge they should activate and combine into a coherent mental model. There fore, readers will have to add knowledge and link information from the text with relevant background knowledge. In many cases, the text does not exhibit any explicit signal that something is missing, and the reader has to make an inference to maintain the global coherence of the text. It has been shown that students with poor comprehension sometimes fail to make such knowledge-demanding inferences because they fail to activate the relevant knowledge. In a first study, 11-year-old students were taught to activate relevant background knowledge by means of graphic organisers: some boxes had to be filled with information from the text, while others were to be filled with information from the reader's background knowledge. The teaching turned out to be highly effective not only for inference making in reading, but also for reading comprehension in general. Two limitations are discussed. First, teaching to activate background knowledge is probably much more important for comprehension of expository texts than for typical narrative texts. This is so because comprehension of expository texts depends much more on background knowledge that is abstract, not first hand experience and thus not immediately available. Second, an over-reliance on background knowledge may stand in the way for learning something new that is in conflict with prior knowledge or beliefs. The paper ends with a call for replication studies. It is further suggested that the teaching of knowledge activation for inference making may be integrated into the teaching of common text structures such as cause-consequence, compare-contrast, and problem-solution.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Yuill, Nicola、Oakhill, Jane(1988)。Effects of inference awareness training on poor reading comprehension。Applied Cognitive Psychology,2(1),33-45。
2.
McGee, A.、Johnson, H.(2003)。The effect of inference training on skilled and less skilled comprehenders。Educational Psychology,23(1),49-59。
3.
Williams, J. P.、Stafford, K. B.、Lauer, K. D.、Hall, K. M.、Pollini, S.(2009)。Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction。Journal of Educational Psychology,101(1),1-20。
4.
Elbro, C.、Buch-Iversen, I.(2013)。Activation of Background Knowledge for Inference Making: Effects on Reading Comprehension。Scientific Studies of Reading,17(6),435-452。
5.
珍.奧克西爾、凱特.肯恩(20180600)。Children's Problems with Inference Making: Causes and Consequences。教育心理學報,49(4),683-699。
延伸查詢
6.
Oakhill, J. V.、Cain, K.(2012)。The precursors of rending ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study。Scientific Study of Reading,16(2),91-21。
7.
Cain, K.、Oakhill, J. V.、Barnes, M. A.、Bryant, P. E.(2001)。Comprehension Skill, Inference Making Ability and Their Relation to Knowledge。Memory and Cognition,29(6),850-859。
圖書
1.
Halliday, M. A. K.、Hasan, R.(1976)。Cohesion in English。London:Longman。
2.
Crumpler, M.、McCarty, C.(2010)。Diagnostic Reading Analysis。London:Hodder Education。
3.
Daugaard, H. T.、Elbro, C.(2012)。Teaching inference making using graphic organ isers. An effect study in normal and special education in grade 7。København:Center for Læseforskning, Københavns Universitet。
4.
Oakhill, Jane、Cain, Kate、Elbro, Carsten(2014)。Understanding and Teaching Reading Comprehension. A Handbook。London:Routledge。
單篇論文
1.
Tornes, J.(1996)。Screening teat: Ma the mntics SK: lls: M4, M5, M6, M7: Teacher manual。
其他
1.
National Reading Panel(2000)。Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction,http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/upload/ch4-II.pdf。
圖書論文
1.
Elbro, C.、Arnbak, E.(2002)。Components of reading comprehension as predictors of educational achievement。Dyslexia and literacy。London:Whurr。
2.
Pearson, P. D.、Fielding, L.(1991)。Comprehension instruction。Handbook of Reading Research。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
手勢融入故事敘說對幼兒在代名詞推論之影響
2.
語音轉碼對臺灣大學生閱讀歷程的影響:來自眼動實驗的證據
3.
兒童局部與整體連貫性推論能力發展研究
4.
Children's Problems with Inference Making: Causes and Consequences
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code