:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中日韓產業系統的比較
書刊名:交大管理學報
作者:林國雄
出版日期:1986
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁71-95
主題關鍵詞:系統產業
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:18
本文利用日本1980年完全消除部門內交易後的產業關聯乘數γ△ij,遵循奧地利經濟學者的生產結構觀念,構建日本的產業系統並從事中日韓三國的比較,根據產業系統的比較本文計列出13項重要的發現,俾供各界參考。
In This paper, the author uses Japanese 1980 interindustrial multipliers γ△ij compiled by the extremely net output method, following the production structure concept of Austrian economists, to form Japanese industrial systems, and compare them with those of Taiwan and South Korea. Based on the comparison of industrial systems, thirteen important findings were listed. The above findings can be served as readers’ references.
期刊論文
1.林國雄(19831200)。臺灣產業系統的解析。交大管理學報,3(2),19-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林國雄(19851200)。中韓產業系統及結構的比較。交大管理學報,5(1),19-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林國雄(19770300)。論臺灣鋼鐵產業系統之發展。中國論壇,3(12),12-14。  延伸查詢new window
4.Ho, Samuel P. S.(1981)。South Korea and Taiwan: Development Prospects and Problems in the 1980s。Asian Survey,21(12),1175-1196。  new window
5.Hsing, Mo-huan(19750300)。The Development Experiences of Taiwan and South Korea: A Comparison。經濟論文,3(1),1-20。  new window
6.Rea, T. T.、Chakraborty, D.、Small, J. A.(1984)。An Alternative Treatment of Secondary Products in Input-Output Analysis。The Review of Economics & Statistics,66(1),88-97。  new window
7.Lin, Kuo-hsiung(19830900)。Distorted Interindustrial Multipliers。經濟論文,11(2),131-149。  new window
8.林國雄(19830600)。產業關聯模型的改進。交大管理學報,3(1),69-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.張國安(1982)。對發展策略性工業之看法。中國經濟學會71年度年會。臺北。4-5。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dorfman, Robert、Samuelson, Paul A.、Solow, Robert M.(1958)。Linear Programming and Economic Analysis。New York:McGraw Hill。  new window
2.楊正光(1985)。中日產業系統之比較。交通大學管理科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.Council for Economic Planning and Development, Executive Yuan(1980)。Taiwan Statistical Data Book。  new window
4.Huang, Show-Chuen(1977)。The Treatment of Secondary Production in Input-Output Analysis。Washington, D. C.:Bureau of Economic Analysis, the United States Department of Commerce。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top