:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:桌球競賽暫停策略之分析
書刊名:交大體育學刊
作者:王鈞逸 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Chun-yi
出版日期:2018
卷期:14
頁次:頁34-44
主題關鍵詞:決策行為頂尖桌球選手暫停之趨勢Decision makingTop-notch table tennis playersTime-out tendency
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:4
目的:運動競賽中暫停之申請為一決策行為,本研究旨在瞭解頂尖教練及選手申請暫停的時機,並探討暫停後之效益。方法:以2016年世界桌球錦標賽(World Table Tennis Championship, WTTC)男子團體賽八強選手作為研究對象,並以影片回顧之方式,蒐集半準決賽至決賽之暫停資料,所得數據以描述性統計建立基本資料,並以卡方適合度檢定分析暫停時機其次數之分佈情形。結果:暫停的使用率為83%,暫停局次以第3局的比率最高,局段以中局最多,比分情境最多為連續輸2-3分,暫停後的球權歸屬差異不明顯,領先時申請暫停的比率低於落後時,而暫停後1-4分的勝率約為50%。結論:現今桌球競賽十分重視暫停之申請並徹底執行,且暫停時機有提早之趨勢。而無論領先或落後時申請暫停,均具有正向效益。
Purpose: A claim for time-out in sports competition is a decision making. The aim of this study was to investigate the time-out timing from top-notch coaches and players, and also investigated the benefit after time-out. Method: Take quarter final of Men's team WTTC 2016 as subject, review the videos and collect the data of time-out from quarter final to final. The obtained data establishes basic data by descriptive statistics, and analyzes the distribution of time-out timimg times by the Test of Goodness-of-Fit. Result: Time-out rate was 83%, the highest rate of sets was in 3rd, and majority was in the middle stage. The maximum was when losing 2-3 score consecutively. The serve right did not differ a lot. Time-out rate in leading one is lower than trailing one. The winning rate is about 50% in 1-4 score after time-out was used. Conclusion: Nowadays time-out is highly valued and there is a tendency to shift the timing of time-out to an earlier time. However it both has a positive effect to time-out either in leading or trailing status.
期刊論文
1.吳述成、孟令英、張斌(1999)。談教練員的決策能力。南京體育學報,13(2),105-106。  延伸查詢new window
2.邵桂子、滿江虹(1996)。教練員合理布陣的決策分析方法研究。浙江體育科學,18(2),31-33。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉玉華、霍海峰(2002)。論體育競賽中教練決策能力的構成。山西師大體育學報,17(3),26-27。  延伸查詢new window
4.林靜萍(20020600)。桌球規則改變之探討。學校體育,12(3)=70,109-116。  延伸查詢new window
5.王明月、陳淑滿、黃俊發(20100600)。桌球比賽暫停時機運用之分析。運動研究,19(1),1-10。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.王道平(2009)。高水準乒乓球比賽暫停探析。體育文化導刊,2009(10),56-57。  延伸查詢new window
7.王飛、彭林海(2013)。淺析教練員在乒乓球比賽中對暫停時機的把握。文體用品與科技,2013(8),161-162。  延伸查詢new window
8.王明月、許吉越(20071000)。桌球比賽暫停時機重要性之探討。大專體育,92,125-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.余志國(2004)。論教練員在乒乓球比賽中暫停時機研究。湖北體育科技,23(4),506-509。  延伸查詢new window
10.周全權(2014)。乒乓球比賽中暫停對比賽結果影響分析。搏擊--體育論壇,6(12),37-38。  延伸查詢new window
11.林建豪、彭清義(20070400)。桌球比賽場上請求暫停因素之探討。大專體育,89,5-9。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.凌超超(2000)。論乒乓球比賽中的暫停。北京體育師範學院學報,12(3),38-40。  延伸查詢new window
13.路富林、姬乃春(2012)。暫停戰術在男子高水平乒乓球比賽中的作用。價值工程,2012(8),317-318。  延伸查詢new window
14.宋靜宜(2003)。規則的改革對桌球運動的影響。中華桌球,2,30-35。  延伸查詢new window
15.李鵬(2016)。關於乒乓球比賽暫停戰術的運用研究。體育科技,2016(1),26-27。  延伸查詢new window
16.曹立妍、方竹君、李昭慶(20120800)。籃球比賽中教練請求暫停時機之策略。大專體育,121,60-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.許志祥(20090600)。排球比賽暫停現況質性分析。排球教練科學,13,23-30。  延伸查詢new window
18.許銘華、陳明坤、周資眾(20170600)。競技桌球暫停策略之個案分析。臺灣體育學術研究,62,173-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.陳淑滿、謝明輝(20030200)。桌球規則修訂對選手運動表現之影響。大專體育,64,103-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.國家體育總局(2005)。中國體育教練員崗位培訓教材:乒乓球。北京市:人民體育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.International Table Tennis Federation(2018)。2018 ITTF Handbook,https://www.ittf.com/?media-alias=2018_ITTF_Handbook。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top