:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:功能性原則之功能--論美國智慧財產權法下功能性原則之發展與交錯
書刊名:成大法學
作者:胡心蘭
作者(外文):Hu, Hsin-lan
出版日期:2019
卷期:37
頁次:頁173-266
主題關鍵詞:功能性原則純功能性特徵固有實用性功能美感功能性工業設計產品實用性物品FunctionalityPurely functional featureIntrinsic utilitarian functionAesthetic functionIndustrial design productUseful article
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:468
期刊論文
1.Raustiala, Kal、Sprigman, Christopher(2006)。The piracy paradox: Innovation and intellectual property in fashion design。Virginia Law Review,92,1687-1778。  new window
2.Mireles, Michael S. Jr.(2013)。Aesthetic Functionality。Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal,21,155-209。  new window
3.Afori, Orit Fischman(2010)。The Role of the Non-Functionality Requirement in Design Law。Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal,20,847-850。  new window
4.Keyes, Barton R.(2008)。Alive and Well: The (Still) Ongoing Debate Surrounding Conceptual Separability in American Copyright Law。Ohio State Law Journal,69,109-115。  new window
5.蔡岳勳、胡心蘭(20070400)。論美國數位千禧年著作權法中反規避濫用原則之發展。科技法學評論,4(1),103-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.胡心蘭(20110600)。是壟斷智慧?還是創造財產?--從勞動財產權理論論智慧財產權擴張之趨勢。財產法暨經濟法,26,85-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.葉雪美(20130600)。論美國設計專利侵害之損害賠償--以Apple獲得10.5億美元的損害賠償為例。智慧財產權,174,5-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Carani, Christopher V.(2014)。Design Patent Functionality: A Sensible Solution。Landslide,7(2)。  new window
9.葉雪美(20070500)。美國設計專利類型的揭露要件與權利保護範圍。智慧財產權月刊,101,30-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Hudson, Thomas B.(1948)。A Brief History of the Development of Design Patent Protection in the United States。Journal of the Patent Office Society,30(5),380-399。  new window
11.Torrance, Andrew W.(2012)。Beauty Fades: An Experimental Study of Federal Court Design Patent Aesthetics。Journal of Intellectual Property Law,19。  new window
12.Janis, Mark David、Du Mont, Jason J.(2012)。Functionality in Design Protection Systems。Journal of Intellectual Property Law,19。  new window
13.Buccafusco, Christopher、Lemley, Mark A.(2017)。Functionality Screens。Virginia Law Review,103,1293-1377。  new window
14.Ginsburg, Jane C.(2017)。The Sum is More Public Domain than its Parts?: US Copyright Protection for Works of Applied Art Under Star Athletica's Imagination Test。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166,83-104。  new window
15.McKenna, Mark P.、Sprigman, Christopher Jon(2017)。What's In, and What's Out: How IP's Boundary Rules Shape Innovation。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology,30,491-544。  new window
16.Buccafusco, Christopher、Fromer, Jeanne C.(2017)。Forgetting Functionality。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166。  new window
17.Menell, Peter S.、Yablon, Daniel(2017)。Star Athletica's Fissure in the Intellectual Property Functionality Landscape。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166。  new window
18.Hick, Darren Hudson(2009)。Conceptual Problems of Conceptual Separability and the Non-Usefulness of the Useful Articles Distinction。Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA,57。  new window
19.胡心蘭(20180800)。從啦啦隊制服案探討美國實用性物品設計之著作權法保護。東海大學法學研究,55,95-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.胡心蘭(20190500)。Under My IP Umbrella?論美國時尚設計智財權保護。東海大學法學研究,57,127-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.徐銘夆(20160100)。從美國Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien, Inc.案解析設計專利功能性之判斷原則--兼述智慧財產法院104行專訴32號判決。專利師,24,58-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.徐銘夆(20170600)。「區分」並「排除」功能性特徵?從蘋果控告三星侵權事件探討功能性特徵對設計專利權範圍解釋之影響。智慧財產權月刊,222,23-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.許炳華(20150100)。商標法之美感功能性理論--以美國Christian Louboutin S. A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Holding案為探討核心。中正財經法學,10,53-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.葉哲維(20160900)。由歐盟及美國之案例探討設計與商標之累積保護與競合。智慧財產權月刊,213,62-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.葉雪美(20120100)。解析美國設計專利侵害認定檢測的發展與應用--從美國Gorham案例談到Egyptian案例。智慧財產權月刊,157,5-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.葉雪美(20140700)。我國設計專利侵害判斷流程與分析方法之再檢討。專利師,18,30-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Balganesh, Shyamkrishna(2017)。Foreword: Clarifying the "Clear Meaning" of Separability。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166。  new window
28.Bone, Robert G.(2015)。Trademark Functionality Reexamined。Journal of Legal Analysis,7。  new window
29.Brean, Daniel H.(2008)。Enough Is Enough: Time to Eliminate Design Patents and Rely on More Appropriate Copyright and Trademark Protection for Product Designs。Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal,16。  new window
30.Du Mont, Jason John、Janis, Mark D.(2013)。The Origins of American Design Patent Protection。Indiana Law Journal,88(3),837-880。  new window
31.Hughes, Justin(2015)。Cognitive and Aesthetic Functionality in Trademark Law。Cardozo Law Review,36。  new window
32.Lemley, Mark A.、McKenna, Mark P.(2016)。Scope。William & Mary Law Review,57。  new window
33.McKenna, Mark P.、Strandburg, Katherine J.(2013)。Progress and Competition in Design。Stanford Technology Law Review,17。  new window
34.McKenna, Mark P.(2017)。Knowing Separability When We See It。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166。  new window
35.McKenna, Mark P.(2012)。(Dys) Functionality。Houston Law Review,48。  new window
36.Mott, Kelsey Martin(1962)。The Standard of Ornamentality in the United States Design Patent Law。American Bar Association Journal,48,548-552。  new window
37.Ochoa, Tyler T.(2017)。What Is a "Useful Article" in Copyright Law after Star Athletica?。University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online,166。  new window
38.Saidman, Perry J.(2009)。Functionality and Design Patent Validity and Infringement。Journal of The Patent and Trademark Office Society,91。  new window
39.Saidman, Perry J.(2017)。The Demise of the Functionality Doctrine in Design Patent Law。Notre Dame Law Review,92。  new window
40.Olson, Shana L.(2017)。Competing Design Doctrines: A Comparative Review of Design Patent & Trade Dress Functionality。AIPLA Quarterly Journal,45。  new window
研究報告
1.Crouch, Dennis D.(2010)。A Trademark Justification for Design Patent Rights。University of Missouri School of Law。  new window
學位論文
1.王冠霖(2017)。應用美術著作之保護--兼論著作權與設計專利之界線(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭品君(2017)。產品外觀設計之智慧財產權保護與競合(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.李昱晨(2017)。產品外觀之法律保護(碩士論文)。東吳大學,臺北巿。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Goldstein, Paul(1989)。Copyright: Principles, Law and Practice。Little, Brown and Company。  new window
2.Mccarthy, J. Thomas(2018)。Mccarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE