In Taiwan Constitutional Court Judgment 111-Hsien-Pan-13, the legal issue under judicial view was-whether Articles 79 and 80 of the National Health Insurance Act and Article 6, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Personal Data Protection Act were in breach of the Constitutional Law. The Constitutional Court decided in said judgment that-(1) the National Health Insurance Administration's establishment and management of the health database was conducted without an express authorization by laws and therefore was in breach of the principle of legal reservation as stipulated in Article 23 of the Constitution; and (2) the Personal Data Protection Act was enacted to serve as a baseline protection for information privacy and was not only for the health database; Article 6, Paragraph 1, Item 4 is therefore not in breach of the principle of legal certainty and principle of proportionality. While said judgment has ruled that the relevant regulations are in breach of the Constitutional Law for lacking appropriate regime in providing individuals to stop others from using their own personal data, there is little guidance provided in said judgment as to what is the appropriate regulatory mechanism for purpose of protecting health data if such data will be processed in a health database organization. This article proposes that while the collection and usage of health data has become an important part of developing smart health industry and it is a global trend to build up heath database, it is more practical to look for approaches to improve the infrastructure of personal data protection; with an improved and better structured health database for matters of information privacy protection, the database might be able to offer an enhanced level for protection personal data. This article proposes that, in designing an appropriate protection regime in the future, the Human Biobank Management Act can be referred to as a model with appropriate amendments made with reference to the comparative law study.