期刊論文1. | Raustiala, Kal、Sprigman, Christopher(2006)。The piracy paradox: Innovation and intellectual property in fashion design。Virginia Law Review,92,1687-1778。 |
2. | Mireles, Michael S. Jr.(2013)。Aesthetic Functionality。Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal,21,155-209。 |
3. | Afori, Orit Fischman(2010)。The Role of the Non-Functionality Requirement in Design Law。Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal,20,847-850。 |
4. | Keyes, Barton R.(2008)。Alive and Well: The (Still) Ongoing Debate Surrounding Conceptual Separability in American Copyright Law。Ohio State Law Journal,69,109-115。 |
5. | 蔡岳勳、胡心蘭(20070400)。論美國數位千禧年著作權法中反規避濫用原則之發展。科技法學評論,4(1),103-152。 延伸查詢 |
6. | 胡心蘭(20110600)。是壟斷智慧?還是創造財產?--從勞動財產權理論論智慧財產權擴張之趨勢。財產法暨經濟法,26,85-127。 延伸查詢 |
7. | 葉雪美(20130600)。論美國設計專利侵害之損害賠償--以Apple獲得10.5億美元的損害賠償為例。智慧財產權,174,5-51。 延伸查詢 |
8. | Carani, Christopher V.(2014)。Design Patent Functionality: A Sensible Solution。Landslide,7(2)。 |
9. | 葉雪美(20070500)。美國設計專利類型的揭露要件與權利保護範圍。智慧財產權月刊,101,30-63。 延伸查詢 |
10. | Hudson, Thomas B.(1948)。A Brief History of the Development of Design Patent Protection in the United States。Journal of the Patent Office Society,30(5),380-399。 |
11. | Torrance, Andrew W.(2012)。Beauty Fades: An Experimental Study of Federal Court Design Patent Aesthetics。Journal of Intellectual Property Law,19。 |
12. | Janis, Mark David、Du Mont, Jason J.(2012)。Functionality in Design Protection Systems。Journal of Intellectual Property Law,19。 |
13. | Buccafusco, Christopher、Lemley, Mark A.(2017)。Functionality Screens。Virginia Law Review,103,1293-1377。 |
14. | Ginsburg, Jane C.(2017)。The Sum is More Public Domain than its Parts?: US Copyright Protection for Works of Applied Art Under Star Athletica's Imagination Test。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166,83-104。 |
15. | McKenna, Mark P.、Sprigman, Christopher Jon(2017)。What's In, and What's Out: How IP's Boundary Rules Shape Innovation。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology,30,491-544。 |
16. | Buccafusco, Christopher、Fromer, Jeanne C.(2017)。Forgetting Functionality。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166。 |
17. | Menell, Peter S.、Yablon, Daniel(2017)。Star Athletica's Fissure in the Intellectual Property Functionality Landscape。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166。 |
18. | Hick, Darren Hudson(2009)。Conceptual Problems of Conceptual Separability and the Non-Usefulness of the Useful Articles Distinction。Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA,57。 |
19. | 胡心蘭(20180800)。從啦啦隊制服案探討美國實用性物品設計之著作權法保護。東海大學法學研究,55,95-172。 延伸查詢 |
20. | 胡心蘭(20190500)。Under My IP Umbrella?論美國時尚設計智財權保護。東海大學法學研究,57,127-212。 延伸查詢 |
21. | 徐銘夆(20160100)。從美國Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien, Inc.案解析設計專利功能性之判斷原則--兼述智慧財產法院104行專訴32號判決。專利師,24,58-88。 延伸查詢 |
22. | 徐銘夆(20170600)。「區分」並「排除」功能性特徵?從蘋果控告三星侵權事件探討功能性特徵對設計專利權範圍解釋之影響。智慧財產權月刊,222,23-36。 延伸查詢 |
23. | 許炳華(20150100)。商標法之美感功能性理論--以美國Christian Louboutin S. A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Holding案為探討核心。中正財經法學,10,53-105。 延伸查詢 |
24. | 葉哲維(20160900)。由歐盟及美國之案例探討設計與商標之累積保護與競合。智慧財產權月刊,213,62-93。 延伸查詢 |
25. | 葉雪美(20120100)。解析美國設計專利侵害認定檢測的發展與應用--從美國Gorham案例談到Egyptian案例。智慧財產權月刊,157,5-66。 延伸查詢 |
26. | 葉雪美(20140700)。我國設計專利侵害判斷流程與分析方法之再檢討。專利師,18,30-89。 延伸查詢 |
27. | Balganesh, Shyamkrishna(2017)。Foreword: Clarifying the "Clear Meaning" of Separability。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166。 |
28. | Bone, Robert G.(2015)。Trademark Functionality Reexamined。Journal of Legal Analysis,7。 |
29. | Brean, Daniel H.(2008)。Enough Is Enough: Time to Eliminate Design Patents and Rely on More Appropriate Copyright and Trademark Protection for Product Designs。Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal,16。 |
30. | Du Mont, Jason John、Janis, Mark D.(2013)。The Origins of American Design Patent Protection。Indiana Law Journal,88(3),837-880。 |
31. | Hughes, Justin(2015)。Cognitive and Aesthetic Functionality in Trademark Law。Cardozo Law Review,36。 |
32. | Lemley, Mark A.、McKenna, Mark P.(2016)。Scope。William & Mary Law Review,57。 |
33. | McKenna, Mark P.、Strandburg, Katherine J.(2013)。Progress and Competition in Design。Stanford Technology Law Review,17。 |
34. | McKenna, Mark P.(2017)。Knowing Separability When We See It。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166。 |
35. | McKenna, Mark P.(2012)。(Dys) Functionality。Houston Law Review,48。 |
36. | Mott, Kelsey Martin(1962)。The Standard of Ornamentality in the United States Design Patent Law。American Bar Association Journal,48,548-552。 |
37. | Ochoa, Tyler T.(2017)。What Is a "Useful Article" in Copyright Law after Star Athletica?。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166。 |
38. | Saidman, Perry J.(2009)。Functionality and Design Patent Validity and Infringement。Journal of The Patent and Trademark Office Society,91。 |
39. | Saidman, Perry J.(2017)。The Demise of the Functionality Doctrine in Design Patent Law。Notre Dame Law Review,92。 |
40. | Olson, Shana L.(2017)。Competing Design Doctrines: A Comparative Review of Design Patent & Trade Dress Functionality。AIPLA Quarterly Journal,45。 |