:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:試論檢察官定位與權限--從預審法官到第十位大法官
書刊名:月旦法學
作者:林超駿 引用關係
出版日期:2018
卷期:281
頁次:頁92-113
主題關鍵詞:檢察官預審法官美國聯邦司法部訴訟長偵查主體公訴人
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:2
期刊論文
1.林超駿(20140400)。初論法庭之友與美國最高法院--兼評大審法草案相關規定。月旦法學,227,198-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Johnson, David T.(2012)。Japan's Prosecution System。Crime and Justice,41,35-74。  new window
3.林超駿(20170828)。初論法律審言詞辯論--以刑事案件為中心。臺灣法學雜誌,326,116-134。  延伸查詢new window
4.林鈺雄(20120800)。檢察官的掘墓人?--綜評四組最高法院爭議裁判。月旦法學,207,52-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林超駿(20100500)。行政權之釋憲機制--美國聯邦訴訟(次)長(Solicitor General)制度與運作簡介。月旦法學,180,180-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林超駿(20050100)。概論美國最高法院移審制度之歷史演變與當下之運作模式。月旦法學,116,48-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hodgson, Jacqueline(2005)。French Criminal Justice: A Comparative Account of the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime in France。Oxford:Hart Publishing。  new window
2.Black, Ryan C.、Owens, Ryan J.(2012)。The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court: Executive Branch Influence and Judicial Decisions。  new window
3.Gilliéron, Gwladys(2014)。Public prosecutors in the United States and Europe: a comparative analysis with special focus on Switzerland, France, and Germany。  new window
4.Guarnieri, Carlo、Pederzoli, Patrizia、Thomas, C. A.(2002)。The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy。  new window
5.Turner, Jenia I.(2009)。Plea Barganing Across Borders。  new window
6.Clayton, Cornell W.(1992)。The Politics of Justice: The Attorney General and the Making of Government Legal Policy。  new window
7.林俊益(2018)。刑事訴訟法概論。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
8.CAPLAN, LINCOLN(1987)。THE TENTH JUSTICE。  new window
其他
1.尤伯祥(20170424)。司法官?行政官?檢察官的百年難題,https://www.ettoday.net/news/20170424/910506.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.王揚宇(20180330)。劍青檢改:盼新檢察總長堅守獨立及中立,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/asoc/201803300223.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳瑞仁(20161017)。陳瑞仁:最高檢應成立公訴組,https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?Type=2&SerialNo=5838。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Lewis, Chris(2006)。The prosecution service function within the English criminal justice system。Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems: The Rise of Prosecutorial Power Across Europe。Heidelberg, DE:Springer。  new window
2.Wade, Marianne(2006)。The power to decide-prosecutorial control, diversion and punishment in European criminal justice systems today。Coping with overloaded criminal justice systems: The rise of prosecutorial power across Europe。Heidelberg, DE:Springer。  new window
3.Frase, Richard S.(2007)。France。Criminal Procedure: A Worldwide Study。Durham, NC:Carolina Academic Press。  new window
4.Tricot, Juliette(2013)。France。Toward a Prosecutor for the European Union Vol. 1: A Comparative Analysis。Oxford:Hart Publishing。  new window
5.Weigend, Thomas(2013)。Germany。Toward a Prosecutor for the European Union Vol. 1: A Comparative Analysis。Oxford:Hart Publishing。  new window
6.Ruggieri, Francesca、Marcolini, Stefand(2013)。Italy。Toward a Prosecutor for the European Union Vol. 1: A Comparative Analysis。  new window
7.De Cavarlay, Burno Aubusson(2006)。The Prosecution Service Function within the French Criminal Justice System。Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems: The Rise of Prosecutorial Power Across Europe。  new window
8.Weigend, Thomas(2012)。A Judge by Another Name? Comparative Perspective on he Role of the Public Prosecutor。THE PROSECUTOR IN TRANSNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE