:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:TGS案之資訊平等理論
書刊名:財產法暨經濟法
作者:黃朝琮
作者(外文):Huang, Chao-tsung
出版日期:2018
卷期:53
頁次:頁117-145
主題關鍵詞:內線交易資訊平等理論信賴關係理論私取理論Cady, Roberts案TGS案Capital Gains案擬制詐欺內部人Insider tradingEqual access theoryFiduciary theoryMisappropriation theoryCady, RobertsTGSCapital GainsConstructive fraudInsider
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:3
期刊論文
1.姚志明(20101200)。內線交易責任主體之研究。月旦民商法雜誌,30,81-103。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ruder, D. S.(1963)。Civil Liability under Rule 10b-5:Judicial Revision of Legislative Intent?。Northwestern University Law Review,57,627-690。  new window
3.郭大維(20080300)。我國公開收購制度之探討--兼論英美相關立法例。臺北大學法學論叢,65,89-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Langevoort, Donald C.(1999)。Rereading Cady, Roberts: The ideology and Practice of Insider Trading Regulation。Columbia Law Review,99,1319-1343。  new window
5.Weiss, Elliott J.(1998)。United States v. O'Hagan: Pragmatism Returns to the Law of Insider Trading。The Journal of Corporation Law,23,395-437。  new window
6.Barry, John F. III(1981)。The Economics of Outside Information and Rule 10b-5。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,129(6),1307-1391。  new window
7.朱德芳(20180600)。公開收購下之資訊使用與內線交易--以開發金控併金鼎證券案為例。政大法學評論,153,193-251。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.江朝聖(20161028)。按摩師是內線交易的內部人?/臺高院104金上訴53刑事判決。臺灣法學雜誌,306,145-148。  延伸查詢new window
9.張心悌(20160700)。消息受領人偶然聽聞之內線交易責任--兼評臺灣高等法院104年度金上字第53號刑事判決。月旦裁判時報,49,30-37。  延伸查詢new window
10.張心悌(20180200)。內線交易與忠實義務之違反--兼評臺灣高等法院104年度金上字第6號民事判決。月旦裁判時報,68,95-102。  延伸查詢new window
11.惲純良(20160700)。誰的標準?誰的具體?--評最高法院一○四年度臺上字第三八七七號判決:內線訊息具體性的認定標準。月旦法學,254,219-242。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃朝琮(2018)。由Fiduciary Duty之翻譯試詮其理解。中律會訊,21(1),47-57。  延伸查詢new window
13.Austin, Janet(2017)。What Exactly Is Market Integrity: An Analysis of One of the Core Objectives of Securities Regulation。William and Mary Business Law Review,8。  new window
14.Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2018)。Equal Access to Information: The Fraud at the Heart of Texas Gulf Sulphur。SMU Law Review,71。  new window
15.Cary, William(1965)。Insider Trading in Stocks。The Business Lawyer,21,1009-1027。  new window
16.Cox, James D.(2018)。Seeking an Objective for Regulating insider Trading through Texas Gulf Sulphur。SMU Law Review,71。  new window
17.Dolgopolov, Stainslav(2008)。Insider trading, Chinese Walls, and brokerage commissions: The origins of modern regulation of information flows in securities markets。The Journal of Law, Economics & Policy,4(2),311-368。  new window
18.Fairfax, Lisa M.(2018)。From Equality to Duty: On Altering the Reach, Impact, and Meaning of the Texas Gulf Legacy。SMU Law Review,71。  new window
19.Fleischer, Arthur、Mundheim, Robert、Murphy, John C.(1973)。An Initial Inquiry into the Responsibility to Disclose Market Information。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,121,798-858。  new window
20.Fleischer, Arthur, Jr.(1965)。Securities Trading and Corporate Information Practices: The Implications of the Texas Gulf Sulphur Proceeding。Virginia Law Review,51,1271-1305。  new window
21.Karmel, Roberta S.(1991)。The Second Circuit's Role in Expanding the SEC's Jurisdiction Abroad。St. John's Law Review,65。  new window
22.Kaufman, Michael J.(2018)。From Texas Gulf Sulphur to Laudato Si': Mining Equitable Principles from insider Trading Law。SMU Law Review,71。  new window
23.Langevoort, Donald C.(1982)。Insider Trading and the Fiduciary Principle: A Post-Chiarella Restatement。California Law Review,70。  new window
24.Langevoort, Donald C.(2018)。From Texas Gulf Sulphur to Chiarella: A Tale of Two Duties。SMU Law Review,71。  new window
25.Richmond, Douglas R(2015)。Fraud and Misrepresentation Claims Against Lawyers。Nev. L.J.,16。  new window
26.Ruder, David S.(1968)。Texas Gulf Sulphur--The Second Round: Privity and State of Mind in Rule 10b-5 Purchase and Sale Cases。Northwestern University Law Review,63。  new window
27.Steinberg, Marc I.(2018)。Insider Trading and Timely Disclosure under the U.s. Securities Laws - Fifty Years after the Seminal Case of Texas Gulf。SMU Law Review,71。  new window
28.Warren, Manning G. III(2018)。A Birthday Toast to Texas Gulf Sulphur。SMU Law Review,71。  new window
29.Weinberger, Alan M.(2017)。Forever Young: Texas Gulf Sulphur Rules at Fifty。Securities Regulation Law Journal,45。  new window
30.Loss, Louis(1977)。Introduction: The Federal Securities Code - Its Purpose, Plan, and Progress。VAND. L. REV.,30,315-326。  new window
圖書
1.賴英照(2017)。誰怕內線交易。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉連煜(2012)。內線交易構成要件。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴英照(2014)。最新證券交易法解析:股市遊戲規則。賴英照。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Pritchard, Adam C.,Thompson, Robert B.(20180213)。Securities Law in the Sixties: The Supreme Court, the Second Circuit, and the Triumph of Purpose Over Text,https://ssrn.com/abstract--3119969。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃朝琮(2017)。合意公開收購股份前之資訊取得與揭露。公司法論文集I:受託義務之理論與應用。臺北:新學林。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃朝琮(2017)。詐欺市場理論中之效率市場與價格沖擊。公司法論文集II:特殊交易型態與資訊揭露。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃朝琮(2017)。美國案例法上內線交易責任主體範圍之變遷與啟示。公司法論文集II:特殊交易型態與資訊揭露。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃朝琮(2017)。內線消息傅遞責任之探討。公司法論文集II:特殊交易型態與資訊揭露。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2013)。An overview of insider trading law and policy: an introduction to the research handbook on insider trading。Research Handbook on Insider Trading。Edward Elgar。  new window
6.Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2013)。Regulating Insider Trading in the Post-Fiduciary Duty Era: Equal Access or Property Rights?。Research Handbook on Insider Trading。  new window
7.Pritchard, Adam C.(2013)。Launching the Insider Trading Revolution: SEC v. Capital Gains Research Bureau。Research Handbook on Insider Trading。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE