:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:船舶碰撞之民事爭議問題
書刊名:航運季刊
作者:饒瑞正 引用關係
作者(外文):Jao, Juei-cheng
出版日期:2017
卷期:26:4
頁次:頁73-101
主題關鍵詞:船舶碰撞涉外法律適用國際管轄責任主體Ship collisionsGoverning lawInternational jurisdictionLiable party
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:105
  • 點閱點閱:9
船舶碰撞民事侵權責任,由1910年船舶碰撞公約、1987年里斯本規則及1952年船舶碰撞民事管轄公約等三個硬、軟法國際規範,構成國際法體系。就我國法,作者研究海商法船舶碰撞章,我國法存在爭議問題如下:船舶碰撞之管轄、涉外船舶碰撞之法律適用、碰撞責任主體之確認、推定過失之禁止與否、權利行使期間之性質、重申對於加害船舶進入我國領域之司法管轄權之必要性、船舶保全執行期間限制之適當性、因船舶碰撞所生之假扣押其反擔保與其他事由所生之假扣押之反擔保之形式是否有區分之必要等。作者試圖在符合國際規範下,提出解決方案。
The tort liability arising from ship collisions is regulated by the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law with respect to Collisions between Vessels, Brussels, 23 September 1910, the Lisbon Rules and the International Convention For The Unification of Certain Rules Concerning Civil Jurisdiction in Matters of Collision, adopted in Brussels on 10 May 1952, which constitutes a framework of international regimes by its respective hard and soft law nature. As to Taiwanese law is concerned, the author identifies the issues as highly controversial under the Ships Collision Chapter in the Maritime Code as follows: civil jurisdiction, the applicable law, the liable party, the barring of legal presumption of fault, the nature of the limitation period, and the last but not least, arrest of the liable ships. The author tries to submit solutions to cope with them under the international regimes.
期刊論文
1.黃達元(20010400)。涉外船舶碰撞事件法律適用之探討。全國律師,5(4),24-32。  延伸查詢new window
2.饒瑞正(20131200)。海商法判決實證量化分析。臺灣海洋法學報,10(2),35-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.廉芳芝(19810600)。船舶碰撞責任之比較研究。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,10(2),197-236。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Shaffer, Gregory C.、Pollack, Mark A.(2010)。Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements, and Antagonists in International Governance。MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW,94(3),706-799。  new window
5.吳博文(19960600)。船舶碰撞雙方責任分配之探討。東吳法律學報,9(1),27-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.柯澤東(2000)。新海商法溯源--實體統一國際公約對臺灣海商法修正之影響。月旦法學,60,28-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.饒瑞正(2001)。海上保險契約碰撞責任條約碰撞責任條款實務適用問題之研究--兼提我國保險法責任保險部分條文再修正之建議。保險專刊,65,64-107。  延伸查詢new window
8.饒瑞正(20151200)。海商法的發展策略及其立法模式探討。臺灣海洋法學報,23,85-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Brandon, H. V.(1976)。Apportionment of liability in British courts under the Maritime Conventions Act of 1911。Tulane Law Review,51,1025。  new window
10.Tetley, W.(1981)。The Pennsylvania Rule: An Anachronism? The Pennsylvania Judgment: An Error?。Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce,13,127-146。  new window
圖書
1.柯澤東(2006)。海商法:新世紀幾何觀海商法學。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.王澤鑑(2002)。民法總則。臺北市:王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
3.姜皇池(2013)。國際公法導論。新學林出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張新平(2016)。海商法。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.王洸(1962)。海商法釋論。臺北市:海運出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.曾國雄、張志清(2008)。海商法。臺北市:思源圖書。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉宗榮(2016)。海商法。劉宗榮。  延伸查詢new window
8.駱永家(2015)。新民事訴訟法。駱永家。  延伸查詢new window
9.Berlingieri, F.(1993)。Time-Barred Actions。Lloyd's of London Press。  new window
10.Comite Maritime International(2016)。CMI YearBook 2016 Annuaire。Comite Maritime International。  new window
11.Morris, J. H. C.(2016)。The Conflict of Laws。Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.。  new window
12.McGee, A.(2017)。Limitation Periods。Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.。  new window
13.Gault, S.、Hazlewood, S.、Tettenborn, A.、Macey-Dare, T.(2016)。Marsden and Gault on Collisions at Sea。Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.。  new window
14.劉鐵錚、陳榮傳(2010)。國際私法論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.Hill, Christopher、Kulkarni, Yash(2003)。Maritime Law。NY:Informa Law from Routledge。  new window
其他
1.Comite Maritime International。International Conference Paper 1905。  new window
2.Comite Maritime International。International Conference Paper 1952。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE